Ум в движении. Как действие формирует мысль

В языке аймара прошлое впереди

Núñez, R., & Cooperrider, K. (2013). The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(5), 220–229.

Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30(3), 401–450.

В китайском литературном языке (и календарях) прошлое может быть внизу

Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22.

Fuhrman, O., McCormick, K., Chen, E., Jiang, H., Shu, D., Mao, S., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science, 35(7), 1305–1328.

Направление времени – это направление письма

Tversky, B., Kugelmass, S., & Winter, A. (1991). Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions. Cognitive Psychology, 23(4), 515–557.

Обозначение времени жестом слева направо

Santiago, J., Lupáñez, J., Pérez, E., & Funes, M. J. (2007). Time (also) flies from left to right. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(3), 512–516.

Перспектива в письменных и устных языках

Emmorey, K., Tversky, B., & Taylor, H. A. (2000). Using space to describe space: Perspective in speech, sign, and gesture. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 2(3), 157–180.

Символическая дистанция

Banks, W. P., & Flora, J. (1977). Semantic and perceptual processes in symbolic comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 278–290.

Holyoak, K. J., & Mah, W. A. (1981). Semantic congruity in symbolic comparisons: Evidence against an expectancy hypothesis. Memory and Cognition, 9, 197–204.

Moyer, R. S. (1973). Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics. Perception and Psychophysics, 1, 180–184.

Paivio, A. (1978). Mental comparisons involving abstract attributes. Memory and Cognition, 6, 199–208.

Символическая дистанция у других биологических видов

D’Amato, M. R., & Colombo, M. (1990). The symbolic distance effect in monkeys (Cebus paella). Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 133–140.

Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (2004). Language and the origin of numerical concepts. Science, 306(5695), 441–443.

Транзитивный логический вывод у других биологических видов

Bond, A. B, Kamil, A. C, & Balda, R. P. (2003). Social complexity and transitive inference in corvids. Animal Behavior, 65, 479–487.

Byrne, R. W., & Bates, L. A. (2007). Sociality, evolution and cognition. Current Biology, 17, 714–723.

Byrne, R. W. & Whiten, A. (1988). Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

Davis, H. (1992). Transitive inference in rats (Rattus norvegicus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 106, 342–349.

Grosenick, L., Clement, T. S., & Fernald, R. D. (2007). Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature, 445, 429–432.

MacLean, E. L., Merritt, D. J., & Brannon, E. M. (2008). Social complexity predicts transitive reasoning in Prosimian primates. Animal Behavior, 76, 479–486.

Von Fersen, L., Wynee, C. D. L., Delius, J. D., & Staddon, J. E. R. (1991). Transitive inference formation in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 334–341.

Система приблизительных количеств у детей и представителей других биологических видов

Brannon, E. M., & Terrace, H. S. (1998). Ordering of the numerosities 1 to 9 by monkeys. Science, 282(5389), 746–749.

Brannon, E. M., Wusthoff, C. J., Gallistel, C. R., & Gibbon, J. (2001). Numerical subtraction in the pigeon: Evidence for a linear subjective number scale. Psychological Science, 12(3), 238–243.

Cantlon, J. F., Platt, M. L., & Brannon, E. M. (2009). Beyond the number domain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 83–91.