Ум в движении. Как действие формирует мысль

Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1996). What architects see in their sketches: Implications for design tools. Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 191–192). Vancouver, BC, Canada: ACM. doi:10.1145/257089.257255.

Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (1997). What do architects and students perceive in their sketches? A protocol analysis. Design Studies, 18, 385–403.

Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (2002). How do designers shift their focus of attention in their own sketches? In M. Anderson, B. Meyer, & P. Olivier (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and reasoning (pp. 241–254). London, England: Springer.

Tversky, B., & Suwa, M. (2009). Thinking with sketches. In A. B. Markman & K. L. Wood (Eds.), Tools for innovation: The science behind the practical methods that drive new ideas. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Эффективная стратегия: перегруппировка частей

Suwa, M., Tversky, B., Gero, J., & Purcell, T. (2001). Seeing into sketches: Regrouping parts encourages new interpretations. In J. S. Gero, B. Tversky, & T. Purcell (Eds.), Visual and spatial reasoning in design (pp. 207–219). Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition.

Конструктивное восприятие

Suwa, M., & Tversky, B. (2003). Constructive perception: A metacognitive skill for coordinating perception and conception. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 25(25).

Tversky, B., & Suwa, M. (2009). Thinking with sketches. In A. B. Markman & K. L. Wood (Eds.), Tools for innovation: The science behind the practical methods that drive new ideas. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Креативность: поиск новых идей

Chou, J. Y., & Tversky, B. (n. d.). Top-down strategies outperform bottom-up strategies for finding new interpretations. Unpublished manuscript.

Tversky, B. (2015). On abstraction and ambiguity. In J. Gero (Ed.), Studying Visual and Spatial Reasoning for Design Creativity (pp. 215–223). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.

Tversky, B., & Chou, J. Y. (2011). Creativity: Depth and breadth. In T. Taura & Y. Nagai (Eds.), Design Creativity 2010 (pp. 209–214). London, England: Springer.

Zahner, D., Nickerson, J. V., Tversky, B., Corter, J. E., & Ma, J. (2010). A fix for fixation? Rerepresenting and abstracting as creative processes in the design of information systems. AI EDAM, 24(2), 231–244.

Блуждание ума

Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science, 23(10), 1117–1122.

Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., & Schooler, J. W. (2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(21), 8719–8724.

Mrazek, M. D., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Mindfulness and mind-wandering: Finding convergence through opposing constructs. Emotion, 12(3), 442.

Архитекторы в роли кондитеров

A new school of pastry chefs got its start in architecture. (2018, January 24). New York Times. Взято с сайта https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/23/dining/pastry-chefs-architecture.html.

Смена парадигм

Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Сдвиг перспективы ведет к открытию

Mukherjee, S. (2017, September 11). Cancer’s invasion equation. The New Yorker. Взято с сайта https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/09/11/cancers-invasion-equation.

Сдвиг перспективы повышает способность к прогнозированию

Mellers, B., Stone, E., Murray, T., Minster, A., Rohrbaugh, N., Bishop, M., Ungar, L. (2015). Identifying and cultivating superforecasters as a method of improving probabilistic predictions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(3), 267–281.