[Шишков 1858] – Мнение вице-адмирала Шишкова о мельнице, понадобившейся в казну и за которую владелец просит дорого // Чтения в Императорском обществе истории и древностей Российских при Московском университете. 1858. Кн. 4. С. 133–136.
[Эльяшевич 1948] – Эльяшевич В. Б.
История права поземельной собственности в России. Т. 1: Юридический строй поземельных отношений в XIII–XVI вв. Paris: Société anonyme imprimerie de Navarre, 1948.[Alexander 1997] – Alexander G. S.
Commodifying Humans: Property in the Antebellum Legal Discourse of Slavery // Alexander G. S. Commodity and Propriety: Competing Visions of Property in American Legal Thought, 1776–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997. P. 211–240.[Bartlett 1979] – Bartlett R. P.
Human Capital: The Settlement of Foreigners in Russia, 1762–1804. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press, 1979.[Bethell 1998] – Bethell T.
The Noblest Triumph: Property and Prosperity through the Ages. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1998.[Epstein 1966] – Epstein K.
The Genesis of German Conservatism. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966.[Fox-Genovese 1983] – Fox-Genovese E.
Physiocracy and Propertied Individualism: The Unfolding of Bourgeois Property in Unfree Labor Systems // Fox-Genovese E., Genovese E. D. Fruits of Merchant Capital: Slavery and Bourgeois Property in the Rise and Expansion of Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983. P. 272–298.[Getzler 1998] – Getzler J.
Roman Ideas of Landownership // Land Law: Themes and Perspectives / Ed. by S. Bright and J. Dewar. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998. P. 81–106.[Gurvitch 1932] – Gurvitch G.
L’idée du droit social. Notion et système du droit social: Histoire doctrinale depuis 17 sciècle jusqu’à fin de 19 sciècle. Paris: Librairie de Recueil Sirey, 1932.[Hont 2005] – Hont I.
Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, Mass.: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2005.[Jones 1973] – Jones R. E.
The Emancipation of the Russian Nobility, 1762–1785. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973.[Kivelson 2006] – Kivelson V.
Cartographies of Tsardom: The Land and Its Meanings in Seventeenth-Century Russia. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Press, 2006.[Kotsonis 2004] – Kotsonis Y.
“No Place to Go”: Taxation and State Transformation in Late Imperial and Early Soviet Russia // The Journal of Modern History. 2004. Vol. 76. № 3. P. 531–577.[Krieger 1957] – Krieger L.
The German Idea of Freedom: History of a Political Tradition from the Reformation to 1871. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957.[Mannheim 1971] – Mannheim K.
Conservative Thought // From Karl Mannheim / Ed. by K. H. Wolff. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971. P. 132–222.[Möser 1842] – Möser J.
Von dem echten Eigenthum // Justus Möser’s sämtliche Werke / Neu geordnet und aus dem nachlasse desselben gemehrt durch B. R. Abeken. 3. Theil. Berlin: Verlag der Nikolaischen Bachhandlung, 1842. S. 158–162.[Muller 1990] – Muller J. Z.
Justus Möser and the Conservative Critique of Early Modern Capitalism // Central European History. 1990. Vol. 23. № 2/3. P. 153–178.[Pipes 1994] – Pipes R.
Was There Private Property in Muscovite Russia? // Slavic Review. 1994. Vol. 53. № 2. P. 524–530.[Pipes 2000] – Pipes R.
Private Property Comes to Russia: The Reign of Catherine II // Cultures and Nations of Central and Eastern Europe: Essays in Honor of Roman Szporluk / Ed. by Z. Gitelman et al. Cambridge, Mass.: Ukrainian Research Institute; Harvard University, 2000. P. 431–442.[Purdy 2010] – Purdy J.
The Meaning of Property: Freedom, Community, and the Legal Imagination. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2010.[Radin 1982] – Radin M. J.
Property and Personhood // Stanford Law Review. 1982. Vol. 34. P. 957–1015.[Raeff 1974] – Raeff M.
The Empress and the Vinerian Professor: Catherine II’s Projects of Government Reforms and Blackstone’s Commentaries // Oxford Slavonic Papers: New Series. 1974. Vol. VII. P. 18–41.[Raeff 1975] – Raeff M.
The Well-Ordered Police State and the Development of Modernity in Seventeenth– and Eighteenth-Century Europe: An Attempt at a Comparative Approach // American Historical Review. 1975. Vol. 80. № 5. P. 1221–1243.[Rose 1996] – Rose C. M.
Property as the Keystone Right? // Notre Dame Law Review. 1996. Vol. 71. № 3. P. 329–365.[Thompson 1991] – Thompson E. P.
Custom, Law and Common Right // Customs in Common. London: Merlin Press, 1991. P. 97–184.[Weickhardt 1993] – Weickhardt G. G.
Pre-Petrine Law of Property // Slavic Review. 1993. Vol. 52. № 4. P. 663–679.[Weickhardt 1994] – Weickhardt G. G.
Was There Private Property in Muscovite Russia? (Response to Richard Pipes) // Slavic Review. 1994. Vol. 53. № 2. P. 531–538.