reality. The psychological world view, which constitutes the
basic factor in cultural development and activates social life,
thus becomes involuted.
It thus behooves us to ask: Is good government possible?
development are those countries whose populations number
between ten and twenty million, and where personal bonds
among citizens, and between citizens and their authorities, still
safeguard correct psychological differentiation and natural
relationships. Overly large countries should be divided into
smaller organisms enjoying considerable autonomy, especially
as regards cultural and economic matters; they could afford
their citizens a feeling of homeland within which their person-
alities could develop and mature.
If someone asked me what should be done to heal the
United States of America, a country which manifests symptoms
of macropathy,
nation into thirteen states--just like the original ones, except
correspondingly larger and with more natural boundaries. Such
states should then be given considerable autonomy. That would
afford citizens a feeling of homeland, albeit a smaller one, and
liberate the motivations of local patriotism and rivalry among
such states. This would, in turn, facilitate solutions to other
problems with a different origin.
~~~
Society is not an organism subordinating every cell to the
good of the whole; neither is it a colony of insects, where the
collective instinct acts like a dictator. However, it should also
avoid being a compendium of egocentric individuals linked
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY
81
purely by economic interests and legal and formal organiza-
tions.
Any society is a socio-psychological structure woven of in-
dividuals whose psychological organization is the highest, and
thus the most variegated. A significant scope of man’s individ-
ual freedom derives from this state of affairs and subsists in an
extremely complicated relationship to his manifold psychologi-
cal dependencies and duties, with regard to this collective
whole.
Isolating an individual’s personal interest as if it were at war
with collective interests is pure speculation which radically
oversimplifies real conditions instead of tracking their complex
nature. Asking questions based on such schemes is logically
defective, since it contains erroneous suggestions.
In reality, many ostensibly contradictory interests, such as
individual vs. collective or those of various social groups and
substructures, could be reconciled if we could be guided by a
sufficiently penetrating understanding of the good of man and
society, and if we could overcome the operations of emotions
as well as some more or less primitive doctrines. Such recon-
ciliation, however, requires transferring the human and social
problems in question to a higher level of understanding and
acceptance of the natural laws of life. At this level, even the
most difficult problems turn out to have a solution, since they
invariably derive from the same insidious operations of psy-
chopathological phenomena. We shall deal with this question
toward the end of this book.
A colony of insects, no matter how well-organized socially,
is doomed to extinction whenever its collective instinct contin-
ues to operate according to the psychogenetic code, although
the biological meaning has disappeared. If, for instance, a
queen bee does not affect her nuptial flight in time because the
weather has been particularly bad, she begins laying unfertil-
ized eggs which will hatch nothing but drones. The bees con-
tinue to defend their queen, as required by their instinct; of
course, and when the worker bees die out the hive becomes
extinct.
At that point, only a “higher authority” in the shape of a
beekeeper can save such a hive. He must find and destroy the
82
SOME INDESPENSIBLE CONCEPTS
drone queen and insinuate a healthy fertilized queen into the
hive along with a few of her young workers. A net is required
for a few days to protect such a queen and her providers from
being stung by those bees loyal to the old queen. Then the hive
instinct accepts the new one. The apiarist generally suffers a
few painful stings in the process.
The following question derives from the above comparison:
Can the human hive inhabiting our globe achieve sufficient
comprehension of macrosocial pathological phenomenon
which is so dangerous, abhorrent, and fascinating at the same
time, before it is too late? At present, our individual and collec-
tive instincts and our natural psychological and moral world