Читаем This Much Is True полностью

I remained in touch with the Leavises. Frank Leavis was never made a Professor at Cambridge. He was never elected to a higher status than Reader at the university, because there was such combined opposition to him. He had to fight every step of the way. But to his students, he was, and is, a hero. Dr Leavis was, above all, a superb teacher. He opened the delights of English literature to me and thereby enriched my life. At his final lecture, the hall was packed, people standing in rows when all the seats had been filled. His slight figure, gown billowing, came out. He gave the lecture, and then paused. ‘I’ve come to the end,’ he said, with his characteristic dying cadence. ‘And this is the End.’ Not a dry eye in the house.

I always felt that Cambridge belonged to me — to me, personally: it was my Cambridge. Cambridge gave me everything that I have. It gave me knowledge, friends, emotional excitement; it was an extraordinary time — exactly as it should have been. And in a professional sense, it was the study of Dickens that I undertook whilst there that would prove vital to my career, leading to the show I wrote with Sonia Fraser, Dickens’ Women.

I feel emotional about Cambridge and Newnham. Whenever I return to the city I’m in tears, because I see around every corner the ghosts of the people I knew, the ghost of myself riding down Sidgwick Avenue on my bicycle. It was a time when I was fully alive, when I became fully myself — it gave me the person I am.

Footlights

My Cambridge days were not a time of unadulterated joy, however. I lost my smile a little when I performed in the Footlights review of 1962, which was called Double Take. I didn’t like the Footlights boys, and they really didn’t like me. They made that obvious. At that time, and indeed the whole time I was at Cambridge, a woman could not be a member of the Footlights Club: girls were not welcome; we attended as guests. The first female member of the Footlights was Germaine Greer in 1964, the year after I left the university.

It’s a club with a fine reputation and powerful professional influence in the world of light entertainment. Many great comedians started at Footlights: Stephen Fry, Peter Cook, John Cleese, David Frost, Hugh Laurie, Eric Idle, all the Goodies. Every summer term a revue is produced and goes to the Edinburgh Fringe, and often to Broadway and further afield. Throughout the year, ‘Smokers’ are held: informal concerts where students try out their material and hope to be noticed for possible inclusion in the revue. It is intensely competitive.

When I was asked to audition for the revue, I was delighted if apprehensive. Mummy was overjoyed. She phoned the Oxford Mail and gave an interview to them about my brilliance. That didn’t make me popular with the lads! I wasn’t sure what my role could be. I can’t sing or dance, I wasn’t beautiful, but I knew I could be funny. The trouble was, they didn’t really want ‘the girl’ to be funny — and that’s all I knew how to be. The publicity photo was of me emerging from a gents’ loo with a finger to my lips. Good photo, silly idea.

I was the only girl in the show. I was a pert little madam and I thought I was as good as they were — and they didn’t. They thought I was a jumped-up, pushy, over-confident, fat little Jew. But I was funny, and they didn’t like it. If you think about it, their Monty Python programmes didn’t feature funny women, only the occasional dolly bird. And I certainly wasn’t that.

Their attitudes towards women stemmed from the minor public schools most of them had attended. They weren’t used to dealing with strong, opinionated women. This was before feminism: women were not meant to be funny; they were meant to be decorative. These chaps wanted to sleep with women, not compete with them. I was neither decorative nor bedworthy, and they found me unbearable. The problem was exacerbated by my excellent notices, which were resented. It was actually tangible — the level of competition sharpened. They acknowledged each other’s cleverness, but only just, and there was considerable class antagonism. David Frost was looked down on, for example, because he was merely a middle-class lad from Gillingham, and they were not happy when Clive James arrived during the Sixties. His brilliance was unstoppable, but they disparaged his Australian roots — a shortcoming that allowed Clive to be the object of their disdain. But it was like water off a duck’s back with Clive; he had no respect for any of them. And they quickly changed their minds about his acceptability.

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

100 великих кумиров XX века
100 великих кумиров XX века

Во все времена и у всех народов были свои кумиры, которых обожали тысячи, а порой и миллионы людей. Перед ними преклонялись, стремились быть похожими на них, изучали биографии и жадно ловили все слухи и известия о знаменитостях.Научно-техническая революция XX века серьёзно повлияла на формирование вкусов и предпочтений широкой публики. С увеличением тиражей газет и журналов, появлением кино, радио, телевидения, Интернета любая информация стала доходить до людей гораздо быстрее и в большем объёме; выросли и возможности манипулирования общественным сознанием.Книга о ста великих кумирах XX века — это не только и не столько сборник занимательных биографических новелл. Это прежде всего рассказы о том, как были «сотворены» кумиры новейшего времени, почему их жизнь привлекала пристальное внимание современников. Подбор персоналий для данной книги отражает любопытную тенденцию: кумирами народов всё чаще становятся не монархи, политики и полководцы, а спортсмены, путешественники, люди искусства и шоу-бизнеса, известные модельеры, иногда писатели и учёные.

Игорь Анатольевич Мусский

Биографии и Мемуары / Энциклопедии / Документальное / Словари и Энциклопедии
100 Великих Феноменов
100 Великих Феноменов

На свете есть немало людей, сильно отличающихся от нас. Чаще всего они обладают даром целительства, реже — предвидения, иногда — теми способностями, объяснить которые наука пока не может, хотя и не отказывается от их изучения. Особая категория людей-феноменов демонстрирует свои сверхъестественные дарования на эстрадных подмостках, цирковых аренах, а теперь и в телемостах, вызывая у публики восторг, восхищение и удивление. Рядовые зрители готовы объявить увиденное волшебством. Отзывы учёных более чем сдержанны — им всё нужно проверить в своих лабораториях.Эта книга повествует о наиболее значительных людях-феноменах, оставивших заметный след в истории сверхъестественного. Тайны их уникальных способностей и возможностей не раскрыты и по сей день.

Николай Николаевич Непомнящий

Биографии и Мемуары