"You were quite right," said Franklin Clarke dryly (вы были совершенно правы, — сказал Франклин Кларк сухо).
constitute ['kOnstItju:t], reasonable ['ri:z@n@bl], disturb [dIs't@:b]
"What was necessary in this case was to imagine a mind so constituted that it was logical and reasonable to commit four or more murders and to announce them beforehand by letters written to Hercule Poirot."
"My friend, Hastings, will tell you that from the moment I received the first letter I was upset and disturbed. It seemed to me at once that there was something very wrong about the letter."
"You were quite right," said Franklin Clarke dryly.
"Yes. But there (но там), at the very start (с самого начала), I made a grave error (я совершил серьезную ошибку). I permitted my feeling (я позволил моему чувству) — my very strong feeling about the letter (моему очень сильному чувству относительно письма) to remain a mere impression (остаться простым впечатлением). I treated it (я отнесся к нему) as though it had been an intuition (как будто это была интуиция). In a well-balanced (в хорошо сбалансированном), reasoning mind (рассуждающем = склонном к рассудениям уме) there is no such thing as an intuition (нет такой вещи, как интуиция) — an inspired guess (вдохновенная догадка)! You can guess (вы можете догадаться), of course (конечно) — and a guess is either right (и догадка является либо правильной) or wrong (либо неправильной). If it is right (если она правильная) you call it an intuition (вы называете ее интуицией). If it is wrong (если она неверная) you usually do not speak of it again (вы обычно снова о ней не говорите).
But what is often called an intuition is really impression (но то, что часто называют интуицией, является на самом деле впечатлением) based on logical deduction (основанном на логической дедукции) or experience (или опыте). When an expert feels (когда эксперт чувствует) that there is something wrong about a picture (что с картиной что-то не так) or a piece of furniture (или с предметом мебели) or the signature on a cheque (или с подписью на чеке) he is really basing that feeling on a host of small signs and details (он, на самом деле, основывает это чувство на группе маленьких знаков и деталей). He has no need to go into them minutely (ему нет нужды вникать в них детально/досконально) — his experience obviates that (его опыт избегает этого) — the net result is the definite impression (конечный результат является определенным впечатлением) that something is wrong (что что-то неверно). But it is not a guess (но это не догадка), it is an impression based on experience (это есть впечатление, основанное на опыте)."
deduction [dI'dVkS(@)n], intuition [,Intju(:)IS(@)n], obviate ['ObvIeIt]
"Yes. But there, at the very start, I made a grave error. I permitted my feeling — my very strong feeling about the letter to remain a mere impression. I treated it as though it had been an intuition. In a well-balanced, reasoning mind them is no such thing as an intuition — an inspired guess! You can guess, of course — and a guess is either right or wrong. If it is right you call it an intuition. If it is wrong you usually do not speak of it again.
But what is often called an intuition is really impression based on logical deduction or experience. When an expert feels that there is something wrong about a picture or a piece of furniture or the signature on a cheque he is really basing that feeling on a host of small signs and details. He has no need to go into them minutely — his experience obviates that — the net result is the definite impression that something is wrong. But it is not a guess, it is an impression based on experience."