Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

Mussolini’s dream was a clear one: “The Italian land giving bread to all Italians!”[1] Freeing Italy from the “slavery of foreign grain” was a crucial issue in the political economy of the fascist regime that came to power in 1922.[2] Fascists envisaged Italy as an autarkic economy, able to release itself from dependency on the “plutocratic states” that dominated the world economy: the British Empire and the United States. The closing of the gap with industrialized nations and the building of a Great Italy was to be achieved by a nationalistic development policy promoting domestic industries producing for internal markets and making intensive use of the country’s own resources.[3] Early on, two big steps were taken in this direction: the Battaglia del Grano (Battle of Wheat) in 1925 and the Battaglia della Lira (Battle of the Lira) in 1926. The latter may be summarized as the stabilization of the lira at the high exchange rate of 90 lira to the pound sterling, making it impossible for Italian exports to compete in world markets. Together with the strong lira came an elaborate new system of tariff protection for national industries, with a proliferation of institutes and committees that allowed the state a degree of control over the economy previously unknown.[4] The Battle of Wheat, on the other hand, was supposed to put an end to the foreign-exchange deficit of the post–World War I years, half of it directly caused by grain imports that made Italy the third-largest wheat importer in the world, behind only the United Kingdom and Germany. The victory would be declared the moment Italian fields would produce 15 quintals per hectare (22 bushels per acre), an increase in productivity by one third in comparison to the post–World War I values and well above the productivity of the US for the years 1923–1927 (14½ bushels per acre). This new mythical number, 15 quintals per hectare, in conjunction with quota 90, allegedly would cover the national deficit in wheat without a need to increase the area dedicated to its cultivation.[5]

No historian of fascist Italy ignores the much-publicized images of Mussolini threshing wheat while stripped to the waist and wearing futuristic goggles, simultaneously playing two of his best-known roles: the First Peasant of Italy and the Flying Duce.[6] In 1926, the first summer of the Battle of Wheat, Illustrazione Italiana published photos of the dictator amid tractors, harvesting wheat, or driving a mechanical sowing machine. The appearance in the mass media of images of the leader among agriculture workers would become an annual ritual of fascist Italy that would culminate in the 1938 documentary film Il Duce inizia la trebbiatura del grana nell’Agro Pontino (The Duce Launches the Threshing in the Pontine Ager). After the narrator reminded the audience of the 200,000 quintals of wheat produced that year in the recently reclaimed Pontine Marshes, the camera tracked Mussolini, who was said to have threshed about 11 quintals in just an hour.[7] In typical fascist manner, this cult of the leader was combined with the organization of mass events, such as demonstrations of wheat threshing in Rome’s central squares and the grandiose national exhibitions of grain held in 1927 and 1932. It is no exaggeration to state that the Battle of Wheat was the first mass propaganda act of Mussolini’s regime, mobilizing film directors, photographers, radio speakers, journalists, and even priests to spread the new gospel.[8]

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции
1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции

В представленной книге крушение Российской империи и ее последнего царя впервые показано не с точки зрения политиков, писателей, революционеров, дипломатов, генералов и других образованных людей, которых в стране было меньшинство, а через призму народного, обывательского восприятия. На основе многочисленных архивных документов, журналистских материалов, хроник судебных процессов, воспоминаний, писем, газетной хроники и других источников в работе приведен анализ революции как явления, выросшего из самого мировосприятия российского общества и выражавшего его истинные побудительные мотивы.Кроме того, авторы книги дают свой ответ на несколько важнейших вопросов. В частности, когда поезд российской истории перешел на революционные рельсы? Правда ли, что в период между войнами Россия богатела и процветала? Почему единение царя с народом в августе 1914 года так быстро сменилось лютой ненавистью народа к монархии? Какую роль в революции сыграла водка? Могла ли страна в 1917 году продолжать войну? Какова была истинная роль большевиков и почему к власти в итоге пришли не депутаты, фактически свергнувшие царя, не военные, не олигархи, а именно революционеры (что в действительности случается очень редко)? Существовала ли реальная альтернатива революции в сознании общества? И когда, собственно, в России началась Гражданская война?

Дмитрий Владимирович Зубов , Дмитрий Михайлович Дегтев , Дмитрий Михайлович Дёгтев

Документальная литература / История / Образование и наука
100 великих казней
100 великих казней

В широком смысле казнь является высшей мерой наказания. Казни могли быть как относительно легкими, когда жертва умирала мгновенно, так и мучительными, рассчитанными на долгие страдания. Во все века казни были самым надежным средством подавления и террора. Правда, известны примеры, когда пришедшие к власти милосердные правители на протяжении долгих лет не казнили преступников.Часто казни превращались в своего рода зрелища, собиравшие толпы зрителей. На этих кровавых спектаклях важна была буквально каждая деталь: происхождение преступника, его былые заслуги, тяжесть вины и т.д.О самых знаменитых казнях в истории человечества рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Елена Н Авадяева , Елена Николаевна Авадяева , Леонид Иванович Зданович , Леонид И Зданович

История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии