24. Ibn al-Arabi: d. 1240 in Damascus.
25. Ibn al-Farid: d. 1235.
26. Jalal al-Din Rumi: d. 1273.
27. Al-Ghazali: 1058–1111.
28. Al-Hallaj: 857–922.
29. Cf. Noël J. Coulson, A History of Islamic Law
(Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1964).30. Al-Kindi: 800–873.
31. Albert the Great: 1200–1280.
32. Origen: 185–253.
33. Gregory of Nyssa: 335–394.
34. De Certeau, The Mystic Fable
: “Since the thirteenth century (courtly love, etc.), a gradual religious demythification seems to be accompanied by a progressive mythification of love. The One has changed its site. It is no longer God but the other, and in a masculine literature, woman” (4); “for reasons that need clarifying, the woman’s experience held up better against the cluttered ruins of symbolic systems, which were theological and masculine, and which thought of presence as the coming of a Logos” (6).35. Thomas Aquinas: 1225–1274.
36. Jan van Ruysbroek: 1293–1381.
37. Hadewijch of Antwerp: ca. 1200–1260.
38. Ps. 42:7: “Deep calleth unto deep.”
39. Homo quidam nobilis
: “A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom, and to return” (Luke 19:12), commented on by Meister Eckhart, Von dem edeln Menschen. See The Complete Mystical Works of Meister Eckhart, trans. and ed. Maurice O’C. Walshe (New York: Crossroad, 2009), 544; for the short quotations, 422–4, 543–4.40. Angelus Silesius: 1624–1677.
41. Henry Suso: ca. 1296–1365.
42. Johannes Tauler: ca. 1300–1361.
43. Nicholas Krebs of Cusa: 1401–1464.
44. Jakob Böhme: 1575–1624.
45. G. W. F. Hegel: 1770–1831.
46. Angelus Silesius, Selections from
The Cherubinic Wanderer, trans. J. E. Crawford Flitch (Westport, Conn.: Hyperion, 1978), 148: “The Mystical Abandonment. Abandonment ensnareth God: / But the Abandonment supreme, / Which few there can comprehend, / Is to abandon even Him.”47. Hildegarde of Bingen: 1098–1179.
48. Angela of Foligno: 1248–1309.
49. Catherine of Siena: 1347–1380.
50. Francis of Assisi: 1182–1226.
51. Martin Luther: 1483–1546.
52. Henri de Lubac, Corpus Mysticum: The Eucharist and the Church in the Middle Ages
, trans. Gemma Simmonds et al. (London: SCM, 2006), 256: “Of the three terms: historical body, sacramental body and ecclesial body that it was a case of putting into order amongst each other, the caesura was originally placed between the first and second, whereas it subsequently came to be placed between the second and the third.”53. Cf. de Certeau, The Mystic Fable
: “After the middle of the twelfth century, the expression [corpus mysticum] no longer designated the Eucharist, as it had previously, but the Church. Conversely, ‘corpus verum’ no longer designated the Church but the Eucharist.…The Church, the social ‘body’ of Christ, is henceforth the (hidden) signified of a sacramental ‘body’ held to be a visible signifier…the showing of a presence beneath the ‘species’ (or appearances) of the consecrated bread and wine.…The sacrament (‘sumere Christum’) and the Church (‘sumi a Christo’) were joined…in the mode of the Church-Eucharist pair…of a visible community…and a secret action (ergon) or ‘mystery’…” (82–3). “The mystical term is therefore a mediating one between the historical ‘body’ that becomes ‘similar to a Code that is the law’ and the ‘mystery,’ the sacramental body…recast in the philosophical formality…as one ‘thing’ which is visible, designating another, which is invisible. The visibility of that object replaces the communal celebration, which is a community operation.…The mystical third is no more than the object of an intention. It is something that needs to be made manifest…constructed, on the basis of two clear, authoritative ‘documents’: the scriptural corpus and the Eucharistic ostension.” “A mystical Church body would have to be ‘invented,’ in the same sense in which there was to be an invention of the New World. That endeavor was the Reformation. It was gradually divided into two tendencies: one (Protestant) giving a privileged status to the scriptural corpus, the other (Catholic) to the sacrament” (84). “Furthermore, despite the ups and downs of the papal states, from the Lateran Council until the reformism following the Council of Trent (1545–1563), that pastoral (centered on the only body that could symbolize and sustain the restoration/institution of a visible Church) would have great stability.…One trait is of special interest in the question of the apparition of mystical science: the progressive concentration of these debates around seeing” (87–9).54. Lateran Council III: 1179.
55. Lateran Council IV: 1215.
56. Council of Trent: 1545–1563.
57. Antonio Vivaldi: 1678–1741.
58. Jacopo Robusti, Il Tintoretto: 1519–1594.