working in opposite directions—from the point of view of Ravelin's criterion. They were united by another criterion of progress—also one of Ravelin's: the expansion of the might of the Russian state. The problem, however, lies in the fact that these two criteria contradict each other, which Kavelin does not even notice.
15. Kavelin, pt. 1, p. 310. 16. Ibid., p. 357. 17. Ibid., p. 361.
[171] Ibid., p. 362. 19. Ibid., p. 361. 20. Ibid., pp. 361-62.
[172] Ibid., pt. 2, p. 597.
[174] K. Kavelin, pt. 2, pp. 597, 596.
[175] Ibid., p. 610.
[176] Ibid., pp. 656, 645-46, 678.
[179] I. I. Smirnov,
[180] S. B. Veselovskii, p. 23.
[181] K. S. Aksakov,
[182] V. Rubin,
[183] Ravelin, pt. 1, p. 355.
[184] Kavelin, pt. 1, p. 410.
[185] Ibid., p. 412.
[187] S. Gorskii, p. 373.
[188] Quoted from A. Yanov, "Al'ternativa," p. 72. This article, in which the struggle of the emigr6 Herzen was represented as the only worthy alternative to the pseudopa- triotism of the "slavish majority," was one of the causes of my own expulsion from Russia, and the issue of
[189] Ibid., p. 74.
[191] Cited in ibid., pp. 469, 471.