Читаем The Loss of the SS. Titanic: Its Story and Its Lessons, by One of the Survivors полностью

I had been fortunate enough to secure a two-berth cabin to myself,—D 56,—quite close to the saloon and most convenient in every way for getting about the ship; and on a big ship like the Titanic it was quite a consideration to be on D deck, only three decks below the top or boat-deck. Below D again were cabins on E and F decks, and to walk from a cabin on F up to the top deck, climbing five flights of stairs on the way, was certainly a considerable task for those not able to take much exercise. The Titanic management has been criticised, among other things, for supplying the boat with lifts: it has been said they were an expensive luxury and the room they took up might have been utilized in some way for more life-saving appliances. Whatever else may have been superfluous, lifts certainly were not: old ladies, for example, in cabins on F deck, would hardly have got to the top deck during the whole voyage had they not been able to ring for the lift-boy. Perhaps nothing gave one a greater impression of the size of the ship than to take the lift from the top and drop slowly down past the different floors, discharging and taking in passengers just as in a large hotel. I wonder where the lift-boy was that night. I would have been glad to find him in our boat, or on the Carpathia when we took count of the saved. He was quite young,—not more than sixteen, I think,—a bright-eyed, handsome boy, with a love for the sea and the games on deck and the view over the ocean—and he did not get any of them. One day, as he put me out of his lift and saw through the vestibule windows a game of deck quoits in progress, he said, in a wistful tone, “My! I wish I could go out there sometimes!” I wished he could, too, and made a jesting offer to take charge of his lift for an hour while he went out to watch the game; but he smilingly shook his head and dropped down in answer to an imperative ring from below. I think he was not on duty with his lift after the collision, but if he were, he would smile at his passengers all the time as he took them up to the boats waiting to leave the sinking ship.

After undressing and climbing into the top berth, I read from about quarter-past eleven to the time we struck, about quarter to twelve. During this time I noticed particularly the increased vibration of the ship, and I assumed that we were going at a higher speed than at any other time since we sailed from Queenstown. Now I am aware that this is an important point, and bears strongly on the question of responsibility for the effects of the collision; but the impression of increased vibration is fixed in my memory so strongly that it seems important to record it. Two things led me to this conclusion—first, that as I sat on the sofa undressing, with bare feet on the floor, the jar of the vibration came up from the engines below very noticeably; and second, that as I sat up in the berth reading, the spring mattress supporting me was vibrating more rapidly than usual: this cradle-like motion was always noticeable as one lay in bed, but that night there was certainly a marked increase in the motion. Referring to the plan,[1] it will be seen that the vibration must have come almost directly up from below, when it is mentioned that the saloon was immediately above the engines as shown in the plan, and my cabin next to the saloon. From these two data, on the assumption that greater vibration is an indication of higher speed,—and I suppose it must be,—then I am sure we were going faster that night at the time we struck the iceberg than we had done before, i.e., during the hours I was awake and able to take note of anything.

FIG 4. TRANSVERSE VIEW OF THE DECKS THE TITANIC

S Sun deck

A Upper promenade deck

B Promenade deck, glass enclosed

C Upper deck

D Saloon deck

E Main deck

F Middle deck

G Lower deck: cargo, coal bunkers, boilers, engines

(a) Welin davits with lifeboats

(b) Bilge

(c) Double bottom

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Мсье Гурджиев
Мсье Гурджиев

Настоящее иссследование посвящено загадочной личности Г.И.Гурджиева, признанного «учителем жизни» XX века. Его мощную фигуру трудно не заметить на фоне европейской и американской духовной жизни. Влияние его поистине парадоксальных и неожиданных идей сохраняется до наших дней, а споры о том, к какому духовному направлению он принадлежал, не только теоретические: многие духовные школы хотели бы причислить его к своим учителям.Луи Повель, посещавший занятия в одной из «групп» Гурджиева, в своем увлекательном, богато документированном разнообразными источниками исследовании делает попытку раскрыть тайну нашего знаменитого соотечественника, его влияния на духовную жизнь, политику и идеологию.

Луи Повель

Биографии и Мемуары / Документальная литература / Самосовершенствование / Эзотерика / Документальное
Правда о допетровской Руси
Правда о допетровской Руси

Один из главных исторических мифов Российской империи и СССР — миф о допетровской Руси. Якобы до «пришествия Петра» наша земля прозябала в кромешном мраке, дикости и невежестве: варварские обычаи, звериная жестокость, отсталость решительно во всем. Дескать, не было в Московии XVII века ни нормального управления, ни боеспособной армии, ни флота, ни просвещения, ни светской литературы, ни даже зеркал…Не верьте! Эта черная легенда вымышлена, чтобы доказать «необходимость» жесточайших петровских «реформ», разоривших и обескровивших нашу страну. На самом деле все, что приписывается Петру, было заведено на Руси задолго до этого бесноватого садиста!В своей сенсационной книге популярный историк доказывает, что XVII столетие было подлинным «золотым веком» Русского государства — гораздо более развитым, богатым, свободным, гораздо ближе к Европе, чем после проклятых петровских «реформ». Если бы не Петр-антихрист, если бы Новомосковское царство не было уничтожено кровавым извергом, мы жили бы теперь в гораздо более счастливом и справедливом мире.

Андрей Михайлович Буровский

Биографии и Мемуары / Документальная литература / Публицистика / История
Семейный быт башкир.ХIХ-ХХ вв.
Семейный быт башкир.ХIХ-ХХ вв.

ББК 63.5Б 60Ответственный редактор доктор исторических наук Р.Г. КузеевРецензенты: кандидат исторических наук М.В.Мурзабулатов, кандидат филологических наук А.М.Сулейманов.Бикбулатов Н.В., Фатыхова Ф.Ф. Семейный быт башкир.Х1Х-ХХ вв.Ин-т истории, языка и литературы Башкир, науч, центра Урал, отд-ния АН СССР. - М.: Наука, 1991 - 189 стр. ISBN 5-02-010106-0На основе полевых материалов, литературных и архивных источников в книге исследуется традиционная семейная обрядность башкир, связанная с заключением брака, рождением, смертью, рассматривается порядок наследования и раздела семейного имущества в Х1Х-ХХ вв. Один из очерков посвящен преобразованиям в семейно-брачных отношениях и обрядности в современных условиях.Для этнографов, историков культуры, фольклористов.

Бикбулатов Н.В. Фатыхова Ф.Ф.

Документальная литература / Семейные отношения / История