22 Byne W. et al. The interstitial nuclei of the human anterior hypothalamus: An investigation of variation with sex, sexual orientation, and HIV status //
23 Roselli C. and Stormshak F. Prenatal programming of sexual partner preference: The ram model //
24 Alekseyenko O. et al. Bilateral damage to the sexually dimorphic medial preoptic area/anterior hypothalamus of male ferrets causes a female-typical preference for and a hypo-thalamic Fos response to male body odors //
25 Serovich J. et al. A systematic review of the research base on sexual reorientation therapies //
26 Haldeman D. The practice and ethics of sexual orientation conversion therapy //
27 Blanchard R. Fraternal birth order and the maternal immune hypothesis of male homosexuality //
28 Savic I. and Lindstrom P. PET and MRI show differences in cerebral asymmetry and functional connectivity between homo– and heterosexual subjects //
29 Berglund H. et al. Brain response to putative phero-mones in lesbian women //
30 American Psychological Association, 2005. Lesbian and Gay Parenting. Отчет доступен по ссылке:pi/lgbt/resources/parenting-full.pdf
31 Rosenfeld M. Nontraditional families and childhood progress through school //
32 Gates G. et al. Adoption and Foster Care by Gay and Lesbian Parents in the United States. The Urban Institute; Washington, DC: 2007. Отчет доступен по ссылке: http:// williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Gates-Badgett-Macomber-Chambers-Final-Adoption-Report-Mar-2007.pdf
33 Regnerus M. How different are the adult children of parents who have same-sex relationships? Findings from the New Family Structures Study //
34 Marina S. et al. Sharing motherhood: biological lesbian co-mothers, a new IVF indication //
35 Kono T. et al. Birth of parthenogenetic mice that can develop to adulthood //
36 Deng J. M. et al. Generation of Viable Male and Female Mice from Tw o Fathers //
37 Wilkins J Haig D. What good is genomic imprinting: the function of parent-specifc gene expression //
1 Windhager S. et al. Face to face. The perception of automotive designs //
2 Windhager S. et al. “Cars have their own faces”: cross-cultural ratings of car shapes in biological (stereotypical) terms //
3 Bateson M. et al. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting //
4 Rigdon M. et al. Minimal social cues in the dictator game //
5 Bekkers R. and Schuyt T. And who is your neighbor? Explaining denominational differences in charitable giving and volunteering in the Netherlands //
6 Wang L. and Graddy E. Social capital, volunteering, and charitable giving //
7 Bekkers R. Measuring altruistic behavior in surveys: the all-or-nothing dictator game //
8 Malhotra D. (When) are religious people nicer? Religious salience and the “Sunday Effect” on pro-social behavior //
9 Shariff A. and Norenzayan A. God is watching you. Priming God concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game //