17. See, e.g., A. Miliukov, Rasskazy iz obydennogo byta
, 2d ed. (St. Petersburg, 1875), 49–54.18. See “Podgotovitel’nye rasporiazheniia pered pereezdom na dachu,” Domostroi, no.
1 (1892), 2–3. An alternative was to put furniture in storage, a practice described
in E. Mandel’shtam, “Vospominaniia,”
Novyi mir, no. 10 (1995), 126.19. The financial advantages of moving from an expensive city apartment to a cheap dacha
in a village outside Moscow are emphasized in M. Tikhomirov, “Detskie gody: Moskva
i podmoskov’e,”
Moskovskii arkhiv 1 (Moscow, 1996): esp. 482–83. Tikhomirov, later a well-known historian, was born in
1893 into a petit bourgeois family: his father worked all his life for the Morozovs,
a prominent late imperial family of entrepreneurs.20. “Peterburgskie otgoloski,” PG
, 15 May 1875, 1.21. “Podgotovitei’nye raporiazheniia.” Well-to-do families would send an advance party
of servants so as to give the house a thorough spring cleaning: see V. N. Kharuzina,
Proshloe: Vospominaniia detskikh i otrocheskikh let (Moscow, 1999), 268. Kharuzina (born in 1866 into a prosperous merchant family) is
here recalling the 1870s.22. For two well-researched but, in the conclusions they draw, radically opposed studies
of the post-Emancipation nobility, see R. Manning,
The Crisis of the Old Order in Russia (Princeton, 1982), and S. Becker, Nobility and Privilege in Late Imperial Russia (De Kalb, Ill., 1985).23. M. Gavlin, Rossiiskie Medichi: Portrety predprinimatelei
(Moscow, 1996), 75. A similar example was Liublino, an estate that was bought by
a merchant in mid-century and developed as a dacha settlement: see K. A. Aver’ianov,
“Liublino,” in Istoriia sel i dereven’ podmoskov’ia XIV-XX vv., vol. 2 (Moscow, 1993), 69.24. Details in this paragraph are drawn from conversations with the present inhabitants
of these dachas, who are for the most part descendants of the original owners.
25. G. V. Il’in, “Zelenograd (vozniknovenie i razvitie),” Russkii gorod 5
(1982): 40.26. G. Znakomyi, Dachi i okrestnosti Peterburga
(St. Petersburg, 1891), 44.27. S. Smirnov, Putevoditel’ ot Moskvy do Troitskoi Sergievoi Lavry
(Moscow, 1882), 10–11.28. A. Benois, Memoirs
, vol. 1 (London, 1988), chap. 11.29. Materialy po statistike narodnogo khoziaistva, vol. 16, Chastnovladel’cheskoe khoziaistvo
v S.-Peterburgskom uezde (St. Petersburg, 1891), 26–31.
30. V. Bur’ianov, Progulka s det’mi po S. Peterburgu i ego okrestnostiam
(St. Petersburg, 1838), 3:196. A similar but less informative account is I. Pushkarev,
Putevoditel’ po Sanktpeterburgu i okrestnostiam ego (St. Petersburg, 1843), 465–66.31. “Chto ob nas govoriat i pishut?” PLL
, 6 June 1882, 2–3. The population ofShuvalovo (the lakes and Pargolovo I) was in
1881 estimated to be 30,000; in Pargolovo II there were 277 male property owners and
in Pargolovo III 141. See Peterburgskie dachnye mestnosti v otnoshenii ikh zdorovosti (St. Petersburg, 1881), 21–22.32. The terms of leases varied significantly from one location to another: for lands
in private ownership a typical period was twenty-five or thirty years, but further
conditions could be imposed. Dacha plots at the estate of Levashevo (north of St.
Petersburg) had to be not less than half of one desiatina in area, and on this land
only one dwelling could be built; for this reason, the take-up rate in the 1880s was
much lower than in Pargolovo or Shuvalovo (see Fedotov,
Opisanie, 54–57).33. V. N. Sveshnikova, “Liniia Rikhimiaki-Sankt-Peterburg Finliandskoi zheleznoi dorogi
(ot Sankt-Peterburga do Beloostrova),” in
Pamiatniki istorii i kul’tury Sankt-Peterburga: Sbornik nauchnykh statei, ed. A. V. Kornilova (St. Petersburg, 1994), 39–40. The statutes of the dacha company
(tovarishchestvo) were published in PSZ, ser. 2, 52, no. 57577 (16 July 1877); the founders were high-ranking civil servants
and members of the military and of the first and second merchants’ guilds.