Edwards J.
A Brief Vindication of the Fundamental Articles of the Christian Faith, As also Of the Clergy, Universities and Publick Schools, from Mr. Lock’s Reflections upon Them in his Book of Education, &c. With some Animadversions on two other late Pamphlets, viz. Of Mr. Bold and a Nameless Socinian Writer. – London, 1697.506
Sherlock W
A Vindication of Dr. Sherlock’s Sermon Concerning The Danger of Corrupting the Faith by Philosophy. In Answer to Some Socinian Remarks. – London, 1697.507
Payne W.
The Mystery of the Christian Faith and of the Blessed Trinity Vindicated, and the Divinity of Christ Proved. In Three Sermons… In the Press before his Death, and by himself ordered to be published. – London, 1697.508
[Lobb S.]
The Growth of Error. – London, 1697.509
[West
i?.] Animadversions on a Late Book, Entituled The Reasonableness of Christianity, As Deliveres in the Scriptures. – Oxford, 1697.510
Edwards J.
A Preservative Against Socinianism. Shewing the Direct and Plain Op position Between It, and the Religion Revealed by God in the Holy Scriptures… the Third Part. – Oxford, 1697.511
Becconsall Th.
The Grounds and Foundation of Natural Religion Discover’d, In the Principal Branches of it, in Opposition to the Prevailing Notions of the Modern Scepticks and Latitudinarians. With an Introduction concerning the Necessity of Revealed Religion. – London, 1698.512
F. B.
A Free but Modest Censure on the Late Controversial Writings and Debates of the Lord Bishop of Worcester and Mr. Locke; Mr. Edwards and Mr. Locke; The Honble Charles Boyle, Esq.; and Dr. Bentley. Together with Brief Remarks on Monsieur Le Clerc’s Ars Critica. – London, 1698.513
[Milner
J.] An Account of Mr. Lock’s Religion, Out of His own Writings, and in His own Words. Together with Some Observations upon It, and a Twofold Appendix. I. A Specimen of Mr. Lock’s Way of Answering Authors… II. A Brief Enquiry Whether Socinianism Be Justly Charged upon Mr. Lock. – London, 1700.514
Whitby D.
A Paraphrase and Commentary upon all the Epistles of the New Testament. London, 1700.515
Хотя слово «разумность» в отношении христианства применялось и ранее, например Генри Хаммондом: Hammond, H.Of the Reasonableness of Christian Religion. – London, 1650.
516
[R oland J.]
Christianity not Mysterious, Or A Treatise Shewing, That there is nothing in the Gospel Contrary to Reason, Nor Above it, And that no Christian Doctrine can be properly call’d a Mystery. – London, 1696.517
[Willis R
.] Occasional Paper, no 1. Containing an Account of the Author’s Design, Together with Some Reflections on a Book Enituled, A Letter to the Deists; in a Letter to a Friend; no 5. Containing a Defense of the Ministry and Ministers of the Gospel; against the Suggestion of Some Late Writers. In a letter to a Friend, with a Post-Script Relating to the Author of the Reasonableness of Christianity. – London, 1697.518
\Willis R.~\
The Occasional Paper, no 5. P. 41. Цит. no: Numao J.K. Willis, Rich ard // The Continuum Companion to Locke / Ed. by S.J. Savonius-Wroth-Wroth, P. Schuurman and J.Walmsley. – London – N.Y.: Continuum International Publishing Group, 2010. P. 118.519
В декабре 1696 г. в Эдинбурге за разного рода богохульства, в частности за отрицание Троицы, был казнен через повешение восемнадцатилетний студент Томас Айкенхед (он был похоронен только через две недели под виселицей), что, впрочем, стало последним случаем применения высшей меры за бохогульство на территории трех королевств.
520
Гоббс Т.
Сочинения в 2 т. – М.: Мысль, 1991. Т. 2. С. 358–359; Локк Дж. Сочинения в 3 т. – М. Мысль, 1988. Т. 3. С. 96–97.521
Locke on Toleration / Ed. by R.Vernon. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. P. 29; Locke J. A Letter concerning Toleration and other Writings /Ed. by M.Goldie. – Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2010. P. 42. Перевод этой фразы в приведенном выше русском издании «Но Евангелие не является таким законом ни для одного христианского государства» (с. 117) запутывает суть дела. Латинская фраза читается: «Sed sub Evangelio nulla prorsus est res publica Christiana». Английская: «But there is absolutely no such thing under the Gospel as a Christian Commonwealth». См. параллельные латинский и английский тексты: Montuori М.
John Locke on Toleration and the Unity of God. – Amsterdam: J. C. Gieben Publishers, 1983. P. 72–73. Как можно заметить, говоря о государстве, Локк пользуется термином «республика», что хорошо видно в латинском тексте, а в английском несколько смазано более неопределенным «commonwealth». Но это отдельная тема. См. также: Locke J. Two Treatises of Government /Ed. by P.Laslett. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. P.355.522