Wiki-правительство: Как технологии могут сделать власть лучше, демократию – сильнее, а граждан – влиятельнее

30. Edward Day Collins, “Committees of Correspondence of the American Revolution,” Annual Report of the American Historical Association (1901): 245–271.

31. Harvey Anderson, “Intellectual Property and Free Expression,” лекция, Stanford University, May 27, 2008 (примечания в тексте сделаны автором).

32. Mitchell Baker, Mozilla Foundation chairman of the board, “Summer 2008 Goals,” May 14, 2008 (blog.lizardwrangler.com/2008/05/14 [October 2008]).

33. “Energy Bill Bans Incandescent Lightbulbs.” Более полную информацию о ртутьсодержащих лампах см. на сайте EPA

46. Diana C. Mutz, Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2006).

47. Cass Sunstein, Why Societies Need Dissent (Harvard University Press, 2003), p. 118.

48. Ann Macintosh and Stephen Coleman, “Promise and Problems of EDemocracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement” (Paris: OECD, 2003).

49. Peter M. Shane, ed., Democracy Online: The Prospects for Political Renewal through the Internet (New York: Routledge, 2004).

50. Karen Czapanskiy and Rashida Manjoo, “The Right of Public Participation in the Law-Making Process and the Role of the Legislature in the Promotion of This Right,” University of Maryland School of Law Legal Studies 42 (2008): 31.

51. Alexander Meiklejohn, Political Freedom: The Constitutional Powers of the People (New York: Harper, 1960).

52. Edward Wyatt with Charles V. Bagli, “Visions of Ground Zero: The Public; Officials Rethink Building Proposal for Ground Zero,” New York Times, July 21, 2002, p. A1.

53. См., например: Howard Zinn, A Power Governments Cannot Suppress (San Francisco: City Lights, 2007).

54. Michael Sorkin, Starting from Zero: Reconstructing Downtown New York (New York: Routledge, 2003), pp. 57–61.

55. Michael Schudson, The Good Citizen: A History of American Civil Life (New York: Free Press, 1998).

56. Есть ряд предложений в теории гражданского общества: Benjamin R. Barber, Strong Democracy (Princeton University Press, 1984); Richard E. Sclove, Democracy and Technology (New York: Guilford, 1996); Theda Skocpol and Morris P. Fiorina, eds., Civic Engagement in American Democracy (Brookings, 1999).

57. Jack M. Balkin, “Digital Speech and Democratic Culture: A Theory of Freedom of Expression for the Information Society,” New York University Law Review 79 (2004): 1–58.

58. Идеальный тип группы включает «представителей всех слоев нашего общества; только в этом случае при надлежащем финансировании она будет действовать беспристрастно, мудро, организованно и четко». Donald Guimary, Citizens Groups and Broadcasting (New York: Praeger, 1975), p. 148.

59. Andy Oram, “In Search of Microelites: How to Get User-Generated Content,” November 14, 2007 (radar.oreilly.com/2007/11/in-search-ofmicroelites-how-t.html [October 2008]).

60. Joseph Nye, “Picking a President,” Democracy Journal (Fall 2008): 19–28.

61. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, 464 U. S. 417 (1984).

62. Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008 (ProIP Act) S. 3325. Nate Anderson, “Big Content Gloats as Bush Signs Pro-IP Act,” ArsTechnica, October 14, 2008 [December 2008]); John Borland, “RIAA Settles with 12-Year-Old Girl,” September 9, 2003 [October 2008]); Eric Bangeman, “RIAA versus Grandma, Part II: The Showdown That Wasn’t,” December 16, 2007 (arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20071216.html [October 2008]). См. также: MGM Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., 545 U. S. 913 (2005) (peer-to-peer filesharing case) (arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081014.html [October 2008]).

Глава 3

1. U. S. Patent and Trademark Office, “Patent Organization” (www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/index.html [October 2008]).

2. В TC-2100 скопилось 87 301 заявка, ожидающая начала экспертизы, а всего в Бюро патентов 151 698 патентных заявок. В 2008 г. TC 2100 слилось с другим подразделением и стало называться TC 2400. Джек Харви остался руководителем.

3. Patent Act of 1952, as amended. 35 U. S. C. 101 et seq.

4. “Confidential status of applications; publication of patent applications,” 35 U. S. C. 122 (November 29, 2000).

5. “Infringement of patent,” 35 U. S. C. 271 (December 8, 2003); “Damages,” 35 U. S. C. 284 (November 29, 2000); “Injunctions,” 35 U. S. C. 283 (July 19, 1952), “Attorney fees,” 35 U. S. C. 285 (July 19, 1952); “Contents and term of patent; provisional rights,” 35 U. S. C. 154 (November 2, 2002); eBay Inc v. MercExchange, L. L. C., 547 U. S. C. 388 (2006) (запрет обсуждать ограничения и требования в патентах).

6. Другое исследование касается открытых приложений и документов, в частности доклада МВФ. См.: Richard Harper, Inside the IMF: An Ethnography of Documents, Technology, and Organizational Action (Academic Press, 2007); Geoffrey Bowker and Susan Leigh Star, Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences (MIT Press, 2008); Annelise Riles, ed., Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge (University of Michigan Press, 2006).