11 Literally, the absence of knowledge. [Editor’s note.]
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY
57
concentrated on a single question; succumbing to a kind of
fascination regarding its scientific value; they delved into de-
tailed inquiries. Their achievements may be present in this
work, since they understood the general mining of their work.
Others gave up in the face of scientific problems, personal
difficulties, or the fear of being discovered by the authorities,
who are highly vigilant in such matters.
Perusing this book will therefore confront the reader with
similar problems, albeit on a much smaller scale. A certain
impression of injustice may be conveyed due to the need to
leave behind a significant portion of our prior conceptualiza-
tions, the feeling that our natural world view is inapplicable,
and the expendability of some emotional entanglements. I
therefore ask my readers to accept these disturbing feelings in
the spirit of the love of knowledge and its redeeming values.
The above explanations were crucial in order to render the
language of this work more easily comprehensible to the read-
ers. The author has attempted to approach the matters described
herein in such a way as to avoid both losing touch with the
world of objective concepts and becoming incomprehensible to
anyone outside a narrow circle of specialists. We must thus beg
the reader to pardon any slips along the tightrope between the
two methods of thought. However, the author would not be an
experienced psychologist if he could not predict that some
readers will reject the scientific data adduced within this work,
feeling that they constitute an attack upon the natural wisdom
of their life-experience.
The Human Individual
When Auguste Comte12 attempted to found the new science
of sociology during the early nineteenth century, i.e. well be-
12 Auguste Comte (1798 - 1857) was a French positivist thinker who invented
the term “sociology” to name the new science made by Saint-Simon. Comte
saw a “universal law” at work in all sciences which he called the “law of
three phases”. It is for this law that he is best known in the English-speaking
world; namely, that society has gone through three phases: Theological,
Metaphysical, and Scientific. He also gave the name “Positive” to the last of
these. The other universal law he called the “encyclopedic law”. By combin-
ing these laws, Comte developed a systematic and hierarchical classification
of all sciences, including inorganic physics (astronomy, earth science and
58
SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS
fore modern psychology was born, he was immediately con-
fronted with the problem of man, a mystery he could not solve.
If he rejected the Catholic Church’s oversimplifications of
human nature, then nothing remained except traditional
schemes for comprehending the personality, derived from well
known social conditions. He thus had to avoid this problem,
among others, if he wanted to create his new scientific branch
under such conditions.
Therefore, he accepted that the basic cell of society is the
family, something much easier to characterize and treat like an
elementary model of societal relations. This could also be ef-
fected by means of a language of comprehensible concepts,
without confronting problems which could truly not have been
overcome at the time. Slightly later, J. S. Mill13 pointed out the
resulting deficiencies of psychological cognition and the role of
the individuals.
chemistry) and organic physics (biology and for the first time,
the last and greatest of all sciences, one that would include all other sciences,
and which would integrate and relate their findings into a cohesive whole.
(Wikipedia)
13 John Stuart Mill (1806 – 1873), an English philosopher and political
economist, was an influential liberal thinker of the 19th century. He was an
advocate of utilitarianism, the ethical theory first proposed by his godfather
Jeremy Bentham. During his time as an MP, Mill advocated easing the bur-
dens on Ireland, and became the first person in parliament to call for women
to be given the right to vote. In “Considerations on Representative Govern-
ment”, Mill called for various reforms of Parliament and voting, especially
proportional representation, the Single Transferable Vote, and the extension
of suffrage. He was godfather to Bertrand Russell. Mill argued that it is
Government’s role only to remove the barriers, such as laws, to behaviors
that do not harm others. Crucially, he felt that offense did not constitute
harm, and therefore supported almost total freedom of speech; only in cases
where free speech would lead to direct harm did Mill wish to limit it. For
example, whipping up an angry mob to go and attack people would not be