Читаем Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism полностью

The corporatist structure of the FNPT and the regional Guilds was complemented at the local level by a third institution: the Casas do Povo (Houses of the People), designed to promote basic welfare policies among rural workers and replacing any form of labor unionization.[73] The regime hoped to put an end to social unrest in the Portuguese fields by building about 4,000 of these institutions across the country, combining health and social services (retirement and unemployment savings), basic instruction, and local improvements such as roads and sewage works (important in winter, when work in the fields was scarce). If by 1940 about half of the parishes in Alentejo had Casas do Povo encompassing about 150,000 members, that figure would climb to almost 90 percent in 1950, a growth aimed at alleviating the social problems arising from the large wheat estates’ allegedly harmonious political economy.

Figure 2.5 Artur Pastor, “Grain Silos, Alentejo, 1940s.”(Fundo Artur Pastor, Arquivo Municipal de Lisboa)

The Casas do Povo worked as institutions for the social control of the masses of wage laborers and sharecroppers. In order to get social benefits, one had to attend mass, be diligent at work, stop demanding better conditions, and be respectful of social hierarchies.[74] After all, local notable men, meaning large estate owners, also formed the board of directors of the Casas do Povo. In fact, the funds for this primitive form of state welfare, the first to systematically reach Portuguese rural populations, originated from the Farmers’ Guilds and from the FNPT, the upper levels of the hierarchical corporatist structure. As was stated by the regime’s ideologue responsible for the design of the system, “the organic framework of the rural population through the Casas do Povo proclaims clearly and indisputably the intransigent realism of our corporatist structure.”[75]

During the 1930s there was no large-scale social turmoil in the Alentejo region. Sharecroppers cultivated the heaths and received subsidies for expanding wheat acreage, and wage laborers were employed by estates profiting from high wheat prices. But from 1943 until 1962, the rising seasonal unemployment, due to increasing mechanization and the expulsion of sharecroppers from eroded thin schist soils, would transform Alentejo into an area of growing communist resistance to the regime.[76] The corporatist structure integrated every individual into an allegedly organic unit, and those agitating for better wages or other forms of political representation and work unionization outside the state system became objects of violent repression by the National Republican Guard or the Political Police, articulated with a politically controlled judiciary system and concentration camps in the colonies.[77] As one of the grimmest slogans of Salazar’s New State put it, “a place for everyone; each one in its proper place.”[78]

To summarize, the geneticist António Sousa da Câmara was the executive organizer of the Wheat Campaign, and the National Agricultural Experiment Station (EAN) was born directly from the recognition of the importance of his research for food self-sufficiency. The National Federation of Wheat Producers (FNPT) funded much of the work undertaken by the breeding department of the EAN in Elvas. In the opposite direction, the high-yielding seeds of the breeder’s plots of Elvas sustained the extended distribution network of the FNPT. The new strains and their response to chemical fertilizers were crucial in sustaining and enlarging the large wheat estates, the core of the system.

Перейти на страницу:

Все книги серии Inside Technology

Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism
Fascist Pigs: Technoscientific Organisms and the History of Fascism

In the fascist regimes of Mussolini's Italy, Salazar's Portugal, and Hitler's Germany, the first mass mobilizations involved wheat engineered to take advantage of chemical fertilizers, potatoes resistant to late blight, and pigs that thrived on national produce. Food independence was an early goal of fascism; indeed, as Tiago Saraiva writes in Fascist Pigs, fascists were obsessed with projects to feed the national body from the national soil. Saraiva shows how such technoscientific organisms as specially bred wheat and pigs became important elements in the institutionalization and expansion of fascist regimes. The pigs, the potatoes, and the wheat embodied fascism. In Nazi Germany, only plants and animals conforming to the new national standards would be allowed to reproduce. Pigs that didn't efficiently convert German-grown potatoes into pork and lard were eliminated.Saraiva describes national campaigns that intertwined the work of geneticists with new state bureaucracies; discusses fascist empires, considering forced labor on coffee, rubber, and cotton in Ethiopia, Mozambique, and Eastern Europe; and explores fascist genocides, following Karakul sheep from a laboratory in Germany to Eastern Europe, Libya, Ethiopia, and Angola.Saraiva's highly original account — the first systematic study of the relation between science and fascism — argues that the "back to the land" aspect of fascism should be understood as a modernist experiment involving geneticists and their organisms, mass propaganda, overgrown bureaucracy, and violent colonialism.Inside Technologyedited by Wiebe E. Bijker, W. Bernard Carlson, and Trevor J. PinchA list of the series appears at the back of the book.

Tiago Saraiva

История

Похожие книги

1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции
1917: русская голгофа. Агония империи и истоки революции

В представленной книге крушение Российской империи и ее последнего царя впервые показано не с точки зрения политиков, писателей, революционеров, дипломатов, генералов и других образованных людей, которых в стране было меньшинство, а через призму народного, обывательского восприятия. На основе многочисленных архивных документов, журналистских материалов, хроник судебных процессов, воспоминаний, писем, газетной хроники и других источников в работе приведен анализ революции как явления, выросшего из самого мировосприятия российского общества и выражавшего его истинные побудительные мотивы.Кроме того, авторы книги дают свой ответ на несколько важнейших вопросов. В частности, когда поезд российской истории перешел на революционные рельсы? Правда ли, что в период между войнами Россия богатела и процветала? Почему единение царя с народом в августе 1914 года так быстро сменилось лютой ненавистью народа к монархии? Какую роль в революции сыграла водка? Могла ли страна в 1917 году продолжать войну? Какова была истинная роль большевиков и почему к власти в итоге пришли не депутаты, фактически свергнувшие царя, не военные, не олигархи, а именно революционеры (что в действительности случается очень редко)? Существовала ли реальная альтернатива революции в сознании общества? И когда, собственно, в России началась Гражданская война?

Дмитрий Владимирович Зубов , Дмитрий Михайлович Дегтев , Дмитрий Михайлович Дёгтев

Документальная литература / История / Образование и наука
100 великих казней
100 великих казней

В широком смысле казнь является высшей мерой наказания. Казни могли быть как относительно легкими, когда жертва умирала мгновенно, так и мучительными, рассчитанными на долгие страдания. Во все века казни были самым надежным средством подавления и террора. Правда, известны примеры, когда пришедшие к власти милосердные правители на протяжении долгих лет не казнили преступников.Часто казни превращались в своего рода зрелища, собиравшие толпы зрителей. На этих кровавых спектаклях важна была буквально каждая деталь: происхождение преступника, его былые заслуги, тяжесть вины и т.д.О самых знаменитых казнях в истории человечества рассказывает очередная книга серии.

Елена Н Авадяева , Елена Николаевна Авадяева , Леонид Иванович Зданович , Леонид И Зданович

История / Энциклопедии / Образование и наука / Словари и Энциклопедии