Добыча: Всемирная история борьбы за нефть, деньги и власть

5. Campbell to Cushendun, October 29, 1928, A7452/1270/45, FO 371/12835; Jackson to Broderick, September 26, November 17, 1930, A6632, FO 371/14296, PRO. FTC, International Petroleum Cartel, p. 270 («fringe»); Kessler to Teagle, September 13, 1928, «misc.» file, case 9, Oil Companies papers («figures»).

6. Roy Leigh, «Interview with Deterding,» February 18, 1930, SC7/G32, Shell archives; Multinational Hearings, part 8, pp. 39–51 («local arrangements» and «local cartels»). Sadler to Harden et al., March 2, 1931, 6-9-18 file, case 1 («abrogated»); Sadler memo to Teagle, June 15, 1931, «misc.» file, case 9 («great sacrifice» and «price war»). Oil Companies papers. Weill to the Baron, March 14, 1930, 132 AQ 1052; March 23, 1932, 132A АО 1052, p. 572 («bad everywhere»), Rothschild papers. Larson, Standard Oil vol. 3, p. 311; John Cadman, «Petroleum and Policy,» in American Petroleum Institute, 13th Annual Meeting: Proceedings, 1932; FTC, International Petroleum Cartel, pp. 235–50.

7. Shuckburgh minute, January 15, 1934, F.W.S., December 12, 1933, Petroleum Dept. Memorandum, January 12, 1934, p. 4, W 488, FO 371/18488, PRO; Multinational Hearings, part 8, pp. 51–70 (on economies); FTC, International Petroleum Cartel, pp. 255, 264 («standardized»), 266. Teagle to Kessler, August 14, 1931, «various nos.» file, case 2; Harden memo, January 19, 1935, 12-1-3 file, case 6; Sadler memo, June 15, 1931, case 9 («ambition»); Riedemann to Teagle, June 26, 1935, and extract from June 6, 1935, Executive Committee meeting, 4-2-9 file, case 4; to Harper, September 29, 1933, Brown Envelope, case 9; «Gulf, SONJ, others» file, case 1, Oil Companies papers. Deterding to Riedemann, November 4, 1936, SC7/A14/1 («much needed munitions»); Emmert to Parker, December 21, 1934, SC7/A12 («unanimously opposed» and «private walls»); Godber to Agnew, December 31, 1934, SC7/A12, Shell archives. Peter F. Cowhey, The Problems of Plenty: Energy Policy and International Politics (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985), pp. 90–93.

8. Wilkins, Multinational Enterprise, pp. 234–38 («defensive manner,» «failure to cooperate» and «90 percent political»); Shuckburgh minute, January 15, 1934, F.W.S., December 12, 1933, Petroleum Dept. Memorandum, January 12, 1934, p. 4 («general tendency»), W 488, FO 371/18488 PRO; Harden memo, January 19, 1935, file 12-1-3, case 6 («nationalistic policies»), Oil Companies papers.

9. Peter J. Beck, «The Anglo-Persian Oil Dispute of 1932–33,» Journal of Contemporary History 9 (October 1974), pp. 127–43; Rowland, Cadman, pp. 123–33; Ferrier, British Petroleum, p. 610 («suspicion»); Stephen H. Longrigg, Oil in the Middle East: Its Discovery and Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968), 3d. ed., pp. 59–60 («Persianization»).

10. Jonathan С. Brown, «Why Foreign Oil Companies Shifted Their Production from Mexico to Venezuela During the 1920s,» American Historical Review 90 (April 1985), pp. 362–85; Roosevelt to Daniels, February 15, 1939, Official File 146, Roosevelt papers; Meyer, Oil Controversy, pp. 102, 127–54; Philip, Oil and Politics, p. 211.