Читаем Позитивные изменения. Образование. Школа будущего (Тематический выпуск, 2022)/Positive changes. Education. The school of the future (Special issue, 2022) полностью

A very small group. This is what needs to be investigated. It seems to me that everyone wants something more, but in fact everyone only cares about passing the USE. The child has to enter a University (especially a boy).

What do parents of preschoolers say most often, what is their request?

More often than not, they say: "We want to make sure that the child’s motivation to study is not destroyed." Or even better: they want the child to be motivated to study, to be eager, ready and excited to learn new things and develop. But at the same time, he or she needs to be able to enter a good, solid school. It is also about the USE, so the child does not lose his or her academic skills. I keep explaining and telling them: "You see, getting into a good school in the form that exists in our reality is just a sports competition. That is why you have to prepare for it." Everything here is like sports competitions. The child may not have outstanding cognitive abilities, and it is hard for parents to accept that. Perhaps the child simply does not need to go to such a school, instead he or she would learn happily at the right level.

We recently spoke with a mother who returned from Ireland, she wanted to find a primary school here for her children, grades 1–2. She said: "Look, when we came to Ireland, we were told to just go to school. They just sign you up and you start going there. It is okay, they will learn the language, they will study." This is it. And the kids are somehow studying. She said: "Here we came to a school with an English focus, an old private school, and they told us: your Russian is not very good, you should work with tutors at home for now, improve your language skills, then come to us in three months for testing." The point here is that our school believes it does not exist for the person, but the person exists for the school. So as soon as a child has some peculiarities, the school gets nervous.

So we can say that the School of the Future is an inclusive school?

In principle, yes, an inclusive school. If the school has its own resource department – that would be great. The resource department is a staff of neuropsychologists and speech therapists. For example, a child with ASD comes to school, he or she can study individually. They make up a schedule for him/her, for example, his/her first two lessons are individual. Then he/she joins the class for more lessons. That is, the resource department is just a kind of team of specialists, several rooms in a separate block where children can work individually or in a mini group of two or three people.

The point here is that our school believes it does not exist for the person, but the person exists for the school. So as soon as a child has some peculiarities, the school gets nervous.

Comparing different educational models, what criteria can you use to judge them? The content of education, that is, the blocks from which it is built. Knowledge, abilities, skills, subject content. Probably a description of the staff, that is, who works at the school, how they get there. What kind of corporate culture it has? Democratic, or authoritarian? Are the communication styles between students and teachers more of a coaching position or a talking head? The coaching position, of course, is preferable here, when all the teachers somehow still support the children, motivate them.

Probably styles of interaction with parents, feedback, communication. There are schools where none of this is practiced at all.

The grading system – what kind of grading is there? Variability is also one of the aspects. That is, how flexible the school can be, how much it can adapt to the child.

What educational model is the School of the Future closer to – Finnish, Asian, International Baccalaureate?

I think it is closer to some Scandinavian model, particularly Finnish one. That is solely based on what I know about it from down here; I have not been inside a school like that. That is, it is the model of the European school that says: "Here is an environment full of opportunities, but there are multiple ways to grab these opportunities within the same school. If you are gifted, okay, we will build you a track. If you have any difficulties, that’s all right.” To me, this is probably such a humane European school.

<p>Школы в России и за рубежом: чему и зачем в них учиться?</p>
Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Формула. Стратегия воспитания успешных людей, основанная на исследовании выпускников Гарварда и других ведущих университетов
Формула. Стратегия воспитания успешных людей, основанная на исследовании выпускников Гарварда и других ведущих университетов

Как нужно воспитывать ребенка, чтобы он вырос умным, целеустремленным и успешным? Профессор Гарвардского университета Рональд Ф. Фергюсон и журналист Татша Робертсон провели масштабное исследование: в течение 15 лет они задавали этот вопрос выдающимся бизнесменам, политикам, музыкантам, спортсменам и их родителям.Оказалось, что социальный статус, благосостояние семьи или город, где рос ребенок, значения не имеют. Главное – придерживаться определенной стратегии в воспитании.Хороший родитель умеет переключаться внутри своей главной роли на восемь составляющих. Именно в этом и кроется секрет воспитания целеустремленных и реализованных людей – в умении родителей совмещать в себе восемь ролей. Из этой книги вы узнаете, какие это роли; надо ли учить ребенка считать, читать и писать до школы; стоит ли вмешиваться в конфликты ребенка с друзьями и учителями; как мотивировать его к учебе. В книге собраны последние научные исследования в области развития и обучения детей и истории успеха выдающихся людей.В формате a4.pdf сохранен издательский макет.

Рональд Фергюсон , Татша Робертсон

Педагогика, воспитание детей, литература для родителей / Воспитание детей / Дом и досуг