see Di's doll. I'm glad! So glad I want to dance and sing. I'll never see her again.
But dear God how I wish I never had seen her! And still I don't know why.
This was the last reference to Madame Mandilip in Nurse Walters' diary. She died on the morning of
November 25.
CHAPTER IX: END OF THE PETERS DOLL
Braile had been watching me closely. I met his questioning gaze, and tried to conceal the perturbation
which the diary had aroused. I said:
"I never knew Walters had so imaginative a mind."
He flushed and asked angrily: "You think she was fictionizing?"
"Not fictionizing, exactly. Observing a series of ordinary occurrences through the glamour of an active
imagination would be a better way of putting it."
He said, incredulously, "You don't realize that what she has written is an authentic, even though
unconscious, description of an amazing piece of hypnotism?"
"The possibility did occur to me," I answered tartly. "But I find no actual evidence to support it. I do
perceive, however, that Walters was not so well balanced as I had supposed her. I do find evidence that
she was surprisingly emotional; that in at least one of her visits to this Madame Mandilip she was plainly
overwrought and in an extreme state of nervous instability. I refer to her most indiscreet discussion of the
Peters case, after she had been warned by me, you will remember, to say nothing of it to anyone
whatsoever."
"I remember it so well," he said, "that when I came to that part of the diary I had no further doubt of the
hypnotism. Nevertheless, go on."
"In considering two possible causes for any action, it is desirable to accept the more reasonable," I said,
dryly. "Consider the actual facts, Braile. Walters lays stress upon the odd conduct and warnings of the
girl. She admits the girl is a neurotic. Well, the conduct she describes is exactly what we would expect
from a neurotic. Walters is attracted by the dolls and goes in to price them, as anyone would. She is
acting under no compulsion. She meets a woman whose physical characteristics stimulate her
imagination-and arouse her emotionalism. She confides in her. This woman, evidently also of the
emotional type, likes her and makes her a present of a doll. The woman is an artist; she sees in Walters a
desirable model. She asks her to pose-still no compulsion and a natural request-and Walters does pose
for her. The woman has her technique, like all artists, and part of it is to make skeletons for the
framework of her dolls. A natural and intelligent procedure. The sight of the skeleton suggests death to
Walters, and the suggestion of death brings up the image of Peters which has been powerfully impressed
upon her imagination. She becomes momentarily hysterical-again evidence of her overwrought
condition. She takes tea with the doll-maker and is accidentally scalded. Naturally this arouses the
solicitude of her hostess and she dresses the scald with some unguent in whose efficacy she believes. And
that is all. Where in this entirely commonplace sequence of events is there evidence that Walters was
hypnotized? Finally, assuming that she was hypnotized, what evidence is there of motive?"
"She herself gave it," he said, "'to make a doll of you, my dear!'"
I had almost convinced myself by my argument, and this remark exasperated me.
"I suppose," I said, "you want me to believe that once lured into the shop, Walters was impelled by
occult arts to return until this Madame Mandilip's devilish purpose was accomplished. That the
compassionate shop-girl tried to save her from what the old melodramas called a fate worse than
death-although not precisely the fate they meant. That the doll she was to be given for her niece was the
bait on the hook of a sorceress. That it was necessary she be wounded so the witch's salve could be
applied. That it was the salve which carried the unknown death. That the first trap failing, the accident of
the tea-kettle was contrived and was successful. And that now Walters' soul is fluttering inside the witch's
mirror, just as she had dreamed. And all this, my dear Braile, is the most outrageous superstition!"
"Ah!" he said obliquely. "So those possibilities did occur to you after all? Your mind is not so fossilized as
a few moments ago I supposed."
I became still more exasperated.
"It is your theory that from the moment Walters entered the store, every occurrence she has narrated was
designed to give this Madame Mandilip possession of her soul, a design that was consummated by
Walters' death?"
He hesitated, and then said: "In essence-yes."
"A soul!" I mused, sardonically. "But I have never seen a soul. I know of no one whose evidence I would
credit who has seen a soul. What is a soul-if it exists? It is ponderable? Material? If your theory is
correct it must be. How could one gain possession of something which is both imponderables and
nonmaterial? How would one know one had it if it could not be seen nor weighed, felt nor measured, nor