"He was a Swiss, actually; not a German. An immensely learned man, but greatest as a botanist, I suppose. In these four volumes he brought together everything that was known about every animal that had been identified by scholars up to 1550. It is a treasure-house of fact and supposition, but it aims at being scientific. It's not like those medieval bestiaries that deal simply in legend and old wives' tales."
"I thought old wives' tales were your stock in trade, Hollier," said Urky.
"The growth of scientific knowledge is my stock in trade, if that's what you want to call it," said Hollier, without geniality.
"Let's see the Beerbohms," said Urky. "Oh, marvellous!
Of course it was valuable, but that wasn't the point; it was authentic Max. How Ellerman would have loved it!
"It won't be sold," I said, perhaps more sharply than was wise. "I'll leave it as a treasure in my will."
"Not to Spook, I hope," said Urky.
What a busybody the man was!
Arthur saw that I was being harried. He ran his hand appreciatively over the splendid back of the nude bronze. "Very fine," he said.
"Ah, but do you see what finally decided me?" said Urky. "Look at her. Doesn't she remind you of anyone? Somebody we all four know?… Look closely. It's Maria Magdalena Theotoky to the life."
"There's a resemblance, certainly," said Arthur.
"Though we can't – or I'd better say I can't – answer for the whole figure," said Urky. "Still, one can guess at what lies under modern clothes. Who was the model? Being Canova, it was probably a lady from Napoleon's court. He must have known her intimately. Observe the detail of the modelling."
The bronze Venus was about twenty-five inches tall; the figure was seated, one foot resting on the other knee, lovingly tying the laces of a sandal. What was unusual about it was that the vulva, which sculptors usually represent as an imperforate lump of flesh, was here realistically defined. It was not pornographic; it had the grace and the love of the female figure Canova knew so well how to impart to his statuary.
It is hard for me to be just to Urky. Certainly he appreciated the beauty of the figure, but there was a moist gleam in his eye that hinted at an erotic appreciation, as well… And why not, Darcourt, you miserable puritan? Is this some nineteenth-century nonsense about art banishing sensuality, or some twentieth-century nonsense about a human figure being no more than an arrangement of masses and planes? No, I didn't like Urky's attitude towards the Venus because he had linked it with a girl we knew, and whom Hollier knew especially well, and Urky was seeking to embarrass us. What I would have accepted without qualm from another man, I didn't like at all when it came from Urky.
"You agree that it looks like Maria, don't you Hollier?" he said.
"I certainly agree that it looks like Maria," said Arthur, unexpectedly.
"A stunner, isn't she?" said Urky to Arthur, but with his eye on Hollier. "Tell me, just as a matter of interest, where would you place her in the Rushton Scale?"
We all looked blank at this.
"Surely you know it? Devised by W. A. H. Rushton, the great Cambridge mathematician? Well, it's this way: Helen of Troy is accepted as the absolute in female beauty, and we have it on a poet's authority that her face launched a thousand ships. But clearly "face" implies the whole woman. Therefore let us call a face that launches a thousand ships a
"I'd say she's a friend of mine, and I don't rate friends by mathematical computation," said Arthur.
"Oh, Arthur, that's very square! Never mention a lady's name in the mess, eh?"