Читаем Political Ponerology: A Science on the Nature of Evil Adjusted for Political Purposes полностью

basic capital, namely the talent pool of its members. This si-

multaneously leads to increasing dissatisfaction and tensions

among individuals and social groups; any attempt to approach

human talent and its productivity problematics as a purely pri-

vate matter must therefore be considered dangerously naive.

Development or involution in all areas of cultural, economic

and political life depend on the extent to which this talent pool

is properly utilized. In the final analysis, it also determines

whether there will be evolution or revolution.

Technically speaking, it would be easier to construct appro-

priate methods that enable us to evaluate the correlations be-

tween individual talents and social adjustment in a given coun-

try, than to deal with the prior proposition of the development

of psychological concepts. Conducting the proper tests would

furnish us a valuable index that we might call “the social order

indicator.” The closer the figure to +1.0, the more likely the

country in question would be to fulfill that basic precondition

for social order and take the proper path in the direction of

dynamic development. A low correlation would be an indica-

tion that social reform is needed. A near-zero or even negative

correlation should be interpreted as a danger-sign that revolu-

tion is imminent. Revolutions in one country often cause mani-

fold problems for other countries, so it is in the best interests of

all countries to monitor such conditions.

The examples adduced above do not exhaust the question of

causative factors influencing the creation of a social structure

which would adequately correspond to the laws of nature. Our

species-instinct level has already encoded the intuition that the


POLITICAL PONEROLOGY

77

existence of society’s internal structure, based on psychologi-

cal variations, is necessary; it continues to develop alongside

our basic intelligence, inspiring our healthy common sense.

This explains why the most numerous part of populations,

whose talents are near average, generally accepts its modest

social position in any country as long as the position fulfills the

indispensable requirements of proper social adjustment and

guarantees an equitable way of life no matter at what level of

society the individual finds their proper fit.

This average majority accepts and respects the social role of

people whose talents and education are superior, as long as

they occupy appropriate positions within the social structure.

The same people, however, will react with criticism, disrespect,

and even contempt, whenever someone as average as them-

selves compensates for his deficiencies by flaunting an up-

wardly-adjusted position. The judgments pronounced by this

sphere of average but sensible people can often be highly accu-

rate, which can and should be all the more remarkable if we

take into account that said people could not possibly have had

sufficient knowledge of many of the actual problems, be they

scientific, technical, or economic.21

An experienced politician can rarely assume that the diffi-

culties in the areas of economics, defense, or international pol-

icy will be fully understand by his constituency. However, he

can and should assume that his own comprehension of human

matters, and anything having to do with interpersonal relations

within said structure, will find an echo in this same majority of

his society’s members. These facts partially justify the idea of

democracy, especially if a particular country has historically

had such a tradition, the social structure is well developed, and

the level of education is adequate. Nevertheless, they do not

represent psychological data sufficient to raise democracy to

the level of a moral criterion in politics. A democracy com-

posed of individuals of inadequate psychological knowledge

can only devolve.


21 Very often false opinion polls are used to attempt to manipulate a society’s

perception of its officials. This never works for very long as, eventually,

incompetence is revealed to all. [Editor’s note.]

78

SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS

The same politician should be conscious of the fact that so-

ciety contains people who already carry the psychological re-

sults of social maladjustment. Some of these individuals at-

tempt to protect positions for which their skills are not com-

mensurate, while others fight to be allowed to use their talents.

Governing a country becomes increasingly difficult when such

battles begin to eclipse other important needs. That is why the

creation of a fair social structure continues to be a basic pre-

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Качели
Качели

Известный политолог Сергей Кургинян в своей новой книге рассматривает феномен так называемой «подковерной политики». Одновременно он разрабатывает аппарат, с помощью которого можно анализировать нетранспарентные («подковерные») политические процессы, и применяет этот аппарат к анализу текущих событий. Автор анализирует самые актуальные события новейшей российской политики. Отставки и назначения, аресты и высказывания, коммерческие проекты и политические эксцессы. При этом актуальность (кто-то скажет «сенсационность») анализируемых событий не заслоняет для него подлинный смысл происходящего. Сергей Кургинян не становится на чью-то сторону, не пытается кого-то демонизировать. Он выступает не как следователь или журналист, а как исследователь элиты. Аппарат теории элит, социология закрытых групп, миропроектная конкуренция, политическая культурология позволяют автору разобраться в происходящем, не опускаясь до «теории заговора» или «войны компроматов».

Сергей Ервандович Кургинян

Политика / Образование и наука