Иллюзия закона. Истории про то, как незнание своих прав делает нас уязвимыми

62. Правило судов по трудовым спорам 37(1).

63. Правило судов по трудовым спорам 39(1).

64. Правило судов по трудовым спорам 76(1).

65. Ministry of Justice, ‘Tribunals and gender recognition certificate statistics quarterly: July to September 2018’, Main Tables, ET3, Percentage of disposals by outcome and jurisdiction, 2007/8 to Q2 2018/19.

66. A. Beecroft, ‘Report on Employment Law’, 24 October 2011, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/31583/12-825-report-onemployment-law-beecroft.pdf

67. См.: Ian Murray MP, Draft Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013, First Delegated Legislation Committee Stage, Session 2013–14, 10 June 2013, Hansard, column 21.

68. A. Porter and R. Winnett, ‘Firms get powers to sack the slackers’, Telegraph, 9 January 2011, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/8249491/Firms-get-powers-to-sack-theslackers.html

69. См.: Lord Monks, Added Tribunals (Employment Tribunals and Employment Appeal Tribunal) Order 2013, 8 July 2013, Hansard, volume 747, column 83, https://hansard.parliament.uk/Lords/2013-07-08/debates/13070845000225/AddedTribunals(EmploymentTribunals AndEmploymentAppealTribunal)Order2013

70. См.: ‘A truly remarkable democratic mandate’, The Secret Barrister, 27 June 2016, https://thesecretbarrister.com/2016/06/27/a-truly– remarkable-democratic-mandate/

71. R (on the application of UNISON) v. Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, at [8].

72. Там же, на [35–7].

73. См.: Ian Murray MP, Draft Employment Tribunals and the Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013, First Delegated Legislation Committee Stage, Session 2013–14, 10 June 2013, Hansard, column 22.

74. ‘Survey of Employment Tribunal Applications (SETA) 2008: findings’, Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, 23 March 2010, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/survey-of-employment-tribunal-applications-seta-2008-findings

75. Lord Monks, Added Tribunals (Employment Tribunals and Employment Appeal Tribunal) Order 2013, 8 July 2013, Hansard, volume 747, column 83.

76. Baroness Whitaker, Added Tribunals (Employment Tribunals and Employment Appeal Tribunal) Order 2013, 8 July 2013, Hansard, volume 747, column 84.

77. Added Tribunals (Employment Tribunals and Employment Appeal Tribunal) Order 2013 (SI 2013/1892).

78. R (on the application of UNISON) v. Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, at [39].

79. Там же, на [40–2].

80. House of Commons Justice Committee, ‘Courts and tribunal fees’, 16 June 2016, at § 71 https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmjust/167/16701.html

81. Там же.

82. R (on the application of UNISON) v. Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, at [43–4].

83. House of Commons Justice Committee, ‘Courts and tribunal fees’, 16 June 2016, at § 69.

84. A. Grice, ‘Vince Cable interview: Charging fees for employment tribunals was “a very bad move”’, Independent, 29 April 2015, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/generalelection/vince-cable-interview-charging-fees-for-employment-tribunalswas-a-very-bad-move-10213703.html

85. Правительство ожидало уровень возмещения «около трети». В 2014/15 и 2015/16 годах уровень возмещения составил 13 процентов. См.: Unison at [56].

86. Unison, at [58–9].

87. Unison, at [57].

88. The Council of Employment Judges, ‘Submission on the Review of the Introduction of Employment Tribunal Fees’, 24 July 2015, https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/review-of-fees-in-employment-tribunals/supporting_documents/cejfeesreviewsubmission.pdf

89. Unison, at [55].

90. R (on the application of UNISON) v. Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51 at https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2015-0233.html

Глава пятая. Наши права человека

1. ‘Theresa May speech in full’, 4 October 2011, http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2011/10/04/theresa-may-speech-in-full

2. Имена изменены для защиты личности жертв. «Фиона» в ходе разбирательства именуется «DSD». «Маниша» упоминается как «NBV». Факты взяты из решения Высокого суда в 2014 году: DSDandanotherv. CommissionerofPoliceoftheMetropolis [2014] EWHC 436 (QB).

3. Там же, [308].

4. В таких случаях претензии могут быть предъявлены (как это сделали Фиона и Маниша) к самому преступнику, если у него есть средства для оплаты, и/или к Управлению по возмещению ущерба от преступлений, но до этого решения претензии не могли быть предъявлены к полиции.

5. Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (Appellant) v. DSD and another (Respondents) [2018] UKSC 11.

6. См.: I. Drury, ‘Folly of human rights luvvies: As actors fight plans to axe Human Rights Act, how thousands of foreign convicts use it to stay in Britain’, Daily Mail, 27 May 2015, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3098327/amp/Folly-human-rights-luvvies-actors-fight-plans-axe– Human-RightsAct-thousands-foreign-convicts-use-stay-Britain.html