Attempts to justify recommendations: Select Committee 1977b (“some witnesses…,” “After further review…,” xxxiii; “important questions…,” and “Does lowering…,” xxxvii).
“strong, forceful, competent”: Burros 1977. “people were getting…” and “Tell us…”: Interview, Carol Foreman.
NAS/USDA contract and Leveille’s speech: Broad 1979a. Handler and Fredrickson responses: Interview, Carol Foreman.
Forman hired Hegsted: Interviews, Mark Hegsted and Carol Foreman.
Report by a committee: Task Force Sponsored by the American Society for Clinical Nutrition 1979. “
“Avoid Too Much…”: USDA and USDHEW 1980.
House subcommittee hearings: Wade 1980.
Handler testified: Handler 1980.
Nutritionists in academia: Levenstein 1993 (work closely, 134–35; “unholy alliance,” 188).
Olson explained: Anon. 1980.
“To be a dissenter…”: Mann 1977. “…as big a pusher…”: Interview, David Kritchevsky.
Jacobson’s exposé: Rosenthal et al. 1976. “The important question…”: Stare 1987. Stamler’s funding from manufacturers: Blakeslee and Stamler 1966:x.
Funded by Frito-Lay: Interview, Mark Hegsted.
Honolulu study: Yano et al. 1978. In Framingham and Puerto Rico: Gordon et al. 1981.
“reconciling [their] study findings…”: Gordon et al. 1981.
Stamler’s Chicago studies: Dyer et al. 1981. Dayton and others: Pearce and Dayton 1971. Swiss Red Cross: Nydegger and Butler 1970. Six ongoing studies: Rose et al. 1974. British, Hungarian, and Czech: Anon. 1978. Study after study: Beaglehole et al. 1980; Kark et al. 1980; Garcia-Palmieri et al. 1981; Miller et al. 1981; Stemmermann et al. 1981; Kozarevic et al. 1981. Framingham Study: Williams et al. 1981. “surprise and chagrin”: Kolata 1981.
Norwegian study: Westlund and Nicolayson 1972. First NHLBI workshop: Feinleib 1981. Second workshop: Feinleib 1982. Levy’s comments: Kolata 1981.
Third workshop: Feinleib 1983. “the perplexing inconsistencies” and “not preclude…”: Feinleib 1983.
“throw the kitchen sink”: Interview, Stephen Hully. Details of MRFIT: MRFIT Research Group 1982.
$115 million: Kolata 1982.
“…Test Collapses”: Bishop 1982. Slightly more deaths: MRFIT Research Group 1982.
Details of LRC Trial: LRC Program 1979.
Results of the LRC trial: LRC Program 1984a; LRC Program 1984b. “conclusive…”: Quoted in Moore 1989:68 (see endnote 278).
“could and should…”: Consensus Conference 1985. “It is now indisputable…”: Anon. 1984a.
“unwarranted, unscientific…”: Quoted in Wallis 1984. “unconscionable…”: Quoted in Kolata 1985.
Rifkind later explained: Interview, Basil Rifkind.
“a massive health campaign”: Levy’s testimony in Select Committee 1977d:19. “Sorry, It’s True…”: Anon 1984a.
December consensus conference: Anon. 1984b; Ahrens 1985; Oliver 1985; interviews, Pete Ahrens, David Kritchevsky, Robert Olson, Basil Rifkind, and Daniel Steinberg. “Many people…”: Quoted in Kolata 1985.
“were selected to include…”: Oliver 1985. “no doubt…”: Consensus Conference 1985. “you wouldn’t have…”: Interview, Daniel Steinberg.
CHAPTER FOUR:
THE GREATER GOOD
NCEP 1987 guidelines: Anon. 1988. “The edict…”: Thompson and Squires 1987.
Writers of the surgeon general’s report: Interviews, Marion Nestle, managing editor of the report, and Nancy Ernst of NHLBI. Writers of the
Jacobson scolding the authors: Sugarman 1989 (includes Motulsky quote); Burros 1989.
Hungarian study: Korányi 1963. British study: Research Committee 1965.
“…some indication…”: Ernst and Levy 1984. A new generation: See, for instance, Rovner 1988.
Cholesterol and sudden cardiac death: Kannel and Thomas 1982; Dawber 1980 (“The lack of association…,” 131). 63 Stamler’s MRFIT reanalysis: Stamler et al. 1986.
Whether we would live longer: Ibid.