Читаем Count Belisarius полностью

Then King Geilimer tried secretly to persuade some of our troops to mutiny: the Thracian Goths, who were their Arian co-religionists, and the Massagetic Huns, who had a grievance – when peace had been signed with Persia they had not been sent home to their native steppes at the other side of the Persian Empire, as had been promised, but shipped to Africa. The Goths merely laughed at the disloyal suggestion and reported it at once; but it was some time before Belisarius, by treating the Huns with particular honour and inviting them to a number of banquets, won their full confidence and made them confess that they had seriously considered the Vandal proposal – as he already knew from his lieutenant Aigan. They explained that they did not wish to be detained in Africa as garrison troops, to live and the so far from their homes. Such attractions as silk garments, and crystal drinking-vessels for their kavasse, and full bellies, and plump, loving women, could not outweigh their homesickness for the wide, windswept steppe and the wagons of their own folk. Then Belisarius swore an oath, by his own honour, that they would be allowed to go home as soon as the Vandals were conclusively defeated; and in return they swore renewed loyalty to him.

When, in early December, the wall was repaired and once more defensible throughout its seven-mile length even without the trench, Belisarius decided to lead his army out against the Vandals. If he were defeated now, he at least had a secure place for retreat. He commanded the infantry, which formed the main body, in person. The advance guard, consisting of all his cavalry except for 500 of his Household cuirassiers, whom he had kept behind with him, found the enemy at Tricamaron, twenty miles away, and attacked at once, as they had been ordered to do. The character of this battle was unusual. The Vandals, although again enormously superior in numbers, stood dully on the defensive, as if they were a poor sort of infantry recruits. Armenian John, at the head of the remaining 1,000 Household cuirassiers, tried to tempt them out against him by skirmishing attacks. At last, finding them immovable and realizing that they had lost all courage, he charged in earnest, unfurling the Imperial standard. Geilimer had, for some superstitious reason, ordered his men to discard lance and spear and fight only with their swords: which put them at a great disadvantage.

Soon Uliaris had the good fortune to kill Zazo with a lance-thrust; when his death was known the Vandal centre broke and (led back to their camp. The wings followed, as soon as the attack became general, without striking a blow. For a battle that was to settle the fate of a huge kingdom it was remarkably bloodless and one-sided, and lasted scarcely a full hour from start to finish. We lost fifty men, and they 800. Our infantry had again not come into action at all, for they were half a day's march behind. They arrived late that afternoon and prepared to attack the Vandal camp, which was a vast ring of covered country-wagons protected by a flimsy palisade.

When King Geilimer saw our main body approaching, he caught up his favourite little nephew, Ammatas's six-year-old son, set him on the crupper of his saddle, told him to hold tight, and galloped away with him, followed by a retinue of brothers-in-law and cousins and such-like; without so much as a word of explanation or apology to his generals. Being given so commanding an example of cowardice by their sovereign, these generals did not think to organize the defence of the camp. Squadron by squadron, the army scattered in all directions: a shameful prelude to a shameful scene.

Without a blow we captured the camp and everything that it contained; the men broke ranks and the game of grab-all began at once. Never was such plunder offered to a deserving soldiery. Not only was there plunder of gold and jewels, both ecclesiastical and personal, and carved ivories and silks from chests on the wagons, but also human plunder – the Vandal women and children, whom their menfolk had basely left to their fate. Now, Belisarius had made it clear enough that, although old military custom gave the victors of a battle a right to despoil the enemy's camp, he would hang or impale any man found guilty of rape, which was an offence against the laws of God. Belisarius, as you know, was in the habit of enforcing orders of this sort, and needed only to make a law once – unlike Justinian, his master, who often issued the same edict again and again, because, lacking the resolution to enforce it, he could thus at least keep the penalties fresh in the memory of his subjects.

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

О, юность моя!
О, юность моя!

Поэт Илья Сельвинский впервые выступает с крупным автобиографическим произведением. «О, юность моя!» — роман во многом автобиографический, речь в нем идет о событиях, относящихся к первым годам советской власти на юге России.Центральный герой романа — человек со сложным душевным миром, еще не вполне четко представляющий себе свое будущее и будущее своей страны. Его характер только еще складывается, формируется, причем в обстановке далеко не легкой и не простой. Но он — не один. Его окружает молодежь тех лет — молодежь маленького южного городка, бурлящего противоречиями, характерными для тех исторически сложных дней.Роман И. Сельвинского эмоционален, написан рукой настоящего художника, язык его поэтичен и ярок.

Илья Львович Сельвинский

Проза / Историческая проза / Советская классическая проза
Варяг
Варяг

Сергей Духарев – бывший десантник – и не думал, что обычная вечеринка с друзьями закончится для него в десятом веке.Русь. В Киеве – князь Игорь. В Полоцке – князь Рогволт. С севера просачиваются викинги, с юга напирают кочевники-печенеги.Время становления земли русской. Время перемен. Для Руси и для Сереги Духарева.Чужак и оболтус, избалованный цивилизацией, неожиданно проявляет настоящий мужской характер.Мир жестокий и беспощадный стал Сереге родным, в котором он по-настоящему ощутил вкус к жизни и обрел любимую женщину, друзей и даже родных.Сначала никто, потом скоморох, и, наконец, воин, завоевавший уважение варягов и ставший одним из них. Равным среди сильных.

Александр Владимирович Мазин , Александр Мазин , Владимир Геннадьевич Поселягин , Глеб Борисович Дойников , Марина Генриховна Александрова

Фантастика / Историческая проза / Попаданцы / Социально-философская фантастика / Историческая фантастика
Адмирал Колчак. «Преступление и наказание» Верховного правителя России
Адмирал Колчак. «Преступление и наказание» Верховного правителя России

Споры об адмирале Колчаке не утихают вот уже почти столетие – одни утверждают, что он был выдающимся флотоводцем, ученым-океанографом и полярным исследователем, другие столь же упорно называют его предателем, завербованным британской разведкой и проводившим «белый террор» против мирного гражданского населения.В этой книге известный историк Белого движения, доктор исторических наук, профессор МГПУ, развенчивает как устоявшиеся мифы, домыслы, так и откровенные фальсификации о Верховном правителе Российского государства, отвечая на самые сложные и спорные вопросы. Как произошел переворот 18 ноября 1918 года в Омске, после которого военный и морской министр Колчак стал не только Верховным главнокомандующим Русской армией, но и Верховным правителем? Обладало ли его правительство легальным статусом государственной власти? Какова была репрессивная политика колчаковских властей и как подавлялись восстания против Колчака? Как определялось «военное положение» в условиях Гражданской войны? Как следует классифицировать «преступления против мира и человечности» и «военные преступления» при оценке действий Белого движения? Наконец, имел ли право Иркутский ревком без суда расстрелять Колчака и есть ли основания для посмертной реабилитации Адмирала?

Василий Жанович Цветков

Биографии и Мемуары / Проза / Историческая проза