Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

The director’s house, stables with pureblood Karakul, the artificial-insemination laboratory, herds of ewes ready to be fertilized, practices for recording breeding, the model natives’ village, and the 16,000 hectares enclosed by barbed wire were all brought together to reproduce white settlers. The characterization of Kriwoj Rog and Giggiga as colonial outposts is confirmed in full by the Karakul experiment station in South West Angola, which was designed to produce, sustain, and expand colonial fascist life. It was through technoscientific Karakul sheep that Portuguese in the desert of South West Angola could be faithful to “the organic essence of the Nation to undertake the historical function of possessing and colonizing overseas dominions and of civilizing indigenous populations.”

However, the literature of postcolonial studies has warned us repeatedly of the actual failure of scientific colonization schemes.[159] Planners’ repeated failures to recognize the complexities of local dynamics and their overestimation of their power to control every social and natural variable resulted in a sad succession of aborted projects. The ambitious project of the Karakul reserve was no exception. In 1962, a report on the “social-economic aspects of the Karakul sheep husbandry industry” by two social scientists from the recently founded Angola Institute of Scientific Research (Instituto de investigação Científica de Angola), although not doubting that Karakul would soon become “one of the major resources of the territory,” bluntly asserted that in the reserve there wasn’t “the slightly existence of anything one may call settlement.”[160] The problem was that instead of new settlers the wealthiest people of the two urban areas of Moçâmedes and Sá da Bandeira acquired the concessions, hired wage laborers, and let the farms be run by foremen. Instead of model settlements there were absentee large landowners. The area occupied by the few farms (no more than seventeen) was to be sure enormous. In contrast to the initially planned 5,000 hectares, each individual unit now consisted of 15,000 hectares, making a total of 271,000 hectares (including the experiment post).

Figure 6.16 A building at the Karakul Experiment Station designed according to “Portuguese house style” as codified by the Portuguese fascist regime, ca. 1960.(Arquivo Instituto Português de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento / MU / DGE / RRN / 1548 / 06127)

The total of seventeen farms raises the question of the historical relevance of Karakul farming to colonial relations in Angola. True enough, the Karakul experiment post didn’t reproduce Karakul farmers, but that doesn’t mean it had no important historical consequences. Independently of the absence of “brave settlers,” Karakul farms were exemplary of a more generalized land grab that occurred all over the south of Angola, aimed at replacing the semi-nomadic societies of the cattle complex with large, white-controlled industrial husbandry operations occupying thousands of hectares. Such replacement demanded a violent military repression and the introduction of industrialized organisms to be sold in international markets. The latter was made possible by the work undertaken at the Karakul Experiment Post.

This replacement was eloquently described in the critical verdict concerning the value of the Karakul experiment by Ruy Cinatti in his unpublished Itinerário Angolano of 1972, a unique mix of phytogeography, agronomy, ethnography, and poetry.[161] Cinatti, a poet who had worked as an agriculture expert for the Portuguese empire, was disheartened by the “radically endogamy of the sheep-human settlement of Karakul.”[162] He despaired at the length of the barbed wire fences that forced the Kuvale to take long detours to have access to water points or else to illegally break the fences:

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции
1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции

В представленной книге крушение Российской империи и ее последнего царя впервые показано не с точки зрения политиков, писателей, революционеров, дипломатов, генералов и других образованных людей, которых в стране было меньшинство, а через призму народного, обывательского восприятия. На основе многочисленных архивных документов, журналистских материалов, хроник судебных процессов, воспоминаний, писем, газетной хроники и других источников в работе приведен анализ революции как явления, выросшего из самого мировосприятия российского общества и выражавшего его истинные побудительные мотивы.Кроме того, авторы книги дают свой ответ на несколько важнейших вопросов. В частности, когда поезд российской истории перешел на революционные рельсы? Правда ли, что в период между войнами Россия богатела и процветала? Почему единение царя с народом в августе 1914 года так быстро сменилось лютой ненавистью народа к монархии? Какую роль в революции сыграла водка? Могла ли страна в 1917 году продолжать войну? Какова была истинная роль большевиков и почему к власти в итоге пришли не депутаты, фактически свергнувшие царя, не военные, не олигархи, а именно революционеры (что в действительности случается очень редко)? Существовала ли реальная альтернатива революции в сознании общества? И когда, собственно, в России началась Гражданская война?

Дмитрий Владимирович Зубов , Дмитрий Михайлович Дегтев , Дмитрий Михайлович Дёгтев

Документальная литература / История / Образование и наука
100 великих казней
100 великих казней

В широком смысле казнь является высшей мерой наказания. Казни могли быть как относительно легкими, когда жертва умирала мгновенно, так и мучительными, рассчитанными на долгие страдания. Во все века казни были самым надежным средством подавления и террора. Правда, известны примеры, когда пришедшие к власти милосердные правители на протяжении долгих лет не казнили преступников.Часто казни превращались в своего рода зрелища, собиравшие толпы зрителей. На этих кровавых спектаклях важна была буквально каждая деталь: происхождение преступника, его былые заслуги, тяжесть вины и т.д.О самых знаменитых казнях в истории человечества рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Елена Н Авадяева , Елена Николаевна Авадяева , Леонид Иванович Зданович , Леонид И Зданович

История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии