Коммуникационный менеджмент власти

11. Ноэль-Нойман Э. Общественное мнение. Открытие спирали молчания. М., 1996.

12. Ортега-и-Гассет Х. Восстание масс. М., 2003.

13. Русакова О.Ф., Русаков В.М. PR-дискурс: теоретико-методологический анализ. Екатеринбург, 2008.

14. Улановский А.М. Теория речевых актов и социальный конструкционизм // Постнеклассическая психология. Социальный конструкционизм и нарративный подход. 2004. № 1.

15. Хабермас Ю. Теория коммуникативного действия // Вестник Московского университета. Философия. 1993. № 4. C. 43–63.

16. Шумпетер Й.А. Капитализм, социализм и демократия. М., 1995.

17. Яноу Д., ван Хульст М. Фреймы политического: от фрейм-анализа к анализу фреймирования // Социологическое обозрение. 2011. Т 10. № 1–2. С. 87—113.

18. Altheide D.L. Media logic and political communication // Political Communication. 2004. Vol. 21 (3). P. 293–296.

19. Altheide D.L., Snow R.P. Media logic. London: Sage Publications, 1979.

20. Amsterdam A.G., Bruner J.S. Minding the law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000.

21. Appel M., Richter T. Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion. A mediated moderation model // Media Psychology. 2010. Vol. 13. P. 101–135.

22. Arnold W.E., McCroskey J.C. The credibility of reluctant testimony // The Central States Speech Journal. 1967. Vol. 18. P. 97—103.

23. Arrow K. Social choice and individual values. N.Y.: John Wiley and Sons, 1951.

24. Baker S., Martinson D.L. The TARES test: Five principles for ethical persuasion // Journal of Mass Media Ethics. 2001. Vol. 16 (2–3). P. 148–175.

25. Baum M.A. Circling the wagons: Soft news and isolationism in American public opinion // International Studies Quarterly. 2004. Vol. 48 (2). P. 313–338.

26. Baum M.A. Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public // American Journal of Political Science. 2002. № 96. P. 91—109.

27. Baum M.A., Jamison A.S. The Oprah effect: How soft news helps inattentive citizens vote consistently // The Journal of Politics. 2006. Vol. 68 (4). P. 946–959.

28. Benford R.D., Snow D.A. Framing processes and social movements: An Overview and assessment // Annual Review of Sociology. 2000. № 26. P. 611–639.

29. Bennett W.L. Beyond pseudoevents: Election news as reality TV // American Behavioral Scientist. 2005. Vol. 49 (3). P. 364–378.

30. Bennett W.L. News: The Politics of illusion. N.Y.: Longman, 1984.

31. Bennett W.L. Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States // Journal of Communication. 1990. Vol. 40 (2). Р. 103–125.

32. Bennett W.L., Lawrence R., Livingston S. When the press fails: Political power and the news media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2007.

33. Bentele G., Liebert T., Seeling S. Von der Determination zur Intereffikation: Ein integriertes Modell zum Verhaltnis von Public Relations und Journalimus // Aktuelle Entstehung von Offentlichkeit. Akteure, Strukturen, Veranderungen / eds. G. Bentele, M. Haller. Konstanz: UVK, 1997. S. 225–250.

34. Bessette J.M. Deliberative democracy: The Majority principle in republican government // How democratic is the constitution? // eds. R.A. Goldwin, W.A. Schambra. Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, 1980. P. 102–116.

35. Bird S.E. The audience in everyday life: Living in a media world. N.Y.: Routledge, 2003.

36. Birkland T. A. Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting // Journal of Public Policy. 1998. Vol. 18 (1). P. 53–74.

37. Bitzer L.F. The rhetorical situation // Philosophy and Rhetoric. 1968. № 1. P. 1—14.

38. Black М. Metaphor // Black M. Models and metaphor. Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1962. P. 25–47.

39. Blader S.L., Tyler T.R. A Four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a «fair» process // personality and social psychology bulletin. 2003. Vol. 29 (6). P.747–758.

40. Blumer H. Social problems as collective behavior // Social Problems. 1971. № 18. P. 298–306.

41. Blumler J.G., Kavanagh D. The Third Age of political communication: Influences and features // Political Communication. 1999. № 16. P. 209–230.

42. Boorstin D.J. The image: Or what happened to the American dream. N.Y.: Atheneum, 1962/1977.

43. Boswell J. Policy narratives in a deliberative system // Australian Political Science Association Conference, September 26–28, 2010, University of Melbourne.

44. Bovens M. Public accountability // The Oxford Handbook of Public Management / eds. E. Ferlie, L. Lynne, C. Pollitt. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004. P. 182–208.

45. Bülow-Møller A.V Corporate apologia and the attribution of guilt // Rhetorical Aspects of Discourses in present-day society / eds. L. Dam, L.-L. Holmgreen, J. Strunck. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press, 2009. P. 340–358.

46. Calhoun C. Introduction: Habermas and the public sphere // Habermas and the public sphere / ed. C. Calhoun. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992. P. 1—50.