Читаем Убийство в «Восточном экспрессе» / Murder on the Orient Express полностью

“It has this advantage,” said Poirot. “If you confront anyone who has lied with the truth, he will usually admit it – often out of sheer surprise. It is only necessary to guess right to produce your effect.

“That is the only way to conduct this case.

I select each passenger in turn, consider his or her evidence, and say to myself, ‘If so and so is lying, on what point is he lying, and what is the reason for the lie?’ And I answer, ‘If he is lying – if, you mark – it could only be for such a reason and on such a point.’ We have done that once very successfully with Countess Andrenyi. We shall now proceed to try the same method on several other persons.”

“And supposing, my friend, that your guess happens to be wrong?”

“Then one person, at any rate, will be completely freed from suspicion.”

“Ah! – a process of elimination.”

“Exactly.”

“And whom do we tackle next?”

“We are going to tackle that pukka sahib, Colonel Arbuthnot.”

<p>Chapter 6</p><p>A Second Interview With Colonel Arbuthnot</p>

Colonel Arbuthnot was clearly annoyed at being summoned to the dining-car for a second interview. His face wore a most forbidding expression as he sat down and said:

“Well?”

“All my apologies for troubling you a second time,” said Poirot. “But there is still some information that I think you might be able to give us.”

“Indeed? I hardly think so.”

“To begin with, you see this pipe-cleaner?”

“Yes.”

“Is it one of yours?”

“Don’t know. I don’t put a private mark on them, you know.”

“Are you aware, Colonel Arbuthnot, that you are the only man amongst the passengers in the Stamboul – Calais carriage who smokes a pipe?”

“In that case it probably is one of mine.”

“Do you know where it was found?”

“Not the least idea.”

“It was found by the body of the murdered man.”

Colonel Arbuthnot raised his eyebrows.

“Can you tell us, Colonel Arbuthnot, how it is likely to have got there?”

“If you mean, did I drop it there myself, no, I didn’t.”

“Did you go into Mr. Ratchett’s compartment at any time?”

“I never even spoke to the man.”

“You never spoke to him and you did not murder him?”

The colonel’s eyebrows went up again sardonically.

“If I had, I should hardly be likely to acquaint you with the fact. As a matter of fact I didn’t murder the fellow.”

“Ah, well,” murmured Poirot. “It is of no consequence.”

“I beg your pardon?”

“I said that it was of no consequence.”

“Oh!” Arbuthnot looked taken aback. He eyed Poirot uneasily.

“Because, you see,” continued the little man, “the pipe-cleaner, it is of no importance. I can myself think of eleven other excellent explanations of its presence.”

Arbuthnot stared at him.

“What I really wished to see you about was quite another matter,” went on Poirot. “Miss Debenham may have told you, perhaps, that I overheard some words spoken to you at the station of Konya?”

Arbuthnot did not reply.

“She said, ‘Not now. When it’s all over. When it’s behind us!’ Do you know to what those words referred?”

“I am sorry, M. Poirot, but I must refuse to answer that question.”

“Pourquoi?”

The Colonel said stiffly, “I suggest that you ask Miss Debenham herself for the meaning of those words.”

“I have done so.”

“And she refused to tell you?”

“Yes.”

“Then I should think it would have been perfectly plain – even to you – that my lips are sealed.”

“You will not give away a lady’s secret?”

“You can put it that way, if you like.”

“Miss Debenham told me that they referred to a private matter of her own.”

“Then why not accept her word for it?”

“Because, Colonel Arbuthnot, Miss Debenham is what one might call a highly suspicious character.”

“Nonsense,” said the Colonel with warmth.

“It is not nonsense.”

“You have nothing whatever against her.”

“Not the fact that Miss Debenham was companion governess; in the Armstrong household at the time of the kidnapping of little Daisy Armstrong?”

There was a minute’s dead silence.

Poirot nodded his head gently.

“You see,” he said. “We know more than you think. If Miss Debenham is innocent, why did she conceal that fact? Why did she tell me that she had never been in America?”

The Colonel cleared his throat.

“Aren’t you possibly making a mistake?”

“I am making no mistake. Why did Miss Debenham lie to me?”

Colonel Arbuthnot shrugged his shoulders.

“You had better ask her. I still think that you are wrong.”

Poirot raised his voice and called. One of the restaurant attendants came from the far end of the car.

“Go and ask the English lady in No. 11 if she will be good enough to come here.”

“Bien, Monsieur.”

The man departed. The four men sat in silence. Colonel Arbuthnot’s face looked as though it were carved out of wood, rigid and impassive.

The man returned.

“The lady is just coming, Monsieur.”

“Thank you.”

A minute or two later Mary Debenham entered the dining-car.

<p>Chapter 7</p><p>The Identity Of Mary Debenham</p>
Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Билингва Bestseller

Убийство в «Восточном экспрессе» / Murder on the Orient Express
Убийство в «Восточном экспрессе» / Murder on the Orient Express

Находившийся в Стамбуле великий сыщик Эркюль Пуаро возвращается в Англию на знаменитом «Восточном экспрессе», в котором вместе с ним едут, кажется, представители всех возможных национальностей. Один из пассажиров, неприятный американец по фамилии Рэтчетт, предлагает Пуаро стать телохранителем, поскольку считает, что его должны убить. Знаменитый бельгиец отмахивается от этой абсурдной просьбы. А на следующий день американца находят мертвым в своем купе, причем двери закрыты, а окно открыто. Пуаро немедленно берется за расследование – и выясняет, что купе полно всевозможных улик, указывающих… практически на всех пассажиров «Восточного экспресса». Вдобавок поезд наглухо застревает в снежных заносах в безлюдном месте. Пуаро необходимо найти убийцу до того, как экспресс продолжит свой путь…В формате PDF A4 сохранён издательский дизайн.

Агата Кристи

Языкознание, иностранные языки

Похожие книги

Агония и возрождение романтизма
Агония и возрождение романтизма

Романтизм в русской литературе, вопреки тезисам школьной программы, – явление, которое вовсе не исчерпывается художественными опытами начала XIX века. Михаил Вайскопф – израильский славист и автор исследования «Влюбленный демиург», послужившего итоговым стимулом для этой книги, – видит в романтике непреходящую основу русской культуры, ее гибельный и вместе с тем живительный метафизический опыт. Его новая книга охватывает столетний период с конца романтического золотого века в 1840-х до 1940-х годов, когда катастрофы XX века оборвали жизни и литературные судьбы последних русских романтиков в широком диапазоне от Булгакова до Мандельштама. Первая часть работы сфокусирована на анализе литературной ситуации первой половины XIX столетия, вторая посвящена творчеству Афанасия Фета, третья изучает различные модификации романтизма в предсоветские и советские годы, а четвертая предлагает по-новому посмотреть на довоенное творчество Владимира Набокова. Приложением к книге служит «Пропащая грамота» – семь небольших рассказов и стилизаций, написанных автором.

Михаил Яковлевич Вайскопф

Языкознание, иностранные языки