Читаем Убийство в «Восточном экспрессе» / Murder on the Orient Express полностью

“It is true – it is true,” wept the wretched woman. “Ah, she was an angel – a little sweet trustful angel. She knew nothing but kindness and love – and she was taken away by that wicked man – cruelly treated – and her poor mother – and the other little one who never lived at all. You cannot understand – you cannot know – if you had been there as I was – if you had seen the whole terrible tragedy! I ought to have told you the truth about myself this morning. But I was afraid – afraid. I did so rejoice that that evil man was dead – that he could not any more kill or torture little children. Ah! I cannot speak – I have no words…”

She wept with more vehemence than ever.

Poirot continued to pat her gently on the shoulder.

“There – there – I comprehend – I comprehend everything – everything, I tell you. I will ask you no more questions. It is enough that you have admitted what I know to be the truth. I understand, I tell you.”

By now inarticulate with sobs, Greta Ohlsson rose and groped her way towards the door. As she reached it she collided with a man coming in.

It was the valet – Masterman. He came straight up to Poirot and spoke in his usual quiet, unemotional voice’.

“I hope I’m not intruding, sir. I thought it best to come along at once, sir, and tell you the truth. I was Colonel Armstrong’s batman in the War, sir, and afterwards I was his valet in New York. I’m afraid I concealed that fact this morning. It was very wrong of me, sir, and I thought I’d better come and make a clean breast of it. But I hope, sir, that you’re not suspecting Tonio in any way. Old Tonio, sir, wouldn’t hurt a fly. And I can swear positively that he never left the carriage all last night. So, you see, sir, he couldn’t have done it. Tonio may be a foreigner, sir, but he’s a very gentle creature. Not like those nasty murdering Italians one reads about.”

He stopped.

Poirot looked steadily at him. “Is that all you have to say?”

“That is all, sir.”

He paused; then, as Poirot did not speak, he made an apologetic little bow and after a momentary hesitation left the dining-car in the same quiet unobtrusive fashion as he had come.

“This,” said Dr. Constantine, “is more wildly improbable than any roman policier I have ever read.”

“I agree,” said M. Bouc. “Of the twelve passengers in that coach, nine have been proved to have had a connection with the Armstrong case. What next, I ask you? Or should I say, who next?”

“I can almost give you the answer to your question,” said Poirot. “Here comes our American sleuth, Mr. Hardman.”

“Is he, too, coming to confess?”

Before Poirot could reply the American had reached their table. He cocked an alert eye at them and sitting down he drawled out:

“Just exactly what’s up on this train? It seems bughouse to me.”

Poirot twinkled at him.

“Are you quite sure, Mr. Hardman, that you yourself were not the gardener at the Armstrong home?”

“They didn’t have a garden,” replied Mr. Hardman literally.

“Or the butler?”

“Haven’t got the fancy manners for a place like that. No, I never had any connection with the Armstrong house – but I’m beginning to believe I’m about the only one on this train who hadn’t! Can you beat it? That’s what I say – can you beat it?”

“It is certainly a little surprising,” said Poirot mildly.

“C’est rigolo,” burst from M. Bouc.

“Have you any ideas of your own about the crime, Mr. Hardman?” inquired Poirot.

“No, sir. It’s got me beat. I don’t know how to figure it out. They can’t all be in it – but which one is the guilty party is beyond me. How did you get wise to all this? That’s what I want to know.”

“I just guessed.”

“Then, believe me, you’re a pretty slick guesser. Yes, I’ll tell the world you’re a slick guesser.”

Mr. Hardman leaned back and looked at Poirot admiringly.

“You’ll excuse me,” he said, “but no one would believe it to look at you. I take off my hat to you. I do indeed.”

“You are too kind, M. Hardman.”

“Not at all. I’ve got to hand it to you.”

“All the same,” said Poirot, “the problem is not yet quite solved. Can we say with authority that we know who killed M. Ratchett?”

“Count me out,” said Mr. Hardman. “I’m not saying anything at all. I’m just full of natural admiration. What about the other two you haven’t had a guess at yet? The old American dame, and the lady’s-maid? I suppose we can take it that they’re the only innocent parties on the train?”

“Unless,” said Poirot, smiling, “we can fit them into our little collection as – shall we say— housekeeper and cook in the Armstrong household?”

“Well, nothing in the world would surprise me now,” said Mr. Hardman with quiet resignation. “Bughouse – that’s what this business is – bughouse!”

“Ah! mon cher, that would be indeed stretching coincidence a little too far,” said M. Bouc. “They cannot all be in it.”

Poirot looked at him.

“You do not understand,” he said. “You do not understand at all. Tell me, do you know who killed Ratchett?”

“Do you?” countered M. Bouc.

Poirot nodded.

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Билингва Bestseller

Убийство в «Восточном экспрессе» / Murder on the Orient Express
Убийство в «Восточном экспрессе» / Murder on the Orient Express

Находившийся в Стамбуле великий сыщик Эркюль Пуаро возвращается в Англию на знаменитом «Восточном экспрессе», в котором вместе с ним едут, кажется, представители всех возможных национальностей. Один из пассажиров, неприятный американец по фамилии Рэтчетт, предлагает Пуаро стать телохранителем, поскольку считает, что его должны убить. Знаменитый бельгиец отмахивается от этой абсурдной просьбы. А на следующий день американца находят мертвым в своем купе, причем двери закрыты, а окно открыто. Пуаро немедленно берется за расследование – и выясняет, что купе полно всевозможных улик, указывающих… практически на всех пассажиров «Восточного экспресса». Вдобавок поезд наглухо застревает в снежных заносах в безлюдном месте. Пуаро необходимо найти убийцу до того, как экспресс продолжит свой путь…В формате PDF A4 сохранён издательский дизайн.

Агата Кристи

Языкознание, иностранные языки

Похожие книги

Агония и возрождение романтизма
Агония и возрождение романтизма

Романтизм в русской литературе, вопреки тезисам школьной программы, – явление, которое вовсе не исчерпывается художественными опытами начала XIX века. Михаил Вайскопф – израильский славист и автор исследования «Влюбленный демиург», послужившего итоговым стимулом для этой книги, – видит в романтике непреходящую основу русской культуры, ее гибельный и вместе с тем живительный метафизический опыт. Его новая книга охватывает столетний период с конца романтического золотого века в 1840-х до 1940-х годов, когда катастрофы XX века оборвали жизни и литературные судьбы последних русских романтиков в широком диапазоне от Булгакова до Мандельштама. Первая часть работы сфокусирована на анализе литературной ситуации первой половины XIX столетия, вторая посвящена творчеству Афанасия Фета, третья изучает различные модификации романтизма в предсоветские и советские годы, а четвертая предлагает по-новому посмотреть на довоенное творчество Владимира Набокова. Приложением к книге служит «Пропащая грамота» – семь небольших рассказов и стилизаций, написанных автором.

Михаил Яковлевич Вайскопф

Языкознание, иностранные языки