Gerbner, George et al.
1979. The demonstration of power: violence profile no. 10 //Journal of Communication, 29.Gerbner, George et al.
1980. The «mainstreaming» of America: violence profile no. 11 // Journal of Communication, 30.Gershuny, J. I. and J. D. Miles
1983. The New Service Economy: The Transformation of Employment in Industrial Societies. London: Frances Pinter.Gershuny, Jonathan et al.
1994. The domestic labour revolution: a process of lagged adapation // Michael Anderson, Frank Bechofer and Jonathan Gershuny (eds.). The Social and Political Economy of the Household. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Gibbons, John H.
1990. Trading Around the Clock: Global Securities Markets and Information Technology. Washington DC: US Congress.Giddens, Anthony
1984. The Constitution of Society. Cambridge: Polity.Gillan, Audrey
1999. Shelter backs rethink on homeless // Guardian, 15 November.Ginn, Jay et al.
1996. Feminist fallacies: a reply to Hakim on women’s employment // British Journal of Sociology, 47.Ginzburg, Carlo
1980. The Cheese and the Worms. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Gittings, Danny
1999. Mickey Mouse invasion // Guardian, 3 November.Giujjfre, Patti A and Christine L. Williams
1994. Boundary lines: labeling sexual harassment in restaurants // Gender and Society, 8.Glasgow Media Group
1976. Bad News. London: Routledge.Glass, David
(ed.) 1954. Social Mobility in Britain. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Glueck, Sheldon W. and Eleanor Glueck
1956. Physique and Delinquency. N. Y.: Harper and Row.Goffman Erving
1968. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Goffman Erving
1969. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Goffman Erving
1971. Relations in Public: Micro-studies of the Public Order. London: Alien Lane.Goffman Erving
1974. Frame Analysis. N. Y.: Harper and Row.Goffman Erving
1981. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Goldstein, Paul J.
1979. Prostitution and. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath.Goldthorpe, John H.
1983. Women and class analysis: in defence of the conventional view // Sociology, 17.Goldthorpe, John H. and Gordon Marshall
1992. The promising future of class analysis // Sociology, 26.Goldthorpe, John H. and Clive Payne
1986. Trends in intergenerational class mobility in England and Wales 1972–1983 // Sociology, 20.Goldthorpe, John H. with Catriona Llewellyn and Clive Payne
1980. Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2nd edn 1987.Goldthorpe, John H. et al.
1968–1969. The Affluent Worker in the Class Structure, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Goleman Daniel
1996. Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More than IQ. London: Bloomsbury.Goodhardt, G.J., A. S. C. Ehrenbetg and M.A. Collins
1987. The Television Audience. 2nd edn. London: Gower.Gotrz, Andre
1982. Farewell to the Working Class. London: Pluto.Gottfredson, Michael R. and Travis Hirschi
1990. A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.Gould, Stephen Jay
1995. Curveball // Steven Fraser (ed.). The Bell Curve Wars: Race, Intelligence and the Future of America. N. Y.: Basic Books.Grabosky, P. N. and Russell G. Smith
1998. Crime in the Digital Age: Controlling Telecommunications and Cyberspace Illegalities. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction.Graeff Roger
1989. Talking Blues. London: Collins.Graham, Heather
1987. Women’s smoking and family health // Social Science and Medicine, 25.Graham, Heather
1994. Gender and class as dimensions of smoking behaviour in Britain: insights from a survey of mothers // Social Science and Medicine, 38.Greenblat, Cathy Stein
1983. A hit is a hit... or is it? Approval and tolerance of the use of physical force by spouses // David Finkelhor et al. (eds.). The Dark Side of Families: Current Family Violence Research. Beverly Hills, Calif: Sage.Grint, Keith
1991. The Sociology of Work. Cambridge: Polity.Grusky, David B. and Robert M. Hauser
1984. Comparative social mobility revisited: models of convergence and divergence in 16 countries //American Sociological Review, 49-