[3]
[4] Cf. S. A. Barton.
[5] Var. Σαρακηνοί as a tribe.
[6] Cureton,
[7] The powerful Shammar of the present day, some who live in Nejd, the ancient home of the tribe, and some in the Mesopotamian desert, belong to the Tai.
[8] That whole peoples should be called after certain frontier tribes by neighbouring nations is not altogether an unusual phenomenon, as everybody knows.
[9] These forms have to a certain extent survived to our own day, as the name of an Iranian people in Transirania and elsewhere, who accepted the Arab religion earlier than their neighbours and were consequently called “Arabs.” In the same way later Syrians often call all Moslems “Taits.”
[10]
[11] Migne,
[12] The proper translation of εὐδαὶμων in this connection. The usual
[13] The name was extended to the whole peninsula, a country extremely poor as a whole. Ἀραβία ἔρημος,
[14] Genesis xxxvii, 25.
[15]
[16] For a lively description of it see Wellhausen,
[17] See, for example, Joshua xi, 20; 1 Samuel xv, 33.
[18] S. Nilus in Migne,
[19] The translation of
[20] The historical works of this admirable scholar deserve the strongest recommendation, particularly his
[21] Babylonia (Arab Irak) should not be included, as is often done, in the term Mesopotamia, which last should be restricted to the very different region to the north, known in Arabic as Jezira.
[22] The portions of northern Africa west of Egypt and the Moslem parts of western Europe (Spain).
[23] “All men are become Arabs” was said in the year 728 or 729, in reference to an Iranian stock converted to Islam. Those who thus spoke would have used the word
[24] Goldziher has rendered a most important service by proving how slight the importance of this form is on purely historic grounds, and how everything that passed as valid in certain circles was ascribed without more ado to the prophet himself. See particularly Part II of his
[25] But “the most precious heritage in art, poetry, and history, which the Greek spirit has bequeathed to us was never accessible to Orientals.” (T. J. de Boer,
[26] The Arabs deserve great credit for the mere fact that they adopted that brilliant invention, the Hindu numerical system, and passed it on to the Europeans. It is singular that the latter continued so frequently to employ the extremely inconvenient Roman numerals.
[27] Cf. Snoucke-Hurgronge,
[28] Cf. de Goeje,
HISTORY IN OUTLINE OF PARTHIANS, SASSANIDS, AND ARABS