Система убеждения. Как влиять на людей с помощью психологии

Koenigs, M. & Tranel, D. (2008). Prefrontal cortex damage abolishes brand-cued changes in cola preference. , 3 (1), 1–6.

Kolenda N., McGinnis L., Glibkowski B. (2012). Knowledge transfer antecedents and consequences: A conceptual model. Working paper.

Krosnick, J. A., Betz, A. L., Jussim, L. J., Lynn, A. R. & Stephens, L. (1992). Subliminal conditioning of attitudes. , 18(2), 152–162.

Kühn, S., Müller, B. C., van Baaren, R. B., Wietzker, A., Dijksterhuis, A., & Brass, M. (2010). Why do I like you when you behave like me? Neural mechanisms mediating positive consequences of observing someone being imitated. , 5(4), 384–392.

Lakin, J. L., Je eris, V. E., Cheng, C. M. & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. , 27 (3), 145–162.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. , 4(2), 195–208.

Langer, E., Blank, A. & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of "placebic" information in interpersonal interaction. , 36(6), 635–642.

Latané, B. & Darley, J. M. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander inter­vention in emergencies. , 10 (3), 215–221.

Lee, L., Frederick, S. & Ariely, D. (2006). Try it, you'll like it: The influence of expectation, consumption, and revelation on preferences for beer. , 17 (12), 1054–1058.

Lee, A. Y. & Labroo, A. A. (2004). The effect of conceptual and perceptual fluency on brand evaluation. , 151–165.

Leippe, M. R. & Eisenstadt, D. (1994). Generalization of dissonance reduction: Decreasing prejudice through induced compliance. , 67 (3), 395–413.

Lindgaard, G., Fernandes, G., Dudek, C. & Brown, J. (2006). Attention web designers: You have 50 milliseconds to make a good first impre­ssion! , 25(2), 115–126.

Lynn, M. & McCall, M. (2009). Techniques for increasing servers' tips: How generalizable are they? , 50(2), 198–208.

MacInnis, D. J., Moorman, C. & Jaworski, B. J. (1991). Enhancing and measuring consumers' motivation, opportunity, and ability to process brand information from ads. , 32–53.

Mackie, D. M. & Worth, L. T. (1991). Feeling good, but not thinking straight: The impact of positive mood on persuasion. , 23, 210–219.

Macrae, C. N. & Johnston, L. (1998). Help, I need somebody: Automatic action and inaction. , 16 (4), 400–417.

Madey, S. F., Simo, M., Dillworth, D., Kemper, D., Toczynski, A. & Perella, A. (1996). They do get more attractive at closing time, but only when you are not in a relationship. , 18 (4), 387–393.

Martin, P. Y., Hamilton, V. E., McKimmie, B. M., Terry, D. J. & Martin, R. (2007). Effects of caffeine on persuasion and attitude change: The role of secondary tasks in manipulating systematic message processing. , 37 (2), 320–338.

McClure, S. M., Li, J., Tomlin, D., Cypert, K. S., Montague, L. M. & Montague, P. R. (2004). Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. , 44 (2), 379–387.

McDaniel, M. A., Einstein, G. O., DeLosh, E. L., May, C. P. & Brady, P. (1995). The bizarreness effect: It's not surprising, it's complex. , 21 (2), 422.

McFerran, B., Dahl, D. W., Fitzsimons, G. J. & Morales, A. C. (2010a). Might an overweight waitress make you eat more? How the body type of others is sufficient to alter our food consumption. , 20 (2), 146.

McFerran, B., Dahl, D. W., Fitzsimons, G. J. & Morales, A. C. (2010b). I'll have what she's having: Effects of social influence and body type on the food choices of others. , 36 (6), 915–929.

McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contem­porary approaches. , 1, 192–229.

Meier, B. P. & Robinson, M. D. (2004). Why the sunny side is up: Associations between affect and vertical position. , 15 (4), 243–247.

Meston, C. M. & Frohlich, P. F. (2003). Love at first fright: Partner salience moderates roller-coaster-induced excitation transfer. , 32 (6), 537–544.

Milgram, S. (1973). Behavioral study of obedience. , 67(4), 371–378.

Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. , 63, 81–97.