8 The basic sources for the study of the Arras Vauderie are Jacques du Clercq, op. cit.
, Book V, and a tract against the sect called the Recollectio, printed in Hansen, Quellen, pp. 149-83. Amongst the many modern accounts, that by H. C. Lea. A history of the Inquisition of the middle ages, vol. III, London, 1888, pp. 519-30, remains unsurpassed.— 2 —
9 For the Greek text: L. Radermacher, “Griechische Quellen zur Faustsage”, in Sitzungsberichte der Wiener Akademie der Wissenschaften
, vol. 206 (4), Vienna, 1927, pp. 122-48. For a ninth-century Latin translation: Hincmar, De divortio Lotharii et Theutbergae, Interrogatio XV (Pat. lat. vol. 125, cols. 721-6).10 For the Greek text: Radermacher, op. cit.
, pp. 164–218. For a ninth-century Latin translation see Acta Sanctorum, 4 February, pp. 489-92.11 Cf. K. Plenzat, Die Theophiluslegende in den Dichtungen des Mittelalters
, Berlin, 1926 (Germanische Studien, vol. 43). For surveys of these and similar legends: P. M. Palmer and R. P. More, The sources of the Faust tradition, New York, 1936; L. Kretzenbacher, Teufelsbündner und Faustgestalten im Abendlande, Klagcnfurt, 1968.12 Walter Map, De Nugis Curialium
, Distinctio IV, cap. vi (Camden Society, vol. 50, London, 1850, p. 155).13 Caesarius of Heisterbach, Dialogus miraculorum
, Book V, chapter 28.14 See above, p. 62.
15 Augustine, De civitate Dei
, lib. XV, cap. 23.16 Isidore of Seville, Originum sive etymologiatum libri XX
, lib. VIII, cap. 11 (Pat. lat. vol. 82, col. 326).17 Adso of Montier-en-Der, Epistola ad Gerbergam reginarn de ortu et tempore Antichristi
, in E. Sackur, Sibyllinische Texte und Forschungen: Pseudomethodius, Adso und die tiburtinische Sibylle, Halle, 1898, pp. 106-7.18 See above, p. 151.
19 Hincmar, De divortio Lotharii et Theutbergae
, Interrogatio XV (Pat. lat. vol. 125, col. 725).20 Guibert de Nogent, Histoire de sa vie (1053–1124),
ed. G. Bourgin, Paris, 1907, lib. I, cap. xiii, pp. 43-4.21 Amaud (or Ernaud), abbot of Bonneval, Liber Secundus of Sancti Bernardi Vita Prima
, cap. vi (Pat. lat. vol. 185, cols. 287-8).22 Caesarius of Heisterbach, Dialogus miraculorum
, Book III, chapter 8.23 Ibid.
, Book III, chapter 9.24 Ibid.
, Book III, chapter 10.25 Guilielmus Alvernus, De universo creaturarum
, Part III, cap. xxx, in Opera omnia, Orléans, 1674, vol. I, pp. 1070-3. See above, pp. 213-14.26 Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologica
, Part I, quaestio li, art iii (Opera, Venice, 1787, vol. XX, pp. 243-4); Commentum in quatuor libros Sententiarum Magistri Petri Lombardi, lib. II, Distinctio VIII, quaestio i, art. iv, solutio ii (Ibid., 1777, vol. X, p. 105).27 Text in Hansen, Quellen
, pp. 88-9; and see above, pp. 219-20.28 Ibid.
, pp. 99-104.29 Ibid.
, pp. 118-22.30 Ibid.
, pp. 133-45.— 3 —
31 E. Hoffmann-Krayer, “Luzemer Akten zum Hexen- und Zauberwesen”, in Schweizerisches Archiv für
Volkskunde, vol. III, Zurich, 1899, pp. 22–40, 82-122, 189–224, 291–325.32 Ibid.
, pp. 117-21.33 Ibid.
, pp. 33-8.34 Ibid.
, pp. 103-17.35 Ibid.
, pp. 198–204. For similar cases, see Ibid., pp. 95-7, 193-7, 210-11.36 G. L. Kittredge, Witchcraft in Old and New England
, Cambridge, Mass., 1929, pp. 6-20.37 Ibid.
, p. 8. The original depositions are at Harvard.38 Ibid.
, p. 10.39 A. Macfarlane, Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart England
, London, 1970. See also C. L’Estrange Ewen, Witch hunting and witch trials, London and New York, 1929, and Witchcraft and demonianism, London, 1933.40 Macfarlane, op. cit.
, p. 174.41 See above, p. 242.
42 Diebold Schilling, Luzerner Bilderchronik
, ed. R. Durrer and P. Hilber, Geneva, 1932, p. 143, with picture at Tafel 280.43 Cf. E. Delcambre, Le concept de la sorcellerie dans le duché de Lorraine au XVIe
et XVIIe siècle, Nancy, 1948, Fascicule 3, pp. 205 seq.; J. Schacher, Das Hexenwesen im Kanton Luzern, Luzern, 1947, pp. 98 seq.