Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

(Nazareno Strampelli, “I Miei Lavori: origine e svilluppi—I grani della vittoria,” in Origini, Svillupi, Lavori e Risultati, Istituto Nazionale di Genetica per la Cerealicoltura, 1932)

For all its qualities, the Rieti strain was highly susceptible to lodging (the collapse of stems), a problem that grew with increasing soil fertility and plant height. At a moment when chemical fertilizers were the key to achieving record productivities, many traditionally successful varieties were being discarded due to lodging when cultivated in soils treated with phosphates and nitrates. Strampelli’s first works were typical agricultural studies directed to evaluating the effects on wheat yield of different land rotations or different qualities and quantities of fertilizers, but he soon initiated a breeding program to overcome the lodging behavior of the Rieti variety. His program was based on pedigree selection, a technique (made famous by the Vilmorin seed company) in which all descendants derive from a single individual, in contrast with the traditional practice of mass selection (gathering seeds from the best plants for planting in the next year).[23]

The use of pedigree selection had become a major tool for breeders at the turn of the century. Following the example provided by animal breeders and their studbooks, plant breeders made now use of detailed records identifying the genealogy of each individual plant cultivated in their plots. Through pedigree selection, breeders produced varieties selected for some important feature, such as pest resistance, early ripening, or good milling properties.

In 1903—the year Strampelli began his work in Rieti—the Danish botanist Wilhelm Johannsen published the results of his famous experiments with beans, drawing the distinction between genotype and phenotype. Whereas the Vilmorins and other breeders defined the stability of their lines of wheat by referring to repeated rounds of selection, Johannsen defined his “pure lines” of beans in Mendelian terms, as products of self-fertilization of homozygotic organisms.[24] Besides the theoretical breakthrough represented by Johannsen’s experiments, he seemed to have demonstrated the uselessness of making selections from pure lines constituted of genetically homogenous individuals.[25] These pure lines would become central in promises of standardizing agricultural practices, for their homozygosity guaranteed they would always react the same way in the same given environment.[26] They promised the end of the variable and unreliable world of traditional landraces, the local varieties used and produced by farmers, replacing it with a set of standardized genetic products with predictable fixed behavior. More than that, while landraces acquired properties (e.g., the Rieti strain’s resistance to rust) through Darwinian natural selection, the pure lines were produced by artificial selection—by breeders engineering nature.

Using pedigree selection, Strampelli followed two parallel strategies. He began planting several highly productive imported varieties of wheat in a rented experimental plot in the most humid area of the valley, hoping to select those able to resist its highly adverse conditions. At the same time, he made selections of the traditional Rieti variety with the aid of 28 local farmers aiming to identify a line that presented enhanced resistance to lodging. Both strategies failed: all the high-yield foreign wheats suffered severe attacks of rust, and no selection of the Rieti landrace had much resistance to lodging.[27]

Since selection was not enough, Strampelli complemented it with hybridization in order to combine characters from different varieties. Like the Vilmorins, Strampelli began his hybridization work before he had heard of the rediscovery of Mendel’s experiments by de Vries, Correns, and Tschermack.[28] Nevertheless, as early as 1905 he became acquainted with Mendel’s laws, which offered him a quantification of his own observations of disjunctions in the second generation. After that he would consider himself a devoted follower of the mythic founding father of genetics, and would even named one of his wheat strains Gregor Mendel.[29] He hybridized pure lines in order to combine Mendelian characters, after which he would make a selection of the offspring until he obtained again fixed pure lines. Strampelli definitely did not share Johannsen’s disgust for hybridization, and used both the typological approach of the pure line research programs, aimed at fixing the type, and the combinatory strategy of hybridizers.[30]

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции
1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции

В представленной книге крушение Российской империи и ее последнего царя впервые показано не с точки зрения политиков, писателей, революционеров, дипломатов, генералов и других образованных людей, которых в стране было меньшинство, а через призму народного, обывательского восприятия. На основе многочисленных архивных документов, журналистских материалов, хроник судебных процессов, воспоминаний, писем, газетной хроники и других источников в работе приведен анализ революции как явления, выросшего из самого мировосприятия российского общества и выражавшего его истинные побудительные мотивы.Кроме того, авторы книги дают свой ответ на несколько важнейших вопросов. В частности, когда поезд российской истории перешел на революционные рельсы? Правда ли, что в период между войнами Россия богатела и процветала? Почему единение царя с народом в августе 1914 года так быстро сменилось лютой ненавистью народа к монархии? Какую роль в революции сыграла водка? Могла ли страна в 1917 году продолжать войну? Какова была истинная роль большевиков и почему к власти в итоге пришли не депутаты, фактически свергнувшие царя, не военные, не олигархи, а именно революционеры (что в действительности случается очень редко)? Существовала ли реальная альтернатива революции в сознании общества? И когда, собственно, в России началась Гражданская война?

Дмитрий Владимирович Зубов , Дмитрий Михайлович Дегтев , Дмитрий Михайлович Дёгтев

Документальная литература / История / Образование и наука
100 великих казней
100 великих казней

В широком смысле казнь является высшей мерой наказания. Казни могли быть как относительно легкими, когда жертва умирала мгновенно, так и мучительными, рассчитанными на долгие страдания. Во все века казни были самым надежным средством подавления и террора. Правда, известны примеры, когда пришедшие к власти милосердные правители на протяжении долгих лет не казнили преступников.Часто казни превращались в своего рода зрелища, собиравшие толпы зрителей. На этих кровавых спектаклях важна была буквально каждая деталь: происхождение преступника, его былые заслуги, тяжесть вины и т.д.О самых знаменитых казнях в истории человечества рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Елена Н Авадяева , Елена Николаевна Авадяева , Леонид Иванович Зданович , Леонид И Зданович

История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии