7. Ickes, «After the Oil Deluge,» p. 39 («cunning»). Roosevelt to Rayburn, May 22, 1934 («wretched conditions»); Grilling to Pearson, telegram, with Ickes to Mclntyre, June 9, 1934 («hot oil boys»); Personal Assistant to Mclntyre, October 19, 1934 («heaven and earth»); Cummings to Roosevelt, December 30, 1934 («good progress»), Oil, Official File 56, Roosevelt papers. Ickes, Secret Diary,
vol. 1, pp. 65 («broad powers»), 86 («prepared the allocation»); Hardwicke, Antitrust Laws, pp. 51–53; Nordhauser, Quest for Stability, p. 124 («now to doomsday»); James A. Veasey, «Legislative Control of the Business of Producing Oil and Gas,» in Report of the 15th Annual Meeting of the American Bar Association (Baltimore: Lord Baltimore Press, 1927), pp. 577–630.8. Thompson to Roosevelt, n.d., 1937 («this treaty»); Ickes to Roosevelt, May 4, 1935, Oil, Official File 56, Roosevelt papers. Joe S. Bain, The Economics of the Pacific Coast Petroleum Industry, pt. I, Market Structure
(Berkeley: University of California Press, 1944), pp. 60–66; Zimmermann, Conservation, p. 207; Wilkins, Maturing of Multinational Enterprise, pp. 210–11; Fanning, American Petroleum Institute, pp. 133–36; Lieuwen, Petroleum in Venezuela, pp. 56–60; United States Department of Commerce, Minerals Yearbook, 1932–1933 (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1933), p. 497 (tariff).9. Thompson to Roosevelt, n.d., 1937, Oil, Official File 56, Roosevelt papers («cooperation and coordination»); McLean and Haigh, Integrated Oil Companies,
p. 113; Robert E. Hardwicke, «Market Demand as a Factor in the Conservation of Oil,» in First Annual Institute on Oil and Gas Law (New York: Matthew Bender, 1949), pp. 176–79; Nordhauser, Quest for Stability, p. 127; Williamson et al., Age of Energy, pp. 559–60.
Глава 141. «Particulars Regarding Achnacarry Castle, Season 1928,» SC7/A24, Shell archives (Malcolm and Hillcart); Daily Express,
August 13,1928 («no warning»); Wall and Gibb, Teagle, pp. 259–61 («hellions»).2. Loxley and Collier minutes, April 4, 1930, N2149/FO 371/14816, PRO; Deterding to Riedemann, Oct. 20, 1927, 5-5-35 file, case 6, Oil Companies papers; Jones, State and British Oil,
p. 236; Larson, Standard Oil, vol. 3, p. 306; Leslie Hannah, The Rise of the Corporate Economy, 2d. ed. (London: Methuen, 1976), chaps. 2, 4, 7; Wilkins, Multinational Enterprise.3. Rowland, Cadman,
p. 55 (Cadman's academic opponent). Cadman discussion with Fisher, Barstow et al., February 1928, T161/284/533045/2; Hopkins to Chancellor of Exchequer, February 10, 1928, T161/284/533048/1 («alliance»); Committee on Imperial Defense, Proposed Agreement, February 16, 1928, T8/T10, T161/284/33045/2; Treasury and Admiralty, «Anglo-Persian Oil Company: Scheme of Distribution in the Middle East,» T161/284/533048/1 («irritability,» «long run» and «similar alliances»); Churchill to Hopkins, February 12, 1928, T161/284/ 533048 («singularly inopportune»); Oliphant minute, Feb. 15, 1928, A1270/6, FO 371/12835; Barstow and Packe to the Treasury, March 15, 1928, T161/284/33045/2; Wilson to Waterfield, February 13, 1928, T161/284/533048/1 («amalgamation»), PRO. Ferrier, British Petroleum, pp. 514, 510.4. Weill to the Baron, March 5, 1929, 132 АО 1052, Rothschild papers; United States Congress, Senate, Foreign Relations Committee, Subcommittee on Multinational Corporations, Multinational Corporations and United
States Foreign Policy, part 8 (Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1975), pp. 30–33 («As-Ls»), 35–39 («problem,» «destructive» and «Association») — hereafter Multinational Hearings; Larson, Standard Oil, vol. 3, pp. 308–9; U.S. Congress, Senate. Committee on Small Business, Subcommittee on Monopoly, The International Petroleum Cartel: Staff Report to the Federal Trade Commission (Washington, D.C.: 1952)—hereafter FTC, International Petroleum Cartel pp. 199–229; Ferrier, British Petroleum, p. 513; Jones, State and British Oil, p. 236; Tolf, Russian Rockefellers, p. 224.