Sulimirski Т., см. Сулимирский Т. Surowiecki W-, см. Суровецкий В. Svoboda В. 165 Szabo М 165
Szczukin М., см. Щукин М.Б. Szulek В., см. Шулек Б. Szydlowski 1 200 Szydlowski J. 199 Szymanski W., см. Шиманьский В.
Taskenberg К 199 Tejral J., см. Тейрал Я. Terstenjak D-, см. Терстеняк Д. Thomas S. 232, 283 Todorovid J 165
Tovar А., см. Товар А.
Trager G.L., см. Трагер Г. Trbuhovic V 59 Treimer К., см. Треймер К. Trubetzkoy N.S , см. Трубецкой Н.С. Trump D.H. 134
Tymieniecki К., см. Тымеиецкнй К.
Udolph J., см. Удольф Ю.
Utaszyn Н., см. Улашин Г. UslarR. 134
Van Wifk К, см. Ван Вейк Н. Vifia Z., см. Ваня 3.
VasitR. 133
Vasmer М. , см. Фасмер М. Vincentii, см. Вннцентий Кадлу- бек
Vocel ТЕ., см. Воцель Я.Э. Vyhnanek I. 93
Wage Т. 135 Wahle Е., см. Вале Э.
Wankel К, см. Ванкель Г. Wenskus R. 134 Wemer J., см. Вернер fl. Wierc’ifiski А., см. Верцинский А. Wiesner 3. 92 Wo^giewicz R. 232 Woiniak Z., см. Вожняк 3. Wrona-Kuprowska T 93
Zaborowski M., см. Заборовашй М
Zaharia Е. 232
Zaimov J., см. Займов Й.
Zeuss К., см. Цейс К.
Zielonka В. 165 Zosim 232 Zupan J. 55
Valentin V. Sedov. Slavs in Antiquity
Археология Европы
Comments
Назад
К оглавлению книги В. В. Седова «Славяне в древности»
Summary
In the fust chapter of the book the development of knowledge about the origin and ancient history of Slavs is considered. It begins with the analysis of the Roman and medieval authors’ ideas on the beginning of Slavdom and concludes with the historiographic situation in the late 20th century. The chapter has the following sections; «Ancient Authors about Early Slavs» (p 5); «Notions about Ancient Slavs in the Chronicles and Historical Writings of Middle Ages» (p. 8); «Prom Mavro Orbini to P-J.Safafik» (p. 13); «From PJ.&afafik to L.Niederle» (p. 18); «Lubor Niederle and his Time» (p. 25); «The Investigations of the 20—50-es» (p. 32); «The Last Decades of the 20th Century» (p. 40).
In the chapter «Ethnogenesology of Slavs» (p. 60) the contemporary state of the problem of Slavs’ origin and early history is analysed. The potentialities of different disciplines in the investigation of this problem are appraised: lin-guistics, onomastics, ethnology, archaeology, an-thropology, history, folkloristics. It is beyond doubt that this problem may be solved only by means of cooperation of all these disciplines, two of them being leading today — linguistics (the questions of glottogenesis) and archaeolo¬gy (the study of cultural development of certain population in the concrete territorial and chronological circumstances).
The prehistory of Slavs is characterized in the chapter «Ancient Europeans» (p. 95). It begins with the timepoint of the 2nd millennium B.C. when the Central European community of Urnfleld cultures existed. It is identified with Ancient Europeans of H.Krahe — an ethnolinguistic community, which united a big group of tribes speaking similar ancient Indo- European dialects. In the late 2nd — first half of the 1st millennium B.C. Celts, Italics, Venets, lUirians, Germanians, Western Balts and Slavs appeared from this conglomeration.
The question of Slavs’ formation is considered in details in the next chapter (p. 136). Slavs as a separate ethnos were being formed about the middle of the 1st millennium B.C. on the basis of Lusatian (Lausitz) culture, which belonged to the Central European community of Umfield cultures. Podkloszove Burials cul¬ture (Middle and Upper Vistula with Right- bank Oder) was the first Slavonic one.