Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

To undertake pedigree selections in pure lines, such as the Italian elite races, seems to ignore the basic fact that their stability of properties is due to their homozygotic constitution, condemning to failure any further selection. But Câmara, in his role as head of the Genetics Laboratory of the Lisbon Agronomy Institute, was highly critical of the generalized gesture among breeders of accusing farmers of believing in the myth of degeneracy of the wheats supplied by agricultural experiment stations. The observed decay of yield or resistance properties observed by farmers in their fields was rejected by many breeders as being the result of mixing different varieties in the process of selecting seeds instead of “cultivating authentic pure lines distributed by Breeding Stations.”[59] The heterozygotic plants in the fields, with properties varying over time, were supposedly the result of careless ignorant farmers’ not following the advice of experts. The point is that Câmara was very assertive in discarding the notion of “pure line” used by most breeders with backgrounds in genetics, stating bluntly the impossibility of producing homozygotic plants concerning any of the characters worked by breeders.[60] Resistance to pathologies, drought, or cold, or properties of precocity and productivity, “are never dependent on a single gene,” being a function instead of the combination of several genes, and are “inherited following the system of quantitative characters.”[61] Against breeders who claimed to have a methodology to identify homozygotic specimens in the field, as Strampelli did, Câmara offered the counterfactual of a property depending on twenty cumulative factors—far fewer than those usually affecting properties targeted by breeders. The desired homozygotic condition in all twenty factors would surface only after 1,099,511,627,776 plants. And that figure was calculated by “considering all factors acting the same way and in the same direction, ignoring expression inhibition interactions among factors.”

In fact, the possibility of cultivating Ardito in Alentejo was due exactly to the impurity of pure lines. In the first years after being introduced, its glumes were so loose and the percentage of seeds falling to the ground so high that it was considered unlikely ever to thrive in Portugal. But according to Câmara, “the instability of the Ardito lines allowed for a segregation of relatively important amplitude.”[62] By harvest time, much more grain was collected from spikes resistant to “natural threshing than from those bearing the undesired genetic condition. Selection was thus made in the direction favorable to agriculture.” The absurdity of the concept of absolutely stable lines was obvious. Locality was still crucial in genetic flows.

Elvas would be the place selected to install the breeding plots of the National Agricultural Experiment Station (Estação Agronómica Nacional), the new institution founded in 1936 and directed by Câmara after his work for the Wheat Campaign. A town located in the northeast of Alentejo, in the heart of the Portuguese wheat belt, Elvas has the driest climate in the country. Moreover, inside a 20-kilometer radius it possesses almost all the soil types of the wheat region. Such characteristics account for why seeds originating from Elvas had been traditionally praised for their good behavior in other environments. In fact, an extension post of the Ministry of Agriculture had been founded in 1926 in Elvas to take advantage of the area’s reputation as the place for the “tuning” of wheats.[63] Like Rieti, Elvas offered the perfect conditions both for breeding research and seed production. In 1937, a year after the founding of the EAN, the breeding department started its operations, occupying and expanding the facilities of the previous extension post.

The collections that constituted the obligatory starting point of the breeders’ work originated from the Central Agricultural Station (Estação Agrária Central)—the predecessor institution of the EAN—and from the Swedish plant-breeding station at Svalöf.[64] The Central Agricultural Station collection had about 8,000 samples of Portuguese landraces, some gathered by agricultural scientists surveying the country fields and some sent in by farmers. The Swedish collection, on the other hand, probably arrived at Elvas in the hands of D. R. Victória Pires, the agricultural scientist head of the breeding department of the EAN, who in 1934 held a scholarship granted by the Board of National Education for a stay in Svalöf.[65]

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции
1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции

В представленной книге крушение Российской империи и ее последнего царя впервые показано не с точки зрения политиков, писателей, революционеров, дипломатов, генералов и других образованных людей, которых в стране было меньшинство, а через призму народного, обывательского восприятия. На основе многочисленных архивных документов, журналистских материалов, хроник судебных процессов, воспоминаний, писем, газетной хроники и других источников в работе приведен анализ революции как явления, выросшего из самого мировосприятия российского общества и выражавшего его истинные побудительные мотивы.Кроме того, авторы книги дают свой ответ на несколько важнейших вопросов. В частности, когда поезд российской истории перешел на революционные рельсы? Правда ли, что в период между войнами Россия богатела и процветала? Почему единение царя с народом в августе 1914 года так быстро сменилось лютой ненавистью народа к монархии? Какую роль в революции сыграла водка? Могла ли страна в 1917 году продолжать войну? Какова была истинная роль большевиков и почему к власти в итоге пришли не депутаты, фактически свергнувшие царя, не военные, не олигархи, а именно революционеры (что в действительности случается очень редко)? Существовала ли реальная альтернатива революции в сознании общества? И когда, собственно, в России началась Гражданская война?

Дмитрий Владимирович Зубов , Дмитрий Михайлович Дегтев , Дмитрий Михайлович Дёгтев

Документальная литература / История / Образование и наука
100 великих казней
100 великих казней

В широком смысле казнь является высшей мерой наказания. Казни могли быть как относительно легкими, когда жертва умирала мгновенно, так и мучительными, рассчитанными на долгие страдания. Во все века казни были самым надежным средством подавления и террора. Правда, известны примеры, когда пришедшие к власти милосердные правители на протяжении долгих лет не казнили преступников.Часто казни превращались в своего рода зрелища, собиравшие толпы зрителей. На этих кровавых спектаклях важна была буквально каждая деталь: происхождение преступника, его былые заслуги, тяжесть вины и т.д.О самых знаменитых казнях в истории человечества рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Елена Н Авадяева , Елена Николаевна Авадяева , Леонид Иванович Зданович , Леонид И Зданович

История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии