Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

The onganda’s enclosure also included graves and sacred sites. One doesn’t need more to conclude of the over simplifiaction associated with the process of mimicking indigenous life embodied in the faked native’s village.[155] Santos Pereira’s huts were as shallow as those reproductions of villages built for colonial fairs and world exhibitions ready to be consumed as postcards by urban dwellers in Europe or North America. Independently of one’s position on the virtues and problems of the sociability of the Kuvale, the point is that the joyful lusotropicalist rhetoric attached to the PEC’s native village, with its claims about the unique Portuguese sensitivity toward traditional societies and their customs, consisted of empty words hiding a violent conversion of indigenous population into impoverished wage laborers working on white settlers’ farms. The acknowledged resistance of the Kuvale to being mobilized for such undertakings only confirms their understanding of what was at stake.

Figure 6.14 The Karakul Experiment Station in the Namibe Desert in Angola, ca. 1960.(Arquivo Instituto Português de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento / MU / DGE / RRN / 1548 / 06127)Figure 6.15 Manuel dos Santos Pereira’s instructions on how to build “indigenous huts,” 1958.(Arquivo Instituto Português de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento MU / DGE / RRN / 1548 / 16195)

The natives’ village was not the only element of the Karakul experiment station to be presented as exemplary of lusotropicalism. Gilberto Freyre also saw evidence of the unique adaptive nature of Portuguese settlers in the house of the director, which, he suggested, demonstrated that “it was possible for a Portuguese to live in Caracul in a true Oasis”:

Such was the residence of the Post’s director, all involved by creepers and a trellis with bunches of grapes so Portuguese fresh they looked fake…. The vines burst in fat grapes by the balcony at children’s hands and of grown ups nostalgic of the fruits and scents of Portugal.[156]

While Manuel dos Santos Pereira drove relentlessly through the reserve distributing genetic purity, inspecting barbed wire fences, evaluating pastures, and measuring the water levels of improvised ditches, his wife served ”magnificent lunches with the grace and dignity of someone who overlooked a dinner in Lisbon or Oporto.”[157] Compensating for the nomadism of a frontier life always on the move, and for the 9,000 miles dos Santos Pereira put on his Chevy truck every month, his wife and children, through their performance of metropolitan life, displayed the stability repetitively invoked in publicizing the joys of white settlement. Already in 1940, Bronislaw Malinowski called attention to this phenomenon of white settler communities not limiting themselves to reproduce metropolis habits but of overdoing them—a point emphasized in more recent work in which Anne Laura Stoler has explored the constant intimate surveillance work that was done to keep colonizers and colonized separated.

The overdoing of metropolitan life was evident not only in the exquisite housekeeping of Manuel dos Santos Pereira’s wife but also in the architecture of a house built according to the principles of the “Portuguese House” style already mentioned above when describing the building of the National Agricultural Experiment Station directed by Sousa da Câmara. According to the technicians of the Office of Colonial Urbanization (Gabinete de Urbanização Colonial), which was responsible for the design of government buildings in Angola and Mozambique, there was in fact an “overseas Portuguese House” style, distinguishable for being even more Portuguese than the “Portuguese House” of the metropole. The Posto Experimental do Caracul was designed as a model settler home aimed at performing, in dos Santos Pereira’s words, “the reproduction of Karakul breeders.”[158]

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции
1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции

В представленной книге крушение Российской империи и ее последнего царя впервые показано не с точки зрения политиков, писателей, революционеров, дипломатов, генералов и других образованных людей, которых в стране было меньшинство, а через призму народного, обывательского восприятия. На основе многочисленных архивных документов, журналистских материалов, хроник судебных процессов, воспоминаний, писем, газетной хроники и других источников в работе приведен анализ революции как явления, выросшего из самого мировосприятия российского общества и выражавшего его истинные побудительные мотивы.Кроме того, авторы книги дают свой ответ на несколько важнейших вопросов. В частности, когда поезд российской истории перешел на революционные рельсы? Правда ли, что в период между войнами Россия богатела и процветала? Почему единение царя с народом в августе 1914 года так быстро сменилось лютой ненавистью народа к монархии? Какую роль в революции сыграла водка? Могла ли страна в 1917 году продолжать войну? Какова была истинная роль большевиков и почему к власти в итоге пришли не депутаты, фактически свергнувшие царя, не военные, не олигархи, а именно революционеры (что в действительности случается очень редко)? Существовала ли реальная альтернатива революции в сознании общества? И когда, собственно, в России началась Гражданская война?

Дмитрий Владимирович Зубов , Дмитрий Михайлович Дегтев , Дмитрий Михайлович Дёгтев

Документальная литература / История / Образование и наука
100 великих казней
100 великих казней

В широком смысле казнь является высшей мерой наказания. Казни могли быть как относительно легкими, когда жертва умирала мгновенно, так и мучительными, рассчитанными на долгие страдания. Во все века казни были самым надежным средством подавления и террора. Правда, известны примеры, когда пришедшие к власти милосердные правители на протяжении долгих лет не казнили преступников.Часто казни превращались в своего рода зрелища, собиравшие толпы зрителей. На этих кровавых спектаклях важна была буквально каждая деталь: происхождение преступника, его былые заслуги, тяжесть вины и т.д.О самых знаменитых казнях в истории человечества рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Елена Н Авадяева , Елена Николаевна Авадяева , Леонид Иванович Зданович , Леонид И Зданович

История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии