I couldn’t see why. Truth
To my astonishment he chose that moment to get to his feet and bring the discussion to a close.
‘Unfortunately, Minister, I have no time. I must be going.’
I gasped. ‘You can’t. This is top priority. I order you.’
‘Alas! Minister, it is your orders that are calling me away.’
I couldn’t think what he meant. He explained: ‘Your scheme for imposing pre-set failure standards on local councils is very complex. You asked for proposals straight away. It is taking every moment of my time. Much as I would like to help . . .’
He paused. Then he seemed to make a proposal. ‘On the other hand, if implementing failure standards were not quite so urgent . . .’
‘Do you mean,’ I asked casually, ‘you
He was guarded. ‘Minister, we cannot censor the BBC. But . . . I happen to be having lunch tomorrow with the BBC’s Director of Policy, perhaps you’d care to join us?’
I couldn’t see any point, if we can’t censor them. I said so, rather disconsolately.
But Sir Humphrey’s reply has given me grounds for hope. ‘No Minister, but we can always try to persuade them to withdraw programmes voluntarily once they realise that transmission is not in the public interest.’
‘It’s not in my interest,’ I replied firmly, ‘and I represent the public. So it can’t be in the public interest.’
Humphrey looked intrigued. ‘That’s a novel approach,’ he said. ‘We’ve not tried that on them before.’
I think that he has more respect for my ideas than he likes to show.
A very successful lunch today with Humphrey and Francis Aubrey, the BBC’s Director of Policy, a man with a permanently anxious expression on his face. As well he might have.
It started badly though. As soon as I broached the subject he stated his position firmly. ‘I’m sorry, Mr Hacker, but the BBC cannot give in to government pressure.’ His black bushy eyebrows bristled sternly.
‘Well, let’s leave that on one side, shall we?’ said Sir Humphrey smoothly.
I thought Humphrey was supposed to be on my side.
‘No really,’ I began, ‘I must insist . . .’
But he silenced me, rather rudely I thought. ‘Let’s leave that on one side,’ he repeated. ‘
I had no option really. But I later realised that I had underestimated my Permanent Secretary.
He turned to Mr Aubrey and said: ‘Frank, can I raise something else? There is considerable disquiet about the BBC’s hostility to the Government.’
Aubrey laughed off the idea. ‘That’s absurd.’
‘Well,
I’d been preoccupied and worried, and I’d scarcely noticed it. If I had thought about it I suppose I’d have assumed it contained some documents with such a high security clearance that Humphrey had to take them with him everywhere he went.
In the event, it turned out that it contained a number of files that he intended to show the man from the Beeb.
‘We have been documenting instances of bias in BBC current affairs.’ He handed over a file with
Francis Aubrey was clearly shaken by this mass of incriminating allegations and evidence. ‘But . . . I’m . . . but I’m sure we’ve got answers to all these.’ He sounded more firm than he looked.
‘Of course the BBC’s got answers,’ I told him. ‘It’s always got answers. Silly ones, but it’s always got them.’
Humphrey was taking a cooler line. ‘Of course the BBC has explanations,’ he said soothingly. ‘But I just thought I ought towarn you that questions are being asked.’
‘What sort of questions?’ Mr Aubrey was looking even more worried.