glibly ['lbl], irritably ['rtbl], blew [blu:]

"That doesn't apply here either as far as I can see. Mrs. Ascher and Betty Barnard cannot be linked as members of the same class. Of course, it's possible that there is a sex complex. Both victims have been women. We can tell better, of course, after the next crime —"

"For God's sake, Thompson, don't speak so glibly of the next crime," said Sir Lionel irritably. "We're going to do all we can to prevent another crime."

Dr. Thompson held his peace and blew his nose with some violence. "Have it your own way," the noise seemed to say. "If you won't face facts —"

The Assistant Commissioner turned to Poirot. "I see what you're driving at, but I'm not quite clear yet."

"I ask myself," said Poirot (я спрашиваю себя), "what passes in itself exactly in the mind of the murderer (что происходит точно в самом мозгу убийцы)? He kills (он убивает), it would seem from his letters (это кажется /явным/ из его писем), pour le sport (фр. спорта ради) — to amuse himself (чтобы развлечься). Can that really be true (может ли это действительно быть правдой)? And even if it is true (и даже если это правда), on what principle does he select his victims (по какому принципу он отбирает свои жертвы) apart from the merely alphabetical one (кроме просто алфавитного)? If he kills merely to amuse himself (если он убивает, просто чтобы развлечься) he would not advertise the fact (он бы не стал афишировать этот факт), since (так как), otherwise (иначе/в противном случае), he could kill with impunity (он мог бы убивать безнаказанно). But no (но нет), he seeks (он стремится /к тому/; to seek — искать; добиваться), as we all agree (как мы все согласились), to make the splash in the public eye (произвести публичную сенсацию: «сенсацию на публике») — to assert his personality (чтобы утвердить свою личность).

In what way has his personality been suppressed (каким образом была его личность подавлена) that one can connect with the two victims (что можно объединить это с двумя жертвами) he has so far selected (которых он пока выбрал)? A final suggestion (последнее предположение): Is his motive direct personal hatred of me (является ли его мотив прямой личной ненавистью ко мне), of Hercule Poirot (Эркюлю Пуаро)? Does he challenge me in public (бросает ли он мне публичный вызов) because I have (потому, что я) (unknown to myself) (сам того не зная) vanquished him somewhere in the course of my career (одержал над ним верх где-то в течение моей карьеры; to vanquish — побеждать; покорять)? Or is his animosity impersonal (или его враждебность неличного характера) — directed against a foreigner (направленная против иностранца)? And if so (и если так), what again has led to that (что снова привело к этому; to lead)? What injury has he suffered at a foreigner's hand (от какой травмы, нанесенной рукой иностранца, он пострадал)?"

impunity [m'pju:nt], vanquish ['vaekw], animosity [aen'mst]

"I ask myself," said Poirot, "what passes in itself exactly in the mind of the murderer? He kills, it would seem from his letters, pour le sport — to amuse himself. Can that really be true? And even if it is true, on what principle does he select his victims apart from the merely alphabetical one? If he kills merely to amuse himself he would not advertise the fact, since, otherwise, he could kill with impunity. But no, he seeks, as we all agree, to make the splash in the public eye — to assert his personality.