[39] "In Russia Eastern despotism served as a model," asserted Chicherin categorically in his fundamental work О
narodnom predstavitel'stve, p. 531.[40] Cited in G. Vernadsky, The Mongols in Russia,
p. 389.[41] N.
A. Berdiaev, Istoki i smysl russhogo kommunizma, p. 7.[42] K. Wittfogel, Oriental Despotism,
p. 225.[43] L. V Cherepnin, "K voprosu о skladyvanii absoliutnoi monarkhii v Rossii," p. 38.
[44] Ibid., pp. 24-25.
[45] Istoriia SSSR,
p. 212.1 am neither an orthodox nor a rebellious Marxist—I simply don't have anything in common with this mode of thought. But even a bitter opponent of Marxism would scarcely parody it as brutally as do these writers who claim to have custody of the pure Marxist flame.[46] A. Ia. Avrekh, "Russkii absoliutizm i ego rol' v utverzhdenii kapitalizma v Rossii," pp. 83, 85. Emphasis added.
[47] V. I. Lenin, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii,
vol. 9, pp. 333-34.[48] Avrekh, p. 89. Emphasis added.
[49] It should be noted that, in direct form, the category of political progress is lacking in Soviet historiography (and before Avrekh it was lacking even in indirect form). Therefore the criterion of political
development is also lacking. And there is no knowing what is good or bad here, what is positive and what is negative, or what is moving from what direction and toward what. I emphasize that what is being spoken of is not the trivial Marxist postulate that the replacement of one socioeconomic order by another is inevitable, but political progress—that is, the fact that different political structures possess different dynamic potentials. And, for this reason, Avrekh's attempt to declare "St. Petersburg absolutism" (even if it never existed) capable (unlike "Muscovite despotism") of political dynamism, was for its kind a remarkably partisan action in Soviet historiography, as well as a risky one.[50] Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, Izbrannye pis'ma,
p. 79.[51] A. L. Shapiro, "Ob absoliutizme v Rossii," p. 71.
[52] A. I. Davidovich and S. A. Pokrovskii, "O klassovoi sushchnosti i etapakh razvi- tiia russkogo absoliutizma," p. 65.
[53] Ibid., p. 62. 34. Ibid., p. 65.
[54] Ibid., p. 142.
[55] V. I. Lenin, Polnoe sobranie sochinenii,
vol. 9, p. 381.[56] A. N. Sakharov, p. 148. 45. Ibid., p. 111. 46. Ibid., p. 112.
[57] S. N. Eisenstadt, "The Study of Oriental Despotisms as Systems of Total Power," p. 446.
[58] Donald W. Treadgold, ed.,
The Development of the USSR: An Exchange of Views, pp. 352-53.[59] Ibid., p. 331.