Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

<p><emphasis>Ardito </emphasis>in Portugal: Plant Breeding and the Fascist Corporatist State</p>

After the discussion of Strampelli’s strains and their resistance to lodging, it doesn’t take much to understand the importance of technoscientific organisms in making plausible the alternative modernity of Portuguese fascism. Large estates maintained and expanded through chemical fertilizers made sense only if there were plants that could profit from them without lodging. And here I’m not making just a comparative formal remark between Italy and Portugal. In fact, the Italian case meant much more than an inspiring example useful for quotations in newspapers and leaflets praising Mussolini and his policies. The soils of both countries, trusted with the burden of feeding the two nations and enhancing the qualities of the Italian and Portuguese populations, were to be related in a much more material way. The Portuguese wheat estates were also cultivated with Strampelli’s “elite races,” Ardito and Mentana.

Figure 2.4 Artur Pastor, “Mechanic Sower, Alentejo, 1940s.(Fundo Artur Pastor, Arquivo Municipal de Lisboa)

The use of Strampelli’s early wheats in Portugal was advanced by a severe attack of stem rust—Puccinia graminis—in 1928, the year before the Wheat campaign started, with disastrous consequences for the year’s grain harvest.[55] Each of the Portuguese varieties used in the 1920s had a long development cycle, harvested only by mid June and thus exposed to both Puccinia attacks and dry hot eastern winds (Suão). It was with great enthusiasm that Portuguese farmers, particularly those of the large southern estates of Alentejo, began to cultivate their lands with Ardito, which combined resistance to lodging and rust with short cycles.[56]

The Italian elite races of wheat were not simply imported. As had happened in Italy with the use of Carlotta Strampelli in the Mezzogiorno, in Portugal there was quick disappointment with the promises of geneticists, for the imported varieties had been designed for very different conditions. In particular, Ardito and Mentana were bred to reveal their favorable yielding properties in the highly fertile areas of northern and central Italy, which had little in common with the semi-arid Alentejo region. It is thus no surprise that Câmara, whose family also owned a large wheat estate in Alentejo, in his effort to intensify wheat cultivation in Portugal during his years as head of the Wheat Campaign, conducted experiments on the best cultivation methods to profit from Strampelli’s varieties.[57] In trials started in 1928 at the Agronomy Institute, he subjected Ardito, Mentana, and Villa Glori to different culturing techniques, controlling processes and fertilizers’ doses in an effort to determine what methods would work best for Portuguese farmers.

To repeat, the circulation of geneticists’ artifacts was not an automatic procedure. It was the role of local scientists, Câmara among them, to adapt Italian varieties to Portuguese conditions, so that Strampelli’s Ardito or Mentana could circulate between Rieti and Alentejo. Breeding was also part of the transfer process. Instead of starting a hybridization program from scratch with no immediate results (for it was estimated that a 10 year period was necessary for the production of a new hybrid), Portuguese breeders’ first step was to concentrate on making pedigree selections of imported Italian wheats, a much quicker procedure.[58]

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции
1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции

В представленной книге крушение Российской империи и ее последнего царя впервые показано не с точки зрения политиков, писателей, революционеров, дипломатов, генералов и других образованных людей, которых в стране было меньшинство, а через призму народного, обывательского восприятия. На основе многочисленных архивных документов, журналистских материалов, хроник судебных процессов, воспоминаний, писем, газетной хроники и других источников в работе приведен анализ революции как явления, выросшего из самого мировосприятия российского общества и выражавшего его истинные побудительные мотивы.Кроме того, авторы книги дают свой ответ на несколько важнейших вопросов. В частности, когда поезд российской истории перешел на революционные рельсы? Правда ли, что в период между войнами Россия богатела и процветала? Почему единение царя с народом в августе 1914 года так быстро сменилось лютой ненавистью народа к монархии? Какую роль в революции сыграла водка? Могла ли страна в 1917 году продолжать войну? Какова была истинная роль большевиков и почему к власти в итоге пришли не депутаты, фактически свергнувшие царя, не военные, не олигархи, а именно революционеры (что в действительности случается очень редко)? Существовала ли реальная альтернатива революции в сознании общества? И когда, собственно, в России началась Гражданская война?

Дмитрий Владимирович Зубов , Дмитрий Михайлович Дегтев , Дмитрий Михайлович Дёгтев

Документальная литература / История / Образование и наука
100 великих казней
100 великих казней

В широком смысле казнь является высшей мерой наказания. Казни могли быть как относительно легкими, когда жертва умирала мгновенно, так и мучительными, рассчитанными на долгие страдания. Во все века казни были самым надежным средством подавления и террора. Правда, известны примеры, когда пришедшие к власти милосердные правители на протяжении долгих лет не казнили преступников.Часто казни превращались в своего рода зрелища, собиравшие толпы зрителей. На этих кровавых спектаклях важна была буквально каждая деталь: происхождение преступника, его былые заслуги, тяжесть вины и т.д.О самых знаменитых казнях в истории человечества рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Елена Н Авадяева , Елена Николаевна Авадяева , Леонид Иванович Зданович , Леонид И Зданович

История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии