Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

Although experimentation with pure lines by Portuguese breeders dated back to the beginnings of the century, not until 1926 had the Ministry of Agriculture begun to promote multiplications on a large scale with diffusion of some of the Central Agricultural Station’s pure lines derived from pedigree selections of traditional Portuguese wheat landraces.[66] The multiplication work was trusted to chosen farmers who received an extra payment for producing selected seed, which was then distributed by the state services.[67] As was stated above, the severe Puccinia attacks of 1928 played a decisive role in the adoption of Strampelli’s varieties by Portuguese farmers who preferred them to those wheats selected by the Central Agricultural Station, which with their long cycles of development were all very susceptible to rusts. The Wheat Campaign was responsible for the first distribution of the new Italian strains. From 1936 on, the National Federation of Wheat Producers (FNPT), the powerful corporatist agency created in 1932 by Salazar’s New State to integrate all the farmers involved in wheat production and to rule over the entire wheat circuit, would assume the control of the importing and distribution of Italian elite seeds.

In 1939, the FNPT began to finance the breeding work at the EAN, buying it more land and building new greenhouses to expand its breeding department in Elvas. The hybridization and selection work was thus accelerated. The breeding station released its first wheats in 1942 in an effort to overcome the shortage of Italian origin seeds that had been evident since the outbreak of World War II.[68] From the Elvas multiplication fields the seeds were distributed, just as in Italy, among a few selected large farmers who multiplied them on a large scale and sold the seeds at a generous fixed price to the FNPT. Then, after passing through one of the FNPT’s regional seed posts responsible for cleaning, calibration, and disinfection, seed bags were distributed among the extended network of 72 local delegations, which then sold them—also at a fixed price—to farmers. From 1942 to 1959, the plant-breeding station at Elvas was able to supply the FNPT with fourteen new pure lines from selections of the Portuguese wheats and eight new hybrids.[69] In the same period, the amount of selected seed distributed among the FNPT’s 150,000 associates increased from about 600 tons to 18,500 tons, which corresponded to about 25 percent of total wheat seeds sown each year in the Portuguese fields. The new hybrids produced by the Elvas breeding station as a result of the crossing of Portuguese varieties with Strampelli’s elite races, such as Ardito or Mentana, accounted for about 30 percent of the seeds distributed by the FNPT.[70]

It is possible to follow the increased presence in the territory of the Portuguese corporatist state through the FNPT’s growing infrastructure of distribution and storage. In 1935, only three years after its creation, the FNPT had built at least 300 new barns, constituting a striking material presence of the New State in the landscape. The expansion of storage capacity was central for an agency that bought all the wheat produced by Portuguese farmers. In subsequent years, the FNPT silo would become an obligatory landmark of the urban agglomerations of the wheat-producing regions, especially in Alentejo. Also, each new center for the selection and distribution of seeds was locally celebrated in propaganda events that dedicated the new facilities to the leaders of the fascist New State, António de Oliveira Salazar and António Óscar Fragoso Carmona.[71] In the 1950s there were more than twenty of these seed distribution centers. One of the most important was located, not surprisingly, in Elvas, the place as well of the breeding plots of the National Agricultural Experiment Station.

The FNPT had been founded in 1932 stemming from the “local barns” set up by the Wheat Campaign to collect and store harvested grain and to distribute certified seeds.[72] In 1935 those barns were converted into “wheat guilds,” and in 1939 they were integrated into the general corporatist structure of the Farmers’ Guilds (Grémios da Lavoura). Although membership in a Farmers’ Guild was compulsory for every landholder, only large ones were entitled to be electors and to be elected to its governing body. In other words, in Alentejo they were completely controlled by large landholders. Two hundred thirty Guilds worked as regional agents of the FNPT, buying wheat on behalf of the government, collecting data, selling tools and fertilizers, and, of course, distributing certified seeds.

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции
1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции

В представленной книге крушение Российской империи и ее последнего царя впервые показано не с точки зрения политиков, писателей, революционеров, дипломатов, генералов и других образованных людей, которых в стране было меньшинство, а через призму народного, обывательского восприятия. На основе многочисленных архивных документов, журналистских материалов, хроник судебных процессов, воспоминаний, писем, газетной хроники и других источников в работе приведен анализ революции как явления, выросшего из самого мировосприятия российского общества и выражавшего его истинные побудительные мотивы.Кроме того, авторы книги дают свой ответ на несколько важнейших вопросов. В частности, когда поезд российской истории перешел на революционные рельсы? Правда ли, что в период между войнами Россия богатела и процветала? Почему единение царя с народом в августе 1914 года так быстро сменилось лютой ненавистью народа к монархии? Какую роль в революции сыграла водка? Могла ли страна в 1917 году продолжать войну? Какова была истинная роль большевиков и почему к власти в итоге пришли не депутаты, фактически свергнувшие царя, не военные, не олигархи, а именно революционеры (что в действительности случается очень редко)? Существовала ли реальная альтернатива революции в сознании общества? И когда, собственно, в России началась Гражданская война?

Дмитрий Владимирович Зубов , Дмитрий Михайлович Дегтев , Дмитрий Михайлович Дёгтев

Документальная литература / История / Образование и наука
100 великих казней
100 великих казней

В широком смысле казнь является высшей мерой наказания. Казни могли быть как относительно легкими, когда жертва умирала мгновенно, так и мучительными, рассчитанными на долгие страдания. Во все века казни были самым надежным средством подавления и террора. Правда, известны примеры, когда пришедшие к власти милосердные правители на протяжении долгих лет не казнили преступников.Часто казни превращались в своего рода зрелища, собиравшие толпы зрителей. На этих кровавых спектаклях важна была буквально каждая деталь: происхождение преступника, его былые заслуги, тяжесть вины и т.д.О самых знаменитых казнях в истории человечества рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Елена Н Авадяева , Елена Николаевна Авадяева , Леонид Иванович Зданович , Леонид И Зданович

История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии