Страх. История политической идеи

(3) Robert Schackleton, Montesquieu: A Critical Biography (London: Oxford University Press, 1961), pp. 3–5, 13–18, 85–89, 202, 226-28; Judith N. Shklar, Montesquieu (New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 1–5, 18–19, 69, 74–75, 79–81; Nannerl Keohane, Philosophy and the State in France: The Renaissance to the Enlightenment (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980), pp. 403-7; Franz Neumann. Montesquieu, в изд.: The Democratic and Authoritarian State: Essays in Political and Legal Theory / ed. Herbert’ Marcuse (New York: Free Press, 1957), pp. 111-12; Melvin Richter, The Political Theory of Montesquieu (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977). pp. 31–32, 45–46; Melvin Richter, Despotism, в изд: Dictionary of the History of Ideas. vol. 2 / ed. Philip P. Wiener (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1973), pp. 7–9; Raymond Aron, Main Currents in Sociological Thought I: Montesquieu, Comte, Marx. Tocqueville, the Sociologists of the Revolution of 1848 / trans. Richard Howard and Helen Weaver (Garden City, ny.: Doubleday, 1968), p. 26; R. Koebner, Despot and Despotism: Vicissitudes of a Political Term // Journal of the Warburg and Courtland Institutes 14 (1951): 293–302; Orest Ranum, Personality and Politics in the Persian letters // Political Science Quarterly 84 (December 1969): 609-12, 617-22; Franco Venturi, Oriental Despotism // Journal of the History of Ideas 24 (January-March 1963): 134-36; David Young, Montesquieu’s View of Despotism and His Use of Travel Literature // Review of Politics 40 (July 1978): 404-5.

(4) Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws / ed. Anne M. Cohler et al. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989), 1.2, pp. 6–7.

(5) Voltaire, LA, B, C, in Philosophical Dictionary, vol. 2 / trans. Peter Gay (New York Basic, 1962), p. 508.

(6) Исследователи, обращавшиеся к «Персидским письмам», ошибочно считали, что содержащийся в этой книге анализ деспотического террора идентичен анализу «Духа законов» либо что это было раннее следствие его более позднего труда. См.: Roger Boesche, Fearing Monarchs and Merchants: Montesquieu’s Two Theories of Despotism, Western Political Quarterly 43 (December 1990): 742; Mark Hulliung, Montesquieu and the Old Regime (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976), p. 138; Pauline Kra, The Invisible Chain of the Lettres Persanes, Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century (1963): 11; Tzvetan Todorov, On Human Diversity: Nationalism, Racism, and Exoticism in French Thought / trans. Catherine Porter (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1993), p. 353; Neumann, p. 102; Richter, Despotism, p. 9; Richter, The Political Theory of Montesquieu, p. 45; Shackleton, Montesquieu, p. 45; Shklar, Montesquieu, p. 67. О критике данных анализов и более полный анализ того, как «Персидские письма» противоречат «Духу законов» cм: Corey Robin, Reflections on Fear: Montesquieu in Retrieval // American Political Science Review 94 (June 2000): 347-60.

(7) Persian Letters, letters 1, 8, 17. 105-6, 115, pp. 47, 54. 68–69, 195–99, 210–12; Shklar, Montesquieu, pp. 26–27, 30

(8) Hulliung. p. 123; Shklar, Montesquieu, pp. 31, 34; Todorov, pp. 355-56.

(9) Isaiah Berlin, Montesquieu, в изд.: Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas / ed Henry Hardy (London: Hogarth Press, 1990), pp. 130-61; Sheldon Wolin, Montesquieu and Publius: The Crisis of Reason and The Federalist Papers, в изд.: The Presence of the Past: Essays on the State and the Constitution (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1989), pp. 100-19; Shklar, Montesquieu, pp. 107, 124.

(10) Persian Letters, letters 2, 20, pp. 47–48, 73–74.