basic capital, namely the talent pool of its members. This si-
multaneously leads to increasing dissatisfaction and tensions
among individuals and social groups; any attempt to approach
human talent and its productivity problematics as a purely pri-
vate matter must therefore be considered dangerously naive.
Development or involution in all areas of cultural, economic
and political life depend on the extent to which this talent pool
is properly utilized.
Technically speaking, it would be easier to construct appro-
priate methods that enable us to evaluate the correlations be-
tween individual talents and social adjustment in a given coun-
try, than to deal with the prior proposition of the development
of psychological concepts. Conducting the proper tests would
furnish us a valuable index that we might call “the social order
indicator.” The closer the figure to +1.0, the more likely the
country in question would be to fulfill that basic precondition
for social order and take the proper path in the direction of
dynamic development. A low correlation would be an indica-
tion that social reform is needed. A near-zero or even negative
correlation should be interpreted as a danger-sign that revolu-
tion is imminent. Revolutions in one country often cause mani-
fold problems for other countries, so it is in the best interests of
all countries to monitor such conditions.
The examples adduced above do not exhaust the question of
causative factors influencing the creation of a social structure
which would adequately correspond to the laws of nature. Our
species-instinct level has already encoded the intuition that the
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY
77
existence of society’s internal structure,
our basic intelligence, inspiring our healthy common sense.
This explains why the most numerous part of populations,
whose talents are near average, generally accepts its modest
social position in any country as long as the position fulfills the
indispensable requirements of proper social adjustment and
guarantees an equitable way of life no matter at what level of
society the individual finds their proper fit.
This average majority accepts and respects the social role of
people whose talents and education are superior, as long as
they occupy appropriate positions within the social structure.
The same people, however, will react with criticism, disrespect,
and even contempt, whenever someone as average as them-
selves compensates for his deficiencies by flaunting an up-
wardly-adjusted position. The judgments pronounced by this
sphere of average but sensible people can often be highly accu-
rate, which can and should be all the more remarkable if we
take into account that said people could not possibly have had
sufficient knowledge of many of the actual problems, be they
scientific, technical, or economic.21
An experienced politician can rarely assume that the diffi-
culties in the areas of economics, defense, or international pol-
icy will be fully understand by his constituency. However, he
can and should assume that his own comprehension of human
matters, and anything having to do with interpersonal relations
within said structure, will find an echo in this same majority of
his society’s members. These facts
democracy, especially if a particular country has historically
had such a tradition, the social structure is well developed, and
the level of education is adequate. Nevertheless, they do not
represent psychological data sufficient to raise democracy to
the level of a moral criterion in politics. A democracy com-
posed of individuals of inadequate psychological knowledge
can only devolve.
21 Very often false opinion polls are used to attempt to manipulate a society’s
perception of its officials. This never works for very long as, eventually,
incompetence is revealed to all. [Editor’s note.]
78
SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS
The same politician should be conscious of the fact that so-
ciety contains people who already carry the psychological re-
sults of social maladjustment. Some of these individuals at-
tempt to protect positions for which their skills are not com-
mensurate, while others fight to be allowed to use their talents.
Governing a country becomes increasingly difficult when such
battles begin to eclipse other important needs. That is why the