Читаем The Rebel Angels полностью

No, I don't think so. Granting freely that I am not Sophia, which no living woman could be except in tiny measure, what am I in the world of Simon Darcourt? I am a woman from far away, because of my Gypsy heritage; a woman, I suppose, of the Middle Ages. A woman who can in some measure talk Simon's language of learning and the kind of speculation learning begets. A woman not afraid of the possibilities that lurk in the background of modern life, but which so much of modern life denies utterly – a woman whom one can call Sophia with the certainty that she will know what is being said. A woman, in fact, whom a beglamoured man might think of as Sophia without being a fool.

Ah, but there is the word that pulls me up sharp – beglamoured. The word glamour has been so battered and smeared that almost everybody has forgotten that it means magic and enchantment. Could it really be that poor Simon was a victim of my Gypsy mother's cup of hocussed coffee, and saw wonders in me because he had been given a love philtre, a sexy Mickey Finn? I hate the idea, but I cannot say with absolute certainty that there is no truth in it. And if I cannot say that, what sort of Divine Wisdom am I, what possible embodiment of Sophia? Or is it not Sophia's part to split hairs in such matters?

Whatever the answers to these hard questions, I had the gumption to tell Simon that I did indeed love him, which was true, and that I could not possibly think of marrying him, which was also true. And as he could not consider doing anything about a physical love without marriage (for reasons that I understood and thought greatly to his credit, though I did not share his reluctance) that was that. The love was a reality, but it was a reality within limits.

What astonished me was his relief when the limits had been defined. I knew, as I don't suppose he did for a long time afterwards, that he had never in the truest sense wanted to marry me – didn't even want unbearably to make sexual love to me. He wanted a love that excluded those things, and he knew that such a love was possible, and he had achieved it. And so had I. When we parted each was richer by a loving and enduring and delightful friend, and I was perhaps the happier of the two because in the hour I had wholly changed my feeling about Hollier.

The knowledge of Simon's love made it easier for me to endure the painful tensions in Hollier's rooms from this time until Easter, and to respond whole-heartedly when Simon telephoned me shortly after seven o'clock on the morning of Easter Sunday.

"Maria, I thought you should know as soon as possible that Parlabane is dead. Very sudden, and the doctor says it was heart – no, no suspicion of anything else, though I feared that, too. I'll attend to everything, and there seems to be no reason to wait, so I'm arranging the funeral for tomorrow morning. Will you bring Clem? We're his only friends, it appears. Poor devil? Yes, that's what I said: poor devil."

4

Hollier, Darcourt, and I drove back from the funeral happy because we seemed to have regained something that Parlabane had taken from us. We were refreshed and drawn together by this shared feeling, and did not want to part. That was why Hollier asked Darcourt if he would come up to his rooms for a cup of tea. We had just finished a long, vinous lunch but it was a day for hospitality.

I stopped in the porter's lodge to see if there was any mail for Hollier; there is no postal delivery on Easter Monday, but the inter-college service in the university might have something from the weekend that had begun the previous Thursday.

"Package for the Professor, Miss," said Fred the porter, and handed me an untidy bundle done up in brown paper, to which a letter was fastened with sticky tape. I recognized Parlabane's ill-formed writing and saw that there was a scrawl of direction: Confidential: Letter before Package, Please.

"More of the dreadful novel," said Hollier when I showed it to him. He threw it down on the table, I made tea, and we went on with our chat, which was all of Parlabane. At last Hollier said, "Better see what that is, Maria. I suppose it's an epilogue, or something of the kind. Poor man, he died full of hope about his book. We'll have to decide what to do about it."

"We've all done what we could," said Darcourt. "The only thing we can do now is recover the typescript and get rid of it."

I had opened the letter. "It seems awfully long, and it's to both of us," I said to Hollier; "do you want me to read it?"

He nodded, and I began.


"Dear Friends and Colleagues, Clem and Molly:

– As you will have guessed, it was I who gave his quietus to Urky McVarish."

"Christ!" said Hollier.

"So that's who the flag was at half-staff for," said Darcourt.

"Does he mean it? He can't mean murder?"

"Get on, Maria, get on!"

Перейти на страницу:

Похожие книги

Ад
Ад

Анри Барбюс (1873–1935) — известный французский писатель, лауреат престижной французской литературной Гонкуровской премии.Роман «Ад», опубликованный в 1908 году, является его первым романом. Он до сих пор не был переведён на русский язык, хотя его перевели на многие языки.Выйдя в свет этот роман имел большой успех у читателей Франции, и до настоящего времени продолжает там регулярно переиздаваться.Роману более, чем сто лет, однако он включает в себя многие самые животрепещущие и злободневные человеческие проблемы, существующие и сейчас.В романе представлены все главные события и стороны человеческой жизни: рождение, смерть, любовь в её различных проявлениях, творчество, размышления научные и философские о сути жизни и мироздания, благородство и низость, слабости человеческие.Роман отличает предельный натурализм в описании многих эпизодов, прежде всего любовных.Главный герой считает, что вокруг человека — непостижимый безумный мир, полный противоречий на всех его уровнях: от самого простого житейского до возвышенного интеллектуального с размышлениями о вопросах мироздания.По его мнению, окружающий нас реальный мир есть мираж, галлюцинация. Человек в этом мире — Ничто. Это означает, что он должен быть сосредоточен только на самом себе, ибо всё существует только в нём самом.

Анри Барбюс

Классическая проза
Радуга в небе
Радуга в небе

Произведения выдающегося английского писателя Дэвида Герберта Лоуренса — романы, повести, путевые очерки и эссе — составляют неотъемлемую часть литературы XX века. В настоящее собрание сочинений включены как всемирно известные романы, так и издающиеся впервые на русском языке. В четвертый том вошел роман «Радуга в небе», который публикуется в новом переводе. Осознать степень подлинного новаторства «Радуги» соотечественникам Д. Г. Лоуренса довелось лишь спустя десятилетия. Упорное неприятие романа британской критикой смог поколебать лишь Фрэнк Реймонд Ливис, напечатавший в середине века ряд содержательных статей о «Радуге» на страницах литературного журнала «Скрутини»; позднее это произведение заняло видное место в его монографии «Д. Г. Лоуренс-романист». На рубеже 1900-х по обе стороны Атлантики происходит знаменательная переоценка романа; в 1970−1980-е годы «Радугу», наряду с ее тематическим продолжением — романом «Влюбленные женщины», единодушно признают шедевром лоуренсовской прозы.

Дэвид Герберт Лоуренс

Проза / Классическая проза
Вор
Вор

Леонид Леонов — один из выдающихся русских писателей, действительный член Академии паук СССР, Герой Социалистического Труда, лауреат Ленинской премии. Романы «Соть», «Скутаревский», «Русский лес», «Дорога на океан» вошли в золотой фонд русской литературы. Роман «Вор» написан в 1927 году, в новой редакции Л. Леонона роман появился в 1959 году. В психологическом романе «Вор», воссоздана атмосфера нэпа, облик московской окраины 20-х годов, показан быт мещанства, уголовников, циркачей. Повествуя о судьбе бывшего красного командира Дмитрия Векшина, писатель ставит многие важные проблемы пореволюционной русской жизни.

Виктор Александрович Потиевский , Леонид Максимович Леонов , Меган Уэйлин Тернер , Михаил Васильев , Роннат , Яна Егорова

Фантастика / Проза / Классическая проза / Малые литературные формы прозы: рассказы, эссе, новеллы, феерия / Романы