Feeley, Т. H. & deTurck, M. A. (1991). Perceptions of communication as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer: the case of lie detection. Paper presented at the International Communication Association Annual Conference, Montreal, Canada, 1991.
Feeley, Т. H. & deTurck, M. A. (1998). The behavioral correlates of sanctioned and unsanctioned deceptive communication. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22,189–204.
Feeley, T. H. & Young, M.J. (1991). Detecting deceptive communication: a narrative review. Unpublished manuscript.
Feeley, T. H., deTurck, M. A. & Young, M.J. (1995). Baseline familiarity in lie detection. Communication Research Reports, 12,160–169.
Feldman, R. S., Jenkins, L. & Popoola, O. (1919). Detection of deception in adults and children via facial expressions. Child Development, 50, 350–355.
Fiedler, K. & Walka, I. (1993). Training lie detectors to use nonverbal cues instead of global heuristics. Human Communication Research, 20,199–223.
Fisher, R. P. & Geiselman, R. E. (1992). Memory-enhancing techniques for investigative interviewing: the cognitive interview. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Flavell, J. FL, Botkin, P. T, Fry, С. K., Wright,J. С &Jarvis, P. T. (1968). The development of role-taking and communication skills in children. New York: John Wiley.
Foley, M.A. & Johnson, M.K. (1985). Confusions between memories for performed and imagined actions: a developmental comparison. Child Development, 56,1145–1155.
Ford, Ch. V. (1995). Lies! Lies!! Lies.!! The psychology of deceit. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Frank, M.G. & Ekman, P. (1991). The ability to detect deceit generalizes across different types of high-stake lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 1429–1439.
Freedman, J. L. Adam, E. K., Davey, S. A. & Koegl, C.J. (1996). The impact of a statement: more detail does not always help. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 1, 111–130.
Freud, S. (1959). Collected papers. New York: Basic Books.
Fugita, S. S., Wexley, K. N. & Hillery, J. M. (1914). Black-white differences in nonverbal behavior in an interview setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4,343–351.
Furedy, J.J. (1991a). Alice in Wonderland terminological usage in, and communicational concerns about, that peculiar flight of technological fancy: the CQT polygraph. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26, 241–241.
Furedy, J.J. (1991b). On the validity of the polygraph. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26, 211–213.
Furedy, J. J. (1993). The «control» question «test» (CQT) polygrapher's dilemma: logico-ethical considerations for psychophysiological practitioners and researchers..International Journal ofPsychophysiology, 15, 263–261.
Furedy, J. J. (1996a). Some elementary distinctions among, and comments concerning, the «control» question «test» (CQT) polygrapher's many problems: a reply to Honts, Kircher and Raskin. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 22, 53–59.
Furedy, J. J. (1996b). The North American polygraph and psychophysiology: disinterested, uninterested, and interested perspectives. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 91-105.
Furedy, J. J. & Heslegrave, R.J. (1988). Validity of the lie detector: a psychophysiological perspective. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 219–246.
Gale, A. (1988). The polygraph test, more than scientific investigation. In A. Gale (Ed.), The polygraph test: lies, truth and science. London: Sage, 1–9.
Garratt, G. A., Baxter, J. C. & Rozelle, R. M. (1981). Training university police in black-American nonverbal behavior.Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 211–229.
