schizoid nineteenth-century creativity, with Marx’s works at
the fore, from affecting people and depriving them of their
common sense.
If only for purposes of the above-mentioned psychological
experiment, it is good practice for developing awareness of this
pathological factor by searching the works of K. Marx for sev-
eral statements with these characteristic deficits. When such a
study is conducted by several people with varied world views,
the experiment will show how a clear picture of reality can be
restored, and it becomes easier to find a common language.
Schizoidia has thus played an essential role as one of the
factors in the genesis of the evil threatening our contemporary
world. Practicing psychotherapy upon the world will therefore
demand that the results of such evil be eliminated as skillfully
as possible.
The first researchers – the author and his colleagues - at-
tracted by the idea of objectively understanding this phenome-
non initially failed to perceive the role of
attempted to reconstruct the early phase of said genesis, we had
to acknowledge that characteropaths played a significant role in
this process.
We already know from the preceding chapter how their de-
fective experiential and thought patterns take hold in human
minds, insidiously destroying their way of reasoning and their
ability to utilize their healthy common sense. This role has also
proved essential because their activities as
pathic individuals and the view of the world they want to im-
pose.
In the ponerogenic process of the pathocratic phenomenon,
characteropathic individuals adopt ideologies created by doc-
trinaire, often schizoidal people, recast them into an active
POLITICAL PONEROLOGY
189
propaganda form, and disseminate it with their characteristic
pathological egotism and paranoid intolerance for any philoso-
phies which may differ from their own. They also inspire fur-
ther transformation of this ideology into its
lated in numerically limited groups is now activated at societal
level, thanks to their spellbinding abilities.
It also appears that this process tends to intensify with time;
initial activities are undertaken by persons with milder charac-
teropathic features, who are easily able to hide their aberrations
from others. Paranoid individuals then become principally ac-
tive. Toward the end of the process, an individual with
can easily take over leadership.
As long as the characteropathic individuals play a dominant
role within a social movement affected by the ponerogenic
process, the ideology, whether doctrinaire from the outset or
later vulgarized and further perverted by these latter people,
continues to keep and maintain its content link with the original
prototype. The ideology continuously affects the movement’s
activities and remains an essential justifying motivation for
many. In this phase, therefore, such a union does not move in
the direction of criminal acts on a mass scale. To a certain ex-
tent, at this stage, one can still define such a movement or un-
ion by the name of its original ideology.
In the meantime, however, the carriers of other (mainly he-
reditary) pathological factors become engaged in this already
sick social movement and proceed with the work of final trans-
formation of the contents – both ideological and human - of
such a union in such a way that it becomes a pathological cari-
cature of its original ideology. This is effected under the ever-
growing influence of
types, with particular emphasis on the inspiration role of essen-
tial psychopathy.
Such a situation eventually engenders a wholesale show-
down: the adherents of the original ideology are shunted aside
or terminated. (This group includes many characteropaths,
especially of the lesser and paranoidal varieties.) The ideologi-
cal motivations and the double talk they created then are util-
190
PATHOCRACY
ized to hide the actual new contents of the phenomenon. From
this time on, using the ideological name of the movement in
order to understand its essence becomes a keystone of mis-
takes.
Psychopathic individuals generally stay away from social
organizations characterized by reason and ethical discipline.
After all, such organizations are created by that other world of
normal people so foreign to them. They hold various social
ideologies in contempt, while, at the same time, easily discern-
ing all their actual failings. However, once the process of pon-